it was TOO expensive to begin with
On what planet?
apple tv is a complete bust to this point
Again, on what planet?
Apple's cash cow is apps.
Once again, on what planet?
it was TOO expensive to begin with
apple tv is a complete bust to this point
Apple's cash cow is apps.
The shipping rumor portion.
These iPads "could" be destined for tech companies for NDA previews. There may not be as many being shipped as people think.
That and the airports they are going to seem to be the hubs for news media.
NYC, L.A. , Chicago.
It doesn't matter where FedEx, UPS or Apple's shipments regularly go to. IF these freighters are full of only Apple iPads, then you can rest assured that special arrangements have been made to accommodate them. They would obviously need to go to secure holding areas until they are shipped to the various stores that sell them.
You don't know much about logistics, do you.
Roessnakhan said:Prediction: iPad 2 drops price to $399 and iPad 2X (for 2X resolution display) is launched at a higher price than previous generation.
A price hike is basically Apple saying "Hey, lets turn the tablet market into the PC market, we are tired of dominating it so lets price ourselves out of it and become a niche product again. We're tired of accumulating so much money!"
I'll probably end up paying and getting it anyway, only because I have the money and I like Apple's stuff, but a lot of casual buyers are going to look at $570 and then turn around and see an android tablet at $399 or $349 and wonder if the iPad is worth the 50% to 70% premium.
it was TOO expensive to begin with
I really don't mind the $79 (approx. 16%) price increase over the previous base model since my salary has increased by 16% too from last year...oh, wait it hasn't.![]()
If nothing else, Apple can make some money selling mice and keyboards. I feel sorry for them sometimes.
RE: The price,
I was under the impression the iPad 3 was more for professionals and would start at closer to $1k. The iPad 2 was planned to remain the more mainstream product. I am surprised the prices are as cheep as listed.
Some people are saying the iPad 3 might be canceled and replaced with an iPad III. The iPad III will be exactly the same as the iPad 3, only with a different name.
If it has a retina display, new/faster processor, and 8mp or more rear camera (at least if not better than the iphone 4s) and HD front facing camera (like on the MBP) then I would be okay with the slight price increase.
Hopefully some of the price increase is to help pay better wages for those factory workers.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A334 Safari/7534.48.3)
If true it could change the market. That puts a nearly 400 window between the kindle fire and the new iPad for other players to insert themselves. At 499 it is much harder to get I. There but this would open things up. Even if they keep the two it still allows competition to slip in there
Assuming the new models are more expensive, I can't believe people will pay for them.
I still don't get the lure of the iPad. It can't do what my Macbook does (e.g. watch videos and email at same time) and it is not portable cf. my iPhone for mobile use.
I understand its positioned in a mystical "third category", but it is clearly not designed with me and my needs in mind. I'm not "against" iPads, I just don't get them.
I'm curious - who will pay more (hypothetically, vis this article) for a new iPad, and what will it be used for primarily?
I don't understand the price-hike and definitely don't like it.
The prices didn't go up when apple replaced the iphone 3gs with the much improved and better looking iphone 4 with retina display. I jumped on the iphone 4 bandwagon right away because of that. Now with this price hike, I'm probably gonna wait a while and convince myself that I really want an ipad 3 rather than jump in (and I know I'll be in the minority).
I also want a pony.So, you all want:
- A bleeding-edge retina display
- In a shell no more than 1mm thicker than an iPad 2
- With LTE
- Made by people paid a respectable wage
- Made by people with an appreciating currency
And yet any price increase is a deal breaker?
Actually, they've been increasing wages. Not sure if Apple has changed how much they pay Foxconn, that's never really come up.May be they should take a little cut on the profit than cutting the wages of Poor foxconn worker.
Assuming the new models are more expensive, I can't believe people will pay for them.
I still don't get the lure of the iPad. It can't do what my Macbook does (e.g. watch videos and email at same time) and it is not portable cf. my iPhone for mobile use.
I understand its positioned in a mystical "third category", but it is clearly not designed with me and my needs in mind. I'm not "against" iPads, I just don't get them.
I'm curious - who will pay more (hypothetically, vis this article) for a new iPad, and what will it be used for primarily?
I still think that my theory is right, especially with this post and the A6 post on the homepage.
We'll see an iPad 2AND an iPad 3. The 2will be running an 'A5.5' basically the A5 with a speedbump. It'll be the $399 entry model.
The iPad 3 will use the A6 and a retina display and start at $499.