Can i at least jump to the conclusion that it is annoying to not know![]()
I'll second that. Well if it doesn't work then its petition/bust down apple's doors time.
Can i at least jump to the conclusion that it is annoying to not know![]()
I'll second that. Well if it doesn't work then its petition/bust down apple's doors time.
Hey timb,
I've just seen something rather worrying on barefeats
http://www.barefeats.com/york2.html
What are the chances of being able to re-flash the ROM to EFI32 if this is the case?
*edit* Also, what is the likelyhood of the ROM having been written to contain both 32 and 64 bit versions?
barefeats.com
"i to all. It's me, Rob-ART, at BareFeats.com.
I got the info on the EFI issue from Rob Barris at Blizzard (WoW). They wanted to upgrade all their Mac Pros with GeForce 8800s but were informed by Apple it would not work. They are very bummed.
Meanwhile, I've asked my contacts at ATI/AMD to look into this from their perspective since they have the new Mac Pros in house. In other words, is this an nVidia issue or does it affect ATI/AMD cards as well?
Meanwhile, I'm not canceling my order for the GeForce 8800 GT kit either just in case it can be addressed by a firmware patch or some such thing.
"
I don't know too much about company law but I would have thought that if the card is not compatiable then I think it's a clear abuse of market position.
From what has been said on this thread with regard to there being no technical reason why it need not be compatible, Apple would have only made it incompatiable to put pressure on current Mac Pro users to upgrade computers. They would not have done that if their customers could buy computers from someone else.
I think it's a fine line because the mac/PC market is quite unique but they would have overstepped it in this case.
Anyone want to take on Apple!!
(I bought a Mac Pro about 4 months ago with the standard graphics card with the intension of upgrading when a more up to date one became avaialable - like others on this forum I bought the Mac Pro and, and not an imac, because of it's upgradeability)
I don't know too much about company law but I would have thought that if the card is not compatiable then I think it's a clear abuse of market position.
From what has been said on this thread with regard to there being no technical reason why it need not be compatible, Apple would have only made it incompatiable to put pressure on current Mac Pro users to upgrade computers. They would not have done that if their customers could buy computers from someone else.
I think it's a fine line because the mac/PC market is quite unique but they would have overstepped it in this case.
Anyone want to take on Apple!!
(I bought a Mac Pro about 4 months ago with the standard graphics card with the intension of upgrading when a more up to date one became avaialable - like others on this forum I bought the Mac Pro and, and not an imac, because of it's upgradeability)
Technology changes people...get over it.
Technology changes people...get over it.
Technology changes people...get over it.
Technology changes people...get over it.
Hmm, a bit suprising comment coming from you,Movie?
So you support that apple about intently cripples the card and uses false advertizing to sell it to users that cant install it to their machines,like me?
As Advocate (and others have in other posts) stated,there is should not be direct reason the card couldnt be compatible with previous systems.
Intrested to hear your opininons why people should take that kind of shafting AND buy a new MP to replace a powerfull and wonderfully working unit.
Cheers.
You comment is neither relevant nor useful.