If I've been stung by a company, either by having purchased a disappointing product from it, or having been disappointed at new offerings giving me little improvement at price point for a good upgrade, I would choose to vent my frustrations on a website devoted primarily to that company and its products. Is that not rational? The issue, in many cases, is that some folks take criticism of a company as being a personal insult. I've posted over the last year or so my frustrations with the new MBP offerings as well as iPhone offerings in particular, on both this website and others of similar bent. This isn't because I hate Apple or feel derisive toward people who are pleased with Apple. It is because I'm disappointed that Apple has, at least for me, failed to create a product at sufficient price point/technical improvement to justify replacing my current Apple products - in my case, iPhone, MBP, iMac, and iPad - with respectively new versions of those products. I hope that the new iMacs will offer sufficient innovation and improvement along with affordable pricing to justify my replacing my old one with a new one this year. We'll see. I'm sorry you feel this to be insulting to you somehow - that isn't my intention. My intention is to put something out there in the ether which might somehow contribute to Apple's hearing my and others' current frustrations with their product directions. My criticism, or perceived criticism of "people who like current Apple products and directions", is only directed at those who interpret my dislikes to be somehow insulting to those who are satisfied or pleased. I'm simply expressing my views on the company and its product line in hopes that they will somehow listen. That you or anyone else happen not to agree does not, at least for me, mean that I have personal issues with you. Perhaps my dichotomy should have been better described. Onward ...