You could maybe invented a time machine to jump 30 years into the future for when battery technology that could even make this possible might exist...maybe.
This is the first of the design flaws in the rev 1 iWatch. Thanks for listening, Apple.
The other two for a reminder are:
2) Battery life a minimum of a week.
3) Always on display.
Then I might consider buying one.
Jumping down from the 28 nm process on the the S2 is going to make a massive difference in battery life, so they may be aiming at the same battery life with a smaller battery, which isn't necessarily a bad thing.Haha! This thing is already suck on battery life, now they want it 40% thinner? You must be kidding me!
The main thing id like in a new Apple Watch is accurate heart rate tracking during workout - its currently garbage. A real heart rate monitor says i'm doing 155bpm (which I bloody well feel) and the Apple Watch things i'm doing 55bpm...which lower than most peoples resting heart rate ffs!
Haha! This thing is already suck on battery life, now they want it 40% thinner? You must be kidding me!
my Asus Zenwatch has an AMOLED screen and is able to have "always on" time. I believe it shifts the "always on" watch faces by a few pixels every now and then to avoid burn in. It's also a simplified watch face when the watch is idle and then shows the full face when you move your wrist to look at it. I do wish my Apple Watch had always on, at least just a simple digital face with hours/minutes.
I'm a Watch owner. The Watch doesn't need to be any thinner. It needs to be faster with more HealthKit tie-ins other than movement and heartbeat.
It needs to be a LOT of things, but the LAST thing it needs to be is thinner.
I'd like to see a round, hybrid mechanical watch with a digital overlay. It needs to be much thinner and quite a bit smaller. Battery life needs to be a week, and it needs GPS and to be fully independent of the iPhone. Price needs to be about £150 ($250).
Then, I may consider buying one.
With due respect, Garmin Vivoactive, Pebble, Vector Watch Luna are some of the watches that do have a week-long battery life. Huawei, LG Urbane, Moto 360 are some of the watches that do have an always-on display.
And for everyone who bought a precious metal version of the Apple Watch, a big "**** you!" as you watch your un-upgradeable investment rapidly depreciate in vale.
How about they don't make it any thinner, but use that 'extra' space to put in better battery!
Now that would be great!
But it still won't brush your teeth or walk your dog.I'd like to see a round, hybrid mechanical watch with a digital overlay. It needs to be much thinner and quite a bit smaller. Battery life needs to be a week, and it needs GPS and to be fully independent of the iPhone. Price needs to be about £150 ($250).
Then, I may consider buying one.
Ok guys, calm down.
A bit thinner? Yes, I can see that but probably not that much!
WWDC? Unlikely, especially considering that Apple will preview WatchOS 3.0!
If for some reason Apple doesn't preview WatchOS 3.0 then we might get lucky and get to see Apple Watch 2 but I think that is very very slim and this analyst is just pure wrong.
In fact, bookmark this comment and you will see in June that all Apple will do is preview WatchOS 3.0 and thats about it. Unless they plan to preview Apple Watch 2 with release for September but that is unlikely!
Why? Apple will want to keep the software and hardware together just like they do with iPhones!