Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I get it's faster, but I love my $30 unlimited AT&T plan, I wish cell companies would still have unlimited plans!

Tim
 
From the press release:

"The company expects 4G LTE average data rates in real-world, loaded network environments to be 5 to 12 megabits per second (Mbps) on the downlink and 2 to 5 Mbps on the uplink."

Still a wide range, but this is WIRELESS. It's a hostile environment and changes by the second.

I like those figures, they set a reasonable expectation. Latency ("ping times") should be on par with cable modem so the experience should be at least comparable to being at home with a decent connection.

Those are pretty sad sppeds considering it's LTE, that's what I've been getting on my 3G USB dongle for a while. 30-50 Mbit/s should be the minimum for 4G, unless all you're loking to gain over 3G is latency.
 
Those are pretty sad sppeds considering it's LTE, that's what I've been getting on my 3G USB dongle for a while. 30-50 Mbit/s should be the minimum for 4G, unless all you're loking to gain over 3G is latency.

I do wonder if they're just throttling everyone to a max of, say, 12 down and 5 up. This would prevent the eventual disappointment as users load the network...
 
4G or not to 4G

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't SPRINT already begun rolling out its 4G program and beaten VERIZON and ATT?

I don't have SPRINT myself, but I know they are advertising in my market for 4G. I have no idea what handset it is or if there even is one yet.

Anybody know?

Yes, the EVO phone is on Sprint's network, advertised as a 4G-capable phone.

"4G" is being used a catch-all term to represent not-3G, but faster. Sprint and CLEAR make use of WiMAX, the competing 4G network to LTE. Even T-Mobile is trying to advertise its HPSA+ as 4G now, even though all of these technologies might be better described as 3.5G -- that just doesn't sound nearly as smooth as 4G, though.

Ironically, the ad below this post was for CLEAR's 4G service. :)
 
I wana see all the carriers get sued the hell out of them. The only carrier that cant is AT&T because they didn't call it 4g (yet) they will tho.
 
Those are pretty sad sppeds considering it's LTE, that's what I've been getting on my 3G USB dongle for a while. 30-50 Mbit/s should be the minimum for 4G, unless all you're loking to gain over 3G is latency.

LTE is not 4G. no matter what verizon says
 
Seriously, LTE is not 4G, WiMax is not 4G, NO ONE has 4G yet. It's all marketing hype.

Not totally true.

These are widely accepted as the fourth generation of cellular network designs:

1) Analog - first generation (AMPS, NAMPS and others)
2) First Digital era - Second Generation (GSM, PDC, USDC, CDMA) aka 2G
3) Second Digital era - Third Generation (EVDO, UMTS) aka 3G
4) Third Digital era - Fourth Generation (WiMax, LTE) aka 4G

That is, each of these networks internally and externally is very different from the one before.

Why the ITU had to step in front of the "4G" marketing freight train, I'll never know. They didn't make things clearer in any way.
 
I wana see all the carriers get sued the hell out of them. The only carrier that cant is AT&T because they didn't call it 4g (yet) they will tho.

Although they don't get a lot of discussion here, I love what T-Mobile did recently. Without making any real changes to their network, they came out and proclaimed their entire network is now 4G. Not even using LTE or Wi-MAX which MAY one day be part of the future 4G standard. Just the same 3G network on Sunday magically became 4G on Monday.
 
Although they don't get a lot of discussion here, I love what T-Mobile did recently. Without making any real changes to their network, they came out and proclaimed their entire network is now 4G.

Well, they DID make changes to their network, they went to a higher tier of HSPA+. I don't recall what speed they've gone to, but yes they did make real changes to their network.

I wouldn't call it 4G though, agreed there.
 
There are always exceptions like this, but they will be rare.

In an cross-country trip last summer, I can tell you I had Verizon EVDO coverage for all of it while HSPA coverage from AT&T only came into play in the major cities.

Bottom line, VzW will put LTE everywhere they have coverage. For now, AT&T only puts 3G in major population areas.

Stop defending either AT&T and Verizon. They both exaggerate about their coverage. So does Sprint and T-Mobile.

AT&T will take top dog. Verizon has no other company they can buy out to claim they've expanded their coverage map. Spring is dying. T-Mobile is always fast in Bellevue.
 
Absolutely terrible. $50/mo and it still has a 5GB cap. Total crap IMO.

Really?!?!?! AT&T's 5GB plan is $60/month. So why exactly is $50/month for a higher speed network that fails back to 3G with a more broad coverage than AT&T's 3G network "absolutely terrible"??? :rolleyes:

Stop defending either AT&T and Verizon. They both exaggerate about their coverage. So does Sprint and T-Mobile.

AT&T will take top dog. Verizon has no other company they can buy out to claim they've expanded their coverage map. Spring is dying. T-Mobile is always fast in Bellevue.

So what exactly will AT&T do to become top dog?
 
Stop defending either AT&T and Verizon. They both exaggerate about their coverage. So does Sprint and T-Mobile.

AT&T will take top dog. Verizon has no other company they can buy out to claim they've expanded their coverage map. Spring is dying. T-Mobile is always fast in Bellevue.

Not defending. Explaining.

There's a big difference.
 
So does this mean if Verizon releases an iPhone in January that it will use EVDO? EVDO can't utilize the data and voice networks simultaneously, or am I not understanding that correctly? I always thought that was the big reason Verizon didn't get the iPhone in the first place. The experience wouldn't be as good not being able to do both at the same time.

There are technologies that can be used to allow simultaneous voice & data on EVDO. Check out VoRA and SVDO.
 
From the press release:

"The company expects 4G LTE average data rates in real-world, loaded network environments to be 5 to 12 megabits per second (Mbps) on the downlink and 2 to 5 Mbps on the uplink."

Still a wide range, but this is WIRELESS. It's a hostile environment and changes by the second.

I like those figures, they set a reasonable expectation. Latency ("ping times") should be on par with cable modem so the experience should be at least comparable to being at home with a decent connection.

Bah, limited coverage and more expense for what is of little benefit over what I already have? I get about a 90ms ping, on the high side, but not terrible, and about 4 megs down and 2 megs up on my iPhone 4. How much speed do I honestly need on my phone?
 
in what year... will I be able to have unlimited data, at speeds of atleast 10Mb/s downstream......

side thought: today is december 1st, so the cdma iphone manufacturing should be starting?

How much speed do I honestly need on my phone?
I don't know how much do you need? Personally I would love to be able to tether my phones data to a laptop, when I am out in the wilderness or on the road. Then use my laptop very for lots of HD movie downloading and online gaming
 
Last edited:
I get it's faster, but I love my $30 unlimited AT&T plan, I wish cell companies would still have unlimited plans!

Tim

There is no $30 unlimited Data Connect plan.

You guys keep comparing phone data plans to laptop data plans. The $50/month plan listed here for Verizon is comparable to the $60/month data connect plan on AT&T.

Those are pretty sad sppeds considering it's LTE, that's what I've been getting on my 3G USB dongle for a while. 30-50 Mbit/s should be the minimum for 4G, unless all you're loking to gain over 3G is latency.

LTE is in it's infancy.

I wana see all the carriers get sued the hell out of them. The only carrier that cant is AT&T because they didn't call it 4g (yet) they will tho.

By whom and for what? There is no legal basis they can sue on.

Bah, limited coverage and more expense for what is of little benefit over what I already have? I get about a 90ms ping, on the high side, but not terrible, and about 4 megs down and 2 megs up on my iPhone 4. How much speed do I honestly need on my phone?

So you have a data connect plan for less then $50/month? And the coverage is still better. It includes all of Verizon's 3G coverage + 38 markets of LTE coverage.

And for the last time, this has nothing to do with phones (yet). This entire PR relates to laptop data plans only.
 
Not correct...

Not totally true.

These are widely accepted as the fourth generation of cellular network designs:
4) Third Digital era - Fourth Generation (WiMax, LTE) aka 4G

LTE and WiMAX are not 4G according to ITU-R. Only LTE Advanced1 and IMT-Advanced are 4G networks. This was announced by the ITU-R back in October.

Saying a turkey is an ostrich, because it's bigger (faster) than a chicken, doesn't make a turkey an ostrich.

-David
 
Last edited:
No one listens to the ITU's definitions in this topic.

For one thing, they're the same group that originally said EDGE was a 3G protocol, and later had to admit that no carrier on the planet advertised it as such.

Yup, I'm dropping my "LTE is not 4G" mantra since it appears that nobody listens to the ITU and their authority on the subject is questionable.
 
Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't SPRINT already begun rolling out its 4G program and beaten VERIZON and ATT?

I don't have SPRINT myself, but I know they are advertising in my market for 4G. I have no idea what handset it is or if there even is one yet.

Anybody know?

LTE>WiMAX
 
Their theoretical speed is 7.2 Mbps. In areas where I know HSPA+ has been deployed in conjunction with new Ethernet back-haul, I've reached tested speeds between 2 - 4 Mbps (using Speed Test app for the iPhone).

The iPhone does not support HSPA+. So the speeds you are getting are from the HSPA protocol.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.