The conclusion for me, is that there would now have to be a serious incentive to go with a 24-month contract with phone, considering the costs we're seeing, both 3G and 4G.
-There would have to be a serious subsidy of the phone (rather than the distributed cost + 'premium for effective loan' that these latest contracts show).
-Plus a better level of choice of what's in the contract.. (Unlimited minutes and texts are a waste for me.. I barely use 100 of each / month) but I do need data...
-Plus flexibility within the contract.. to change, to upgrade, whatever.
Otherwise, it's SIM-free phone + SIM-only contract (1 or 12 month) with the provider with the best reception for me, based on my home and work, and checking the
OFCOM mast locator.
I've been watching as some of the 5s contract details are released, and I'm yet to see anything that comes close to compensating for the 24-month lock-in. And when there are cheaper 1 month SIM-only deals out there, what is the incentive to sign up for 2 years? Okay, one down side is the up-front cost of the SIM-free phone.. but I should knock £200 off that by selling my current phone, and for me, the overall saving over the first year, let alone 2 years, plus the flexibility of a SIM-only contract, easily wins it for me.