An endless virtual screen wherever you turn your head would be a great feature. The "virtual" screen would also always be in focus. Try that with a 32 inch screen and old eyes.
The fixed perspective stereoscopy in 3D movies is fundamentally different than the head-tracked stereoscopy of VR.Will fail like 3DTVs and 3D Cinemas, but at least it will serve as a slingshot.
I get so tired of hearing comments like this, when people spend close to 3k on a high end iPhone, thousands on a new TV or AV equipment and thousands on computer hardware. YOU might not be able to afford it, but it will sell. People spend $US19 on an Apple rag!If that rumored $3000 price is real; no it won’t be a hit
Why do you use a snorkel when skiing?It's missing a snorkel
Yeah old Intel Macs running Windows or Linux over Bootcamp 🤣
There's no iPhone even close to 3k, though. The most expensive one is about half of that.I get so tired of hearing comments like this, when people spend close to 3k on a high end iPhone, thousands on a new TV or AV equipment and thousands on computer hardware. YOU might not be able to afford it, but it will sell. People spend $US19 on an Apple rag!
A lot of that can be solved by better refresh rates and overall better headsets. I felt awful using the Quest 2 until I picked up a 3rd party strap that moved the weight distribution to the rear, after that I stopped getting motion sickness unless I tried playing something that was far too fast and agressive to be usable on VR - some games really do not work at all in a VR setting.Unless Apple figures out the motion sickness issue some people (self included) have with VR, this is going to be a non-starter for some consumers.
I still expect it to end up being the best selling VR system though eventually.
Oh man that’s been playedIt's missing a snorkel
Water skiing?Why do you use a snorkel when skiing?
You have never skied in Australia.Why do you use a snorkel when skiing?
Right!…just posted a comment on that.![]()
Apple's New Thing (iPod)
Brief bullets of what's happening with the announcement of Apple's new digital device gathered from a variety of sources: Jobs reviews Apple's "digital hub" concept announced in January. Speaks of the Mac as the focal point of one's digital lifestyle. Jobs mentions early November as ship time...forums.macrumors.com
When you get bored, read that iPod thread from the day it was announced. Lots of people were saying similar things.
Maybe for you but it’s a big world outside your front doorIf that rumored $3000 price is real; no it won’t be a hit.
End of the day, you price high like that, you’ve got a niche product regardless of how cool it is.
The iPad, iPhone and iPod were wildly successful because they were cool, addressed a fairly ubiquitous use case, AND met a psychological, accessible price point.
Once you’re pricing north of $2000, the amount of possible buyers for anything “inessential” drops off a cliff.
Does the Mac Studio not count?Can they just put out new desktops already??
If a VR headset was comfortable enough and had optics and screens good enough that I’d rather use it than my OLED TV for watching movies/shows, and I could replicate my multi-monitor desktop computer anywhere with just the headset and a keyboard, I think a $3000 cost would be justifiable. I don’t think that quality will happen during the first generation, but I hope I am pleasantly surprised.If that rumored $3000 price is real; no it won’t be a hit.
End of the day, you price high like that, you’ve got a niche product regardless of how cool it is.
The iPad, iPhone and iPod were wildly successful because they were cool, addressed a fairly ubiquitous use case, AND met a psychological, accessible price point.
Once you’re pricing north of $2000, the amount of possible buyers for anything “inessential” drops off a cliff.
No. They need new all in ones. New iMacs. The wait is getting ridiculous.Does the Mac Studio not count?
Probably because we're beyond the point of it only being a rumor...Wow, this rumor just never dies, and keeps using the same old render.