I believe it has been documented that it was indeed stolen from Xerox I think it was.
Someone correct me if I am wrong.
That's what I've always understood
I believe it has been documented that it was indeed stolen from Xerox I think it was.
Someone correct me if I am wrong.
Well, he isn't asked to portray an actor so that shouldn't be a problem.I think the issue is not that Fassbender doesn't look like Steve Jobs, the issue is that Fassbender doesn't look like a good actor. Same with Seth Rogen.
I think the issue is not that Fassbender doesn't look like Steve Jobs, the issue is that Fassbender doesn't look like a good actor. Same with Seth Rogen.
I agree but I think once we reach old Steve then fastbender will look more like sj than Ashton. We will see.How do you know whether he pulls it off when the movie has not been released?
I'm going to have to disagree with you on this. Don't get me wrong, I like Fassbender, he's an excellent actor however he seems out of place in this movie.
Kutcher was good and his costumes/makeup in 'Jobs' were spot-on. However the film was utter yoghurt.
Hmm interested! Wasn't sure about Fassbender playing Jobs, I still don't think he looks or sounds the part but I still want to watch it.
Uh, nope. Getting quite tired of all these so-called Steve Jobs movies.Let's be honest - we're all going to see it.
I think it was "stolen".. With permission. http://zurb.com/article/801/steve-jobs-and-xerox-the-truth-about-inno .. So it really depends on your definition of stolen.I believe it has been documented that it was indeed stolen from Xerox I think it was.
Someone correct me if I am wrong.
I believe it has been documented that it was indeed stolen from Xerox I think it was.
Someone correct me if I am wrong.
Hopefully, this one isn't like the 'other' one in 2013 -_-
Correct. But is that really important to the story?I'm sorry but Fassbender has absolutely no resemblance to Jobs.
Not stole, used. With permission even. I believe jobs couldn't stand it when good tech was not utilised.I believe it has been documented that it was indeed stolen from Xerox I think it was.
Someone correct me if I am wrong.
It does seem a bit much.I find movies about him to be unnecessary. What other modern public figure has two movies released about them and two biographies?
I was going to say the same thing. Half way through the trailer I swear I was really watching Steve jobs.Funny, but when I watching the trailer, I bet I could see real Steve Jobs. I forgot that Jobs was different..
Good actors can act.
It was used with permissionI believe it has been documented that it was indeed stolen from Xerox I think it was.
Someone correct me if I am wrong.
"The interface was stolen..."
Bit it wasn't stolen, it was part of a deal where Xerox got a boatload of Apple IPO stock at preferential prices in exchange for letting Jobs et al use anything from PARC that looked good to them.
Why is this fact continually misrepresented?
If I were the head of Apple legal, I would be sending a nice letter to the studio to challenge the use of this mischaracterization.
To be fair they got trinkets to what would have been the mother of all patents. Kinda like how we gave beads to the Native Americans for the US.
Thanks. Getting really tired of the stolen meme.Well, lots of peoples like seeing it this way because it make a much better story and also because peoples like to see Job as a total ******* that build his own success on the shoulder of other.
The reality is that Xerox themselves we not really interested in building their own computers, and though that Apple would be better than them to create product using the technologies they had developed. So Xerox bought millions of $ of Apple stocks and part of the deal was that they would let Apple visit their research center.
Xerox later made a ******** of money with those stocks following Apple successes.
So no, they stole nothing.
The whole one other smaller movie that came out in the last 15 years or so?Uh, nope. Getting quite tired of all these so-called Steve Jobs movies.
Since none of us where there, and it's a matter of who you read, I guess no one really knows for sure.Well, lots of peoples like seeing it this way because it make a much better story and also because peoples like to see Job as a total ******* that build his own success on the shoulder of other.
The reality is that Xerox themselves we not really interested in building their own computers, and though that Apple would be better than them to create product using the technologies they had developed. So Xerox bought millions of $ of Apple stocks and part of the deal was that they would let Apple visit their research center.
Xerox later made a ******** of money with those stocks following Apple successes.
So no, they stole nothing.