He did, but it killed him... Sleeping a few hours a night for 15 years can do that to you.
Cancer killed him, not his passion for the best product.
He did, but it killed him... Sleeping a few hours a night for 15 years can do that to you.
Pancreatic Cancer can kill randomly without and preexisting or underlying cause, but it can also manifest itself from other health problems or environmental causes, like stress and diet, drugs, alcohol etc... Steve INHO worked himself to death.Cancer killed him, not his passion for the best product.
Apple is selling more devices than ever. What is that if not increasing market share?
If anything, Tim Cook appears to be following Steve Job's guidebook.
All bills seem "thinner."
I think the variation of your question is this: Can one MISS $1.5million when...
$145 million vs. $146.5 million. Would one notice? Would one care?
Pancreatic Cancer can kill randomly without and preexisting or underlying cause, but it can also manifest itself from other health problems or environmental causes, like stress and diet, drugs, alcohol etc... Steve INHO worked himself to death.
This is the stuff Third World countries and revolutions are made of....
In 1965, the average CEO of a large company made 20 times what the average worker made. By 1989 the ratio had grown to 59 to 1 in 1989, then shot up to 376 to 1 in 2000.
Is Tim Cook worth anything close to what he is being paid? Are any of the others? I don't think so, and I think the whole system is nuts.
the decision by the major shareholders and higher ups was that Apple had figured out its "INNOVATION" and it was time to just make some cash.
Apple has all but abandoned the MacOS market, and has all the eggs in the iOS, iPad and iPhone market. Thats where the money is.
If the market gets shaken up and a decent replacement comes out for the iPhone and Apple was just making money off of phones and tablets, and all the MacOS users have gone over to windows or linux or chrome or BeOS or NeXT or whatever, then Apple could be screwed.
Tim Cook is not great for an innovative company, but he's great for making the margins and profits for iPhones greater and greater.
Apple as a computer company is "going down," but as a lifestyle and gadget company, its fine. And everyone knows Tim Cook is not a visionary, he's an accountant. That is all he ever has been.
AND if your sitting on 50b in cash a bean counting accountant is the best thing you could have, to keep that 50b.
Gotta be blind to not see the engineering innovation Apple has done over the last five years. You as a consumer may not like it, but you seriously cannot deny the innovation is an engineering feat.• Apple hardware engineering chief Dan Riccio: $22,807,544
That made me chuckle
For what !?!?!?
That right there is the problem ...
I'm glad you said "I don't think so," because clearly the market thinks so, and the market dictates CEO pricing, just how free agency in major sports (without incredibly stupid salary caps and spending limits) dictates the worth of a player's skills.This is the stuff Third World countries and revolutions are made of....
In 1965, the average CEO of a large company made 20 times what the average worker made. By 1989 the ratio had grown to 59 to 1 in 1989, then shot up to 376 to 1 in 2000.
Is Tim Cook worth anything close to what he is being paid? Are any of the others? I don't think so, and I think the whole system is nuts.
That's the whole point. Tim was never Apple's product guy to begin with, and therefore shouldn't be graded as such, much less compared with the late Steve Jobs.
Apple's product guy is, for all intents and purposes, Jony Ive and his team and like it or not, he's the best you've got.
Those ridiculous salaries could pay a lot of US employees making Apple products in the US.
Ive is an object designer. That's all he is. A product guy is the one that thinks of the next best thing and which one is it that can be attributed to Ive?
• Apple hardware engineering chief Dan Riccio: $22,807,544
That made me chuckle
For what !?!?!?
That right there is the problem ...
All of it.
Apple is a design-led company. This means that Ive and his team hold much of the final say in the company and pretty much get to dictate the final form of a product. The engineers then have to find a way to fit the specs they want into that form factor.
If you have wondered why the iPhone has ditched the headphone jack and looks to be dumping the home button next, look no further than Ive's desire for the iPhone to appear as nothing more than a single slab of glass. The new Apple accessories (Apple mouse, pencil, battery case) all have his signature on them. I won't be surprised if the engineers at Apple were handed the new MacBook Pro casing and told "how much battery you can cram inside is how much battery life the customers are going to get."
What do you think wearables and watches are, if not defined and differentiated by design? They were clearly Jony's pet projects as well. Cars and transportation? Also Jony Ive. Don't be surprised if Apple goes into the clothing line in the future courtesy of him as well.
Cancer killed him, not his passion for the best product.
For being in charge of all hardware development at Apple? WTF do you think he does (or ostensibly doesn't do)?
don't worry he has plenty of money in the form of stock that he has gotten or is to come in the future. I don't think he is the right leader for Apple though. I am wondering why Steve suggested him to lead Apple
This is sickening they make this exorbitant amount of money as a yearly salary while Apple store employees barely survive making under $35,000 a year! Really what do they do to deserve this $$$$ when it's the store employees who are ultimately generating the sales to pay these overpaid executives while low level store retail employees can barely make rent and buy groceries.
Angela made $23 million for what? Turning Apple into a fashion company? The watch that isn't selling as well?
Don't forget where it all started. Apple is a computer company, not a fashion brand. The two will not converge once computing power gathers pace again.
I bought the 2nd version of that machine and it was more than $2,000 at the time for maxed out RAM and an SSD. And you know what, it was the best laptop I've ever owned and still is useful to this day.How about Jobs introducing the MacBook Air with a single USB port, an 80 GB spinning disk, 2 GB of RAM, an anemic CPU that (unbelievably) caused laptop overheating. All for $1,800. You think that was not driven by cost? I remember all the whining when that came out.
Laptops are pretty commoditized as are smartphones these days as well. Perhaps Apple should just hang it up and retireHow about Apple getting out of the printer business years ago, a business that became incredibly commoditized with low cost printers, and one Apple could not compete in. Same thing with displays.
Nice to know you think that the MBP group had no idea what the iPhone group was planning and vice versa, and moreover really nice to know that you think it is acceptable to introduce user problems where there were none before. I am all in favor of the new USB-C standard, but then why not ship the iPhone 7 with a USB-C port or at very least make the lightening to power charger cable use USB-C. If they do not do this next year, your theory of a "transitions" issue will really be one of poor planning and customer insight.With respect to the MBP and iPhone working together, it seems you do not understand how transition periods work and there has never been perfection during past transitions. The MBP was released after the iPhone 7. There will always be a group of people not satisfied. Include the wrong cable, people whine. Include the other cable, people whine. Include both cables and people whine about Apple not caring about the environment and e-waste. Shocker...
Steve left his cancer untreated for a long time because he was too busy with Apple and didn't take it seriously enough at first.
If you read the whole article, it looks like Tim gets paid a lot less than other executives at Apple. So many angry people in here just posting negativity anytime his name comes up. He does not need to tie his salary so much to incentives, and I bet his 3 million base is significantly lower than other, much less successful CEO's.
I bought the 2nd version of that machine and it was more than $2,000 at the time for maxed out RAM and an SSD. And you know what, it was the best laptop I've ever owned and still is useful to this day.
Laptops are pretty commoditized as are smartphones these days as well. Perhaps Apple should just hang it up and retire
Nice to know you think that the MBP group had no idea what the iPhone group was planning and vice versa, and moreover really nice to know that you think it is acceptable to introduce user problems where there were none before. I am all in favor of the new USB-C standard, but then why not ship the iPhone 7 with a USB-C port or at very least make the lightening to power charger cable use USB-C. If they do not do this next year, your theory of a "transitions" issue will really be one of poor planning and customer insight.