Shareholders and you agree…The shareholders raking in cash and customers buying all the products agree
Shareholders and you agree…The shareholders raking in cash and customers buying all the products agree
Yes the last cool thing for me was FaceID. I think the Landscape FaceID is cooler than anything else lately.Innovation? Apple is having a LONG dry spell. OK, they added more megapixels to the cell phone camera and swapped out the CPU on the Mac. But I don't see anything that allows a person to do something new, not sense Steve Jobs was running Apple.
It would be a mistake Maestri is good at finance not technology.That's if he will ever walk away. I think It will be Luca Maestri. Yes, Craig is a great choice but I don't see it happening.
![]()
Apple Leadership - Luca Maestri
Luca Maestri is Apple’s senior vice president of Corporate Services and a member of Apple’s executive leadership team. Learn more about Luca.www.apple.com
Maybe he’s a share holder?Shareholders and you agree…
Said noone EVER.
And if the PS5 had Halo and all the other Xbox exclusives, then Sony would sell more PlayStations and Microsoft would lose their stranglehold over the West. Wouldn't it be swell if PS5 owners could play Halo Infinite against Xbox owners? Or if Xbox owners could play Last of Us against Playstation owners, then Microsoft would sell a lot more Xboxes and Sony would sell less PlayStation's.Do you understand that that proves just how terrible the iPhone actually is?! People claim the iphone is the greatest thing since sliced bread, but all it takes is an app on another platform and people would willingly jump to Android in a heartbeat despite the millions of comments on this forum saying Android is so terrible. So what is Apple really selling? A really great app with a crap phone/OS?
I honestly don't even know why he does them they are so monotonous and uninteresting. It's the same droning on and on. Its because he runs a technology company, but isn't a technology buff himself, he has people for that. It's not really his fault, he's an operations guy at heart. But you'll never see him write an open letter along the lines of why Adobe Flash is dead etc because he's in touch with the current state of tech and where it needs to go etc.Another PR interview with the scripted questions and talking points. Apple executives are never grilled by journalists these days. Sad
So the best response you can do is a deflection? Thank you for proving my point.And if the PS5 had Halo and all the other Xbox exclusives, then Sony would sell more PlayStations and Microsoft would lose their stranglehold over the West. Wouldn't it be swell if PS5 owners could play Halo Infinite against Xbox owners? Or if Xbox owners could play Last of Us against Playstation owners, then Microsoft would sell a lot more Xboxes and Sony would sell less PlayStation's.
And the customers.Shareholders and you agree…
I don't know what else to say. It's a feature Apple has spent a fortune developing and that people love, it makes people want to stick with iPhone. Google should be paying Apple billions a year to make their phones compatible.So the best response you can do is a deflection? Thank you for proving my point.
Yeah, like all the other computer manufacturers making market busting new products...like, um, well there's, no not them, maybe. In case you haven't noticed, computers and phones are a pretty mature market at this point. The others are apparently waiting for Apple's AR-VR entry (solution in search of a problem IMO).I would like to see the entire upper management replaced with TRUE innovators.
I am surprised you said this about CookAnother race to the bottom with inane comments.
So much negativity. Apple continues to make great products which elicit passion, otherwise this message board would not exist to the extent it does. Few in any people in this forum have any clue of what it takes to successfully run a multi-trillion dollar company, the largest company in the world. It's a publicly traded company and they do bear responsibility to shareholders. I think they do try to follow their mission statement to some degree at the same time. This doesn't seem to stop all the small-minded armchair quarterbacking though.I would like to see the entire upper management replaced with TRUE innovators.
Someone with an engineering background* couldn't possibly be interested in Popular Mechanics. Makes sense.Popular Mechanics??!! Cook is so far removed from the ethos of Popular Mechanics it is not even funny.
That’s because he’s just regurgitating what someone else (ahem, Steve) said, except Steve backed his words with actions. And for crying out loud, if he’s going to repeat Steve’s mantra, like…Tim Cook says so much here without actually saying anything at all. Every response just turns into an opportunity to sell an Apple product. I don't feel like I'm reading a human being saying anything real. Should I expect to? Not through the lens of capitalism, no. But it sure would be nice to know there's a living person - and not just an uber-wealthy corporate entity - being interviewed here. This might as well be prefaced with "Sponsored" across the page.
Except for copy and paste maybe…under the jobs era.Innovation? Apple is having a LONG dry spell. OK, they added more megapixels to the cell phone camera and swapped out the CPU on the Mac. But I don't see anything that allows a person to do something new, not sense Steve Jobs was running Apple.
He is not even close to filling Steve's shoes. A beard.....ha ha....For some reason I was expecting Tim to have grown a beard as I scrolled down over this photo.
🤷♂️
There's not a required correlation between earning a degree 40 years ago and having an ethos that aligns with that field in the present day. I know plenty of people who got a degree and then never used their specific expertise in their career moving forward. It's not that Tim Cook "couldn't possibly be interested" in Popular Mechanics, of course that's possible. His interests, his personal ethos, and his public persona are all separate discussion points. The point is that this is a press release disguised as an interview. The publication lines up enough with Cook's (and Apple's) public persona and he would have never spoke to Popular Mechanics if this wasn't true (along with having control with what questions could be asked, what questions couldn't be asked, what the framing/expectation of the piece was, etc.). It should be read like an advertisement, nothing more, and I think it's fair for people to criticize it through this lens.Someone with an engineering background* couldn't possibly be interested in Popular Mechanics. Makes sense.
*Cook has a Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering from Auburn.
There are a few here whom are no doubt, shareholders.Maybe he’s a share holder?
Anyway, Tim Cook has obviously done a great job financially speaking, but it is also clear that Apple under his leadership is less focussed on the products. I’ve been using Apple products since the original Mac, and still do, but now they are designed to optimize profitability instead of user experience and satisfaction. Sometimes those go hand in hand! Sometimes they don’t, and then you know what todays Apple will prioritise.
Would love to see him in a beard. But I think he shaves every single day. Do we have any Apple exec's with a beard or a mustache? I can't seem to recall. Maybe it's not allowed?For some reason I was expecting Tim to have grown a beard as I scrolled down over this photo.
🤷♂️