My expectation has long been that the bottom model would not get a retina display. Hopefully other improvements, but not that--for the sake of keeping the entry price below $500. A retina display is worth a lot to people, but there’s a psychological barrier at 500 that I think Apple appreciates.
In fact, given the potential cost of building a retina display plus the RAM/processing power needed to drive it, I wouldn’t be surprised if only the top model (please 128GB!*) gets the retina display—at first. Depending on the volume they can make, using two different displays could increase the number of iPads that can be made.
* Actually, no, please no 128 model! I’d be unable to stop myself from buying it, and I’d prefer to wait a year
(It’s crazy that I want more space on my iPad than on my work Mac which only needs about 80MB occupied... I think I collect too many games! And if I delete them I'd lose my character/progress/scores in some cases.)
In fact, given the potential cost of building a retina display plus the RAM/processing power needed to drive it, I wouldn’t be surprised if only the top model (please 128GB!*) gets the retina display—at first. Depending on the volume they can make, using two different displays could increase the number of iPads that can be made.
* Actually, no, please no 128 model! I’d be unable to stop myself from buying it, and I’d prefer to wait a year
Last edited: