Well done. Do you not think I *KNOW* what I've said? Well done again.
"and people pointed out how you were wrong on the last 2"
I'm okay being wrong, I ain't prideful.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Tim Cook Shares First Photos Taken With iPhone 7 Plus
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well done. Do you not think I *KNOW* what I've said? Well done again.
"and people pointed out how you were wrong on the last 2"
I'm okay being wrong, I ain't prideful.
...says the guy who countered someone with the argument that he couldn't know about bokeh without actually having an iPhone 7 in his hand (turns out it's just math and the other guy was right because he actually understood photography).
Was hoping to see in door shots. Always want to see the quality of cameras without lots of natural lighting
That's because you're not looking at the originals on the Sports Illustrated site:
http://www.si.com/nfl/photo/2016/09/11/iphone-7-plus-sneak-preview-photos
That's nice. Good spot. I was "wrong" -_-
Anything else, or is our therapy done, oh moral judge and fault-finding overseer?
he's waiting for you to insult everyone again so he can put you back in your place.....just give up man....if your gonna insult everyone at least pick out some bad behavior that you didn't just do haha
4:3 uses the full sensor (which is also 4:3), and photos are printed and scrutinised and looked at FAR closer than video, and 16:9 takes a slice of the sensor, as it's not the same shape.
[doublepost=1473651273][/doublepost]
You mean... UNclearly, surely?
Note: I wasn't claiming these rival professional gear. They are no where close to even my rig (which currently comes in around $10k for body and lenses). That's not the point.
I was just trying to say that even someone like me that is fairly critical of photo quality (and it sounds like you are too) can say: "Hey, that's not bad!".
It's hard to judge anything about sharpness from these because they have been so heavily downsized and compressed.
I think the colors look great. It's obvious that all of those extra elements they've added have done a great job at delivering a uniform image edge to edge. Also, the transition areas and grading into the shadows looks smooth (a bit hard to tell with all of the compression and lack of resolution... but I'm trying to see through that).
This is only the beginning... we really need to inspect full res, uncompressed images before making any sort of a verdict... but I think this is a positive start.
Edit:
Since we're critiquing other's work... we might as well put out our own. Here are some of mine: https://500px.com/friedmud
Note: I'm not, at all, a professional... just someone that loves taking photos and works hard at it in his free time
Getting these shots is easy. You just need to become a permitted official photographer so you can stand in front of anything. Imagine all the other photographers behind: Step aside you ****! You are blocking everyone.
Since we're critiquing other's work... we might as well put out our own. Here are some of mine: https://500px.com/friedmud
Note: I'm not, at all, a professional... just someone that loves taking photos and works hard at it in his free time
Note: I'm not, at all, a professional... just someone that loves taking photos and works hard at it in his free time
Dear trolls, general pedantics, fault-finders and general right-all-the-time folk:
Had you actually WATCHED the keynote and HEARD what they said, you'll remember Schiller saying "We are not saying you should throw out your dSLR".
It's a PHONE CAMERA - they have admitted that and by implication, you are an idiot if you expect it to rival or better a PROFESSIONAL camera. You are a fool if you think otherwise, this is implied by them, because they KNOW and admit that limitation.
Had you actually WATCHED the keynote and HEARD what they said, you'll remember Schiller saying "We are not saying you should throw out your dSLR".
It's a PHONE CAMERA - they have admitted that and by implication, you are an idiot if you expect it to rival or better a PROFESSIONAL camera. You are a fool if you think otherwise, this is implied by them, because they KNOW and admit that limitation.
You're right, and I am pretty certain that the majority of these people were dragged up with no sense of moral framework or boundaries (they're gonna deny that, clearly!)
Civil, yes, but a random spattering of strangers that just so happen to have the same curiosities as me ARE NOT going to become "my friends" any more than I'd expect all the people in the supermarket to be "my friends", just because they also happen to be in the same place.
Can you spell delusion? The internet can, and lives it to the fullest extent!
[doublepost=1473649751][/doublepost]
Pity forums can't allow people to boot one another off a thread for a week - that would be SO much fun.
This forum as well as pretty much all others on the internet suffer the same problem. People posting anonymously and safely from a keyboard. If you inquire about them, it's always the same story... they're 6'4", 240lbs of raw muscle. They've completed 5 degrees (two of which are PhD's). They work as models and freelance as bodyguards in their off time. They're experts in everything and they believe that only THEIR opinion matters and anyone with a different view is an underling who doesn't deserve to breathe the same air as they do.
Oh and I forgot to mention, these same folks make well into six figures each month playing the markets.
Those still look oversaturated and artificial to me. I'll wait for a proper hands-on review of the camera but at best it looks like it may pull even with Samsung's best. Meh.
This forum as well as pretty much all others on the internet suffer the same problem. People posting anonymously and safely from a keyboard. If you inquire about them, it's always the same story... they're 6'4", 240lbs of raw muscle. They've completed 5 degrees (two of which are PhD's). They work as models and freelance as bodyguards in their off time. They're experts in everything and they believe that only THEIR opinion matters and anyone with a different view is an underling who doesn't deserve to breathe the same air as they do.
Oh and I forgot to mention, these same folks make well into six figures each month playing the markets.
Nah, they're just average nice enough folks with too much time on their hands and a humility deficit.
No way iPhone 4 would take these kind of pics. I guess your 3GS would take better pics.
[doublepost=1473651803][/doublepost]
As long as it doesn't explode.
Well, i can't say i don't want one, because i do!! But i am going to have to choose to either upgrade the MBP or the iphone. I think i will wait for the new MBP and hold out for the 2017 iPhone model!
Since we're critiquing other's work... we might as well put out our own. Here are some of mine: https://500px.com/friedmud
Note: I'm not, at all, a professional... just someone that loves taking photos and works hard at it in his free time
Excellent body of work! Great eye...
