Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
True...but for the amount of products Apple creates (3 laptops, 3 desktops, some accessories, and an iPad/iPhone/iPod line), I don't see his job being particularly difficult IN THAT he requires this amount of compensation. So, overall, Apple has a very small computer line, a very small accessories line, and a mishmosh phone/tablet/music player line.

Apple has been so uninspiring to me the past few years...it's just new iPhones and iPods every year with, yawn, new colors, 1/12th of an inch smaller, and a new iOS...yawn again. Apple has become a 1-trick pony (iOS). If Samsung's new phones hadn't exploded a few months ago, 2016 would have been a LOT worse for Apple.

2017 is going to be quite difficult for Apple...the latest Macs have nothing but lackluster reviews at best...no sign of Mac desktops...iPads seem to out of ideas...iPhones have been #2 since at least Q1 2016 to Samsung. My guess is that Tim's last year could be 2017.
Even with the minimal product line Apple has they aren't capable of keeping that minimal line up to date. Programmers are being pulled out of the OS X team to focus more on iOS. They are pulled from designing computers and focus more on iPhone and iPads. For what? iPhone and iPads haven't evolved much in years. Updates aren't even yearly (except iPhone if you'll call 6s to 7 an update).

Sometimes I beg to wonder if Apple has 99.996 people working in marketing/sales, 3 developers creating software and services and 1 hardware engineer.
 
A utterly disgusting portrayal of complete arrogant wealth! That means they must earn more then the average wages of their store staff for a year, every half a day if that!

I find it very unsettling the massive huge gap between the elitist super rich and the normal people in this capitalist world. Children literally dying in third world countries whilst corrupt governments and charities pocket all the money donated to them, and CEOs are paid millions every year.

Truly one f***** up world this can be.

Have you even heard of Fat Cat Wednesday? It was this Wednesday just gone. It's the day when the world's top paid have already earned more this calendar year than the average yearly wage of everyone else (£28,000 in the UK). 3 days into 2017 and they've already surpassed the majority.
 
I think the big problem with the 6(s) to 7 is that the new version is supposed to convince users to upgrade. there needs to be something tangible there that people go "hot damn, i NEED that new phone"

So regardless if the 6 was so well designed or not. The 7 was not a product that sold itself. If you're a 6s user, what compelling reason is there to upgrade to the 7? are 6 and 6s devices "slow"? no. They're not. they were already amazingly fast. the 6s arleady provided performance that saw most things load instantly or fast enough to not be noticable. the 7 might offer stupendous performance in comparison, but the point of diminishing returns makes it irrelevant. An App loading in 1 second versus the 1.01 second is not a real selling point.

the Camera could have been, but the dual camera setup was only given to the "plus" size, which, not everybody wants. there's a reason why 5" area is the best selling sizes in smartphones. Not Phablet (though they do well). Limiting the 7's functionality doesn't really change it over the 6s again (though OIS is a nice addition)

Other than that, the big "feature" of the 7 is no headphone port. And you'll be hard pressed to convince buyers that spending more, to get less, is not really an ideal sales tactic.

One of the big things That I think is impacting the 7 sales is that unlike previous number generations, this is the first time that there was not a redesign as part of the update. Going from the iphone 3-4(s) was a huge redesign. Going from the 4(s) to the 5(s) saw a new design and move to 16:9. 5 to 6(s) saw moving towards larger devices and another new design. But going from the 6(s) to the 7 is fundamentally the exact same design (Moving anntena bands and changing the home button to a touch sensor isn't a redesign)

is the iPhone 7 the best iphone? Yes. It is. Is there some giant compelling reason to upgrade from 6 to 7? no, there really isn't.
we don't know how well the 7 sold yet - this pay cut is related to 6s sales.
 
I greatly appreciate his stance on our privacy. However, the lack of what I think is "innovation" coming out of Cupertino is appalling. I think he is a great CEO for brining in money due to an existing customer base and delivering mediocre product updates with high profit margins. Things seemed to be rushed now and there appears to be a lack of focus with his company. He seems to be allowing them to be falling behind their competitors. I don't know how much longer he can ride on Steve's coattails...
 
Apple isn't the same Apple, but still not sure if that is a bad thing or not. When you become the biggest player, you have more problems trying to please everyone. Not sure how Steve would've made things different.

You're right about one thing. Gone are the days Apple was ahead of the pack by producing the best experience a customer could have. The best desktops, laptops, iPods, iPads, phones. Far ahead in OS, hardware and services. It has always been premium priced but the above arguments made it justified. That was the Apple that made me proud.

Fast forward 4 years later (today). Mediocre ancient hardware sold as new. Buggy software and crippled services. No focus and minimizing the volatile Apple ecosystem by discontinuing monitors, routers?, Mac Pro?.

My wish for 2017 is that Apple's income will nosedive so Cook & Co are forced to respond.

It's not about pleasing everyone... it's about pleasing your customers!
 
Craig Federighi is the only executive officer who has never had his salary and stock grants disclosed in an SEC filing. I wonder why? I'm not sure if who they choose to disclose is based on importance but I'd certainly rank him above Dan Riccio. What does Riccio actually do? Jeff Williams owns Apple Watch and Johny Srouji owns all of Apple's silicon. What is Riccio's responsibility besides not updating the Mac Pro and Mac mini?
 
Only 8 million, god must be hard to life with only ~ 740k a month...

Yve and Cook are the Sinofsky and Ballmer from Apple.

Like the old saying goes no king reigns supreme for ever, not even Arthas...
 
  • Like
Reactions: George Dawes
I will tell you what they did. They did more in their lifetime than some complainer like you. Come on dude your still using a mac mini. Time to move on. As for the Mac Pro even the older gen never got updated every year. Suppose you want a vga connection and optical audio output still.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AppleMiko



Apple's annual shareholders meeting will be held on February 28 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time in the Town Hall building at its Infinite Loop headquarters in Cupertino, California, according to an SEC document filed electronically today. Admission is open to all shareholders of record on a first come, first served basis.

tim_cook_hands_raised-800x328.jpg

A primary item of business on the agenda is to elect the Board of Directors to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders in 2018, with Apple nominating the same eight individuals currently serving on its board: Tim Cook, Al Gore, Bob Iger, James Bell, Andrea Jung, Art Levinson, Ron Sugar, and Sue Wagner.

The filing reveals Apple CEO Tim Cook made $8.7 million in 2016, down from $10.28 million in 2015 and $9.2 million in 2014. Cook's earnings included a base salary of $3 million, non-equity incentives of $5.37 million, and other compensation of nearly $378,000. Other named executives netted nearly $23 million apiece.

Apple Executive Compensation in 2016o Apple CEO Tim Cook: $8,747,719
o Apple CFO Luca Maestri: $22,803,569
o Apple retail chief Angela Ahrendts: $22,902,892
o Apple services chief Eddy Cue: $22,807,544
o Apple hardware engineering chief Dan Riccio: $22,807,544
o Apple general counsel Bruce Sewell: $22,807,544The filing did not disclose compensation for other key Apple executives such as design chief Jony Ive, operating chief Jeff Williams, software engineering chief Craig Federighi, and marketing chief Phil Schiller.

Apple noted it did not meet its target performance goals for both net sales and operating income in 2016, resulting in the senior executives receiving only 89.5% of their cash incentives. In 2015, the executives received 100% of their cash incentives as Apple met its performance goals for sales in that year.

Update: While Cook earned roughly $1.5 million less from his base salary and non-equity incentives in 2016, it was also the year in which he reached five years as CEO and unlocked nearly $137 million in previously-awarded stock bonuses tied to both his tenure and Apple's performance under his leadership. Accordingly, Cook earned roughly $145 million last year, his biggest payout yet as head of the company.

Article Link: Tim Cook's Pay Was $1.5 Million Less in 2016 as Apple Missed its Own Performance Targets



Apple's annual shareholders meeting will be held on February 28 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Time in the Town Hall building at its Infinite Loop headquarters in Cupertino, California, according to an SEC document filed electronically today. Admission is open to all shareholders of record on a first come, first served basis.

tim_cook_hands_raised-800x328.jpg

A primary item of business on the agenda is to elect the Board of Directors to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders in 2018, with Apple nominating the same eight individuals currently serving on its board: Tim Cook, Al Gore, Bob Iger, James Bell, Andrea Jung, Art Levinson, Ron Sugar, and Sue Wagner.

The filing reveals Apple CEO Tim Cook made $8.7 million in 2016, down from $10.28 million in 2015 and $9.2 million in 2014. Cook's earnings included a base salary of $3 million, non-equity incentives of $5.37 million, and other compensation of nearly $378,000. Other named executives netted nearly $23 million apiece.

Apple Executive Compensation in 2016o Apple CEO Tim Cook: $8,747,719
o Apple CFO Luca Maestri: $22,803,569
o Apple retail chief Angela Ahrendts: $22,902,892
o Apple services chief Eddy Cue: $22,807,544
o Apple hardware engineering chief Dan Riccio: $22,807,544
o Apple general counsel Bruce Sewell: $22,807,544The filing did not disclose compensation for other key Apple executives such as design chief Jony Ive, operating chief Jeff Williams, software engineering chief Craig Federighi, and marketing chief Phil Schiller.

Apple noted it did not meet its target performance goals for both net sales and operating income in 2016, resulting in the senior executives receiving only 89.5% of their cash incentives. In 2015, the executives received 100% of their cash incentives as Apple met its performance goals for sales in that year.

Update: While Cook earned roughly $1.5 million less from his base salary and non-equity incentives in 2016, it was also the year in which he reached five years as CEO and unlocked nearly $137 million in previously-awarded stock bonuses tied to both his tenure and Apple's performance under his leadership. Accordingly, Cook earned roughly $145 million last year, his biggest payout yet as head of the company.

Article Link: Tim Cook's Pay Was $1.5 Million Less in 2016 as Apple Missed its Own Performance Targets
 
Uh, yeah. Sarcasm for poor Tim aside, I really want to see the innovative Apple. Lately they have been the steady, profitable Apple. But that innovative Apple is who hooked me. I'm open to a sequel.
 
Half you tards probably don't even know how to pay your own bills. You would crumble at CEO of a company with 2 employees. Worrying about what executives did. Haha Get to their status and then talk. Talking about innovation. Some are talking about mac mini haha clueless nobody uses that anymore. Complaining about a headphone jack haha. Why don't you go back to rotary phone you
 
  • Like
Reactions: AppleMiko
Apple has $200b+ in cash. They are preparing to change the world in a massive way. Until then, they'll continue to earn profits by updating the amazing product that you currently own and most likely love. You'll continue to complain about why it's not enough and how Apple has changed, and how bad Tim is at running Apple.. but when it drops, and it will drop, you'll all hold Apple as holy again.

edited
 
Last edited:
Complain all you want but these guys at least earned their money honestly...by selling stuff to people who want their stuff.
Same can't be said for financial/bankster industry where top execs earn the same sort of money Just for their end of year bonuses. And by doing what?...finding new ways to gouge all of us.
 
Apple has $200b+ in cash. They are preparing to change the world in a massive way. Until then, they'll continue to earn profits by updating the amazing product that you currently own and most likely love. You'll continue to complain about why it's not enough and how Apple has changed, and how Tim sucks.. but when it drops, and it will drop, you'll all hold Apple as holy again.
I personally don't know how Tim sucks but if it's the same as his focus on the pipeline I don't let him try on me :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: clauzzz203
Complain all you want but these guys at least earned their money honestly...by selling stuff to people who want their stuff.
Same can't be said for financial/bankster industry where top execs earn the same sort of money Just for their end of year bonuses. And by doing what?...finding new ways to gouge all of us.
It's not honest to sell technology for the same price as it was released 4 years ago. It's even not honest telling your customers you care about environment and at the same time soldering and glueing everything together so if one thing is broken or needs an update you either have to buy new or throw it away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Demo Kit
Is Tim's pay much lower than other execs because he elected to take lower pay than other executives?
For someone who all the blame and flaming targets, it seems like the other Apple execs are having it easy despite not meeting performance goals :/

The short answer is that it isn't really lower than the other executives', at least not if we look at it over time rather than for a given year. The discrepancy has to do with how such things are reported.

The reason it looks lower (for, e.g., 2016) has to do with SEC rules relating to the timing of accounting for compensation. When it comes to the list you see in the OP, it doesn't necessarily mean that those people were actually paid that amount of money (of given that value in stock) during 2016. Stock awards are counted when they are granted, not when the employee receives (and perhaps sells) the stock. So an employee might actually receive $25 million in pay and stocks during a given year while their reported compensation (again, in accordance with normal reporting practices) is only $5 million. Or the reverse can happen, they might have a reported compensation of $25 million for a given year in which they only really received $5 million in pay and stocks.

Part of what gets reported in a given year may be compensation which, in effect, will be earned - and received - over the following 2 or 5 or 10 years. And part of what, in effect, gets earned - and received - in a given year may have been reported in previous years.

In Mr. Cook's case, the bulk of his compensation in recent years (and for the next 5 years) comes from a stock grant that he got when he became Apple's CEO 5+ years ago. It was structured (and later altered) such that he would receive it over a 10 year period and, for part of it, only if AAPL met certain performance measures. If you look at his reported income for 2011 it was almost $400 million. But he didn't receive (in pay or stock) anything near that much that year. He's getting some of that reported compensation (and more, because the stock price has gone up) now - last year, the year before, this year, next year and so on.

When it comes to the other executives in that list, a big part of their reported 2016 compensation ($20 million or so) will in effect be earned and received over then next 5 years. Then again, some of them received compensation this year which isn't included in their total because it came from grants they got in previous years.

Anyway... long story short... Mr. Cook isn't really making less than those other executives, he's making quite a bit more than them.
 
His salary is less of a concern for investors than missed performance targets (seriously, a couple million here or there is nothing to a company Apple's size). If 2017 is another lackluster year, I wouldn't be surprised if the board cleans house with the executive team.

Other than the board of directors have more intelligence than you and the average macrumours poster.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.