I’ll be signing up. I have no problem paying a little to support Elon in his efforts.
It's taken 4K people to censor messages in the past, but now with censorship pared back to practically nothing, they will be of little use.I’ll pass. You can’t competently run Twitter with half of its workforce fired.
When everyone is verified, no one is verified.
Took me 2mins 10 years ago to set it aside. Along with the SnapTikTakGrams too as they appear.El-No.
Twitter is over.
It's just taken a while for most to realize this.
How do you know? Why on earth would it take 7,500 employees to run Twitter in the first place?I’ll pass. You can’t competently run Twitter with half of its workforce fired.
Lol good one.Great job Elon. Finally Twitter is back being the product instead of us….
Yeah, that was my thought. I readily pay to remove ads. Paying to reduce them really doesn't do it for me.Also, "pay us $7.99 a month and we'll show you half as many ads" is a bit of a request. For $7.99 a month I want no ads. I pay Tweetbot $9/year and get no ads.
They are better because you are paying for them... It's all about perception.. lolWondering what they mean by “better ads”?
Tweetbot has zero ads and is about $9/year. It's not got all the features of the official Twitter client - you can't vote in polls, approve followers if you're a protected account, etc. - but it's pretty good.When twitter will offer a option for zero adds then ill consider paying for twitter.
I'm nobody so i don't need that stupid blue check mark next to my twitter name.
All i need is no adds!
That relies on the assumption that most people are willing to pay $8 a month to use twitter…. Which is laughable.Verified accounts get priority in posts and replies. Bot accounts (being unverified) go to the bottom of the list, diminishing their value.
If the feature takes off, verified accounts will be the standard on the platform, in which case you can assume unverified are bots.
Could implement a user toggle to block all unverified accounts.
I read that they lost about $221m last year, that's $4.25m per week, not per day.The majority were dead weight. They were vastly overstaffed. It's why they were losing $4m a day.
These companies need to realize that canceling goes both ways. Supporters of Free Speech are also willing to cancel these companies for running away from free speech. Caving into a small minority mob is not always the smart thing to do.No way on earth is a flurry of 8 buck sign ups going to offset the MAJOR advertiser losses:
Read this:
There are a lot of companies that can function quit well with half the work force gone. Any company that has safe spaces and game rooms, lounges etc, has too many people employed.I’ll pass. You can’t competently run Twitter with half of its workforce fired.