Obscene renumeration, especially Angela Ahrendts, who's done nothing to make Apple Stores more inviting or interesting and could be replaced for a 10th of the money by any number of retail execs.
Lol, I'm gonna go ahead and edit that post!
Well where is the proof of that? I haven't see any in yearsOther than the board of directors have more intelligence than you and the average macrumours poster.
Yeah, eventually Apple is so bad and force you to use other techs. There goes your privacy.He might not be the best CEO for Apple and he's definitelynot Steve, but his strong stance on protecting our privacy is what I like about him.
The customer is not always right, but they are always the customer.You're right about one thing. Gone are the days Apple was ahead of the pack by producing the best experience a customer could have. The best desktops, laptops, iPods, iPads, phones. Far ahead in OS, hardware and services. It has always been premium priced but the above arguments made it justified. That was the Apple that made me proud.
Fast forward 4 years later (today). Mediocre ancient hardware sold as new. Buggy software and crippled services. No focus and minimizing the volatile Apple ecosystem by discontinuing monitors, routers?, Mac Pro?.
My wish for 2017 is that Apple's income will nosedive so Cook & Co are forced to respond.
It's not about pleasing everyone... it's about pleasing your customers!
Thanks for the complete non-answer.
That’s a reasonable explanation. Although, I would expect a signing bonus to be much larger than a paltry $95,000.
Tim has a pretty nice stock option package. $378MM, awarded in 2011. Half vested in 2016, the othe half to be vested in 2021.
But at this level, it’s not about the salary and bonuses. It’s not about the money at all. When you have this much, you have all that you “need.” It’s about the game. The game of running the company.
Steve Jobs' prediction becomes reality except he's no longer around to save Apple.
Or a Steve Balmer!Cook is shaping up to be Sculley Mk 2
Only the in the minds of the utterly delusional.Scary....we might be reliving history
Why delusional? The video does bare resemblance to history, and it won't be the first time that history has repeated itself.Only MACRUMORS can write an article that says:
"Failure Tim Cook made 1.5million less because Apple sucks and doesn't listen to tech blog wannabes!"
and then in small print...
"he actually made 145 million more than he ever has"
[doublepost=1483735001][/doublepost]
Only the in the minds of the utterly delusional.
Maybe not better, but probably as good as!It's hilarious how many people here with no business sense or acumen think they can run Apple better than Tim Cook.
He runs the company, which is a varied and difficult role and encompasses many different things. He does not design and create new products, despite what people on many forums think.
Steve Jobs' prediction becomes reality except he's no longer around to save Apple.
I would love to know how those five people's yearly earnings compare to yearly earnings of all non-top-management employees of Foxconn.
Have you even heard of Fat Cat Wednesday? It was this Wednesday just gone. It's the day when the world's top paid have already earned more this calendar year than the average yearly wage of everyone else (£28,000 in the UK). 3 days into 2017 and they've already surpassed the majority.
I think that's a positive. Ballmer took Microsoft where gates didn't.Or a Steve Balmer!
Well those that think they could run Apple could always submit their resume, right?How do you know we don't know how to run a business ?
Never presume
Steve says a number of key things here:
1. He says when he was there Apple was never about making big profits. Apple always aimed for marginal profits and increases in market share.
2. And if someone doesn't pull a rabbit of a hat these companies (Apple) will glide down the slope.
Both to me highlight what Apple is doing right now, increasing their profit margins as much as they can, and paying the top guys mega $$ to be there.
And they have stopped innovation (also discussed in the video). The are just "gliding" on the products that they have and the user base that has been built up. But eventually that will begin to decrease.
I can see that happening with both the iPhone (iPhone 7, an iPhone 6s without the headphone jack) and certainly the Mac (Hello iMac, Mac Pro and Mac mini refresh please).
Sad that Steve predicted the demise of his own company again....
Let's not forget that Apple is kicking butt in chip design. Their latest, the W1, has completely changed the wireless headphone industry.
I think there is a flip side to lower sales - can we say that the iPhone 6 (designed under Cook's watch) was so well designed that more people decided they didn't need to upgrade? Is this a bad thing? From a consumer point of view do we really need to upgrade every year or every 2 years?
I for one think the iPhone 7 plus jet black is amazing, also designed under Cook's watch. This is the best iPhone I've ever had.
Mac OS is still by far my favorite OS - the continuity features are fantastic. I think when Intel gives Apple the chips it wants the new Macbooks will be fantastic.
Apple pay is solid - never had a problem with it - and it's expanding.
Home kit is terrific - I'm very happy they required security chips in all devises interfacing with it.
Only MACRUMORS can write an article that says:
"Failure Tim Cook made 1.5million less because Apple sucks and doesn't listen to tech blog wannabes!"
and then in small print...
"he actually made 145 million more than he ever has"
[doublepost=1483735001][/doublepost]
Only the in the minds of the utterly delusional.
This is what I always wonder as well. What was it Steve saw in him? He strikes me as being completely unlike Steve - clearly I know neither of them, but he seems like his priorities are everywhere but where they need to be while Steve was laser focused on providing the best experience and cutting anything that did not meet his standards. With Steve, it had to 'just work', with Tim I feel like it just needs to be profitable.don't worry he has plenty of money in the form of stock that he has gotten or is to come in the future. I don't think he is the right leader for Apple though. I am wondering why Steve suggested him to lead Apple