Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The real difference in the US is that banks have spent millions and decades honing computerized fraud detection. Plus they make a ton of money charging for taking the fraud risks. That’s why they’re less worried about security measures. If security was perfect, they couldn’t charge as much.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It doesn't explicitly state that PIN will be enabled, but if it is, I'll be happy. I have two Chip&PIN priority cards; UNFCU and Target. Ventra (the Chicago transit system) provides contactless MasterCards that can be used outside the system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 0970373
When do we get wireless chips in the CC, similar to Apple pay? Just touch the card reader with the card and payment done. It's already available in Europe all over the place.
And has been for up to between 10-15 years depending on which country it is - the banking industry in the US has always been archaic, but at this point it's ridiculous.
 
It doesn't explicitly state that PIN will be enabled, but if it is, I'll be happy. I have two Chip&PIN priority cards; UNFCU and Target. Ventra (the Chicago transit system) provides contactless MasterCards that can be used outside the system.

That's probably unlikely since they're going away from chip and PIN for smaller transactions in other countries. But who knows?
 
I think perhaps this is the slow march towards that here in the US. First eliminate the signature because no one even checks anymore anyway. And then later as "added protection against fraud" require PINs like the rest of the world.

A number of US-based "chip and sign" cards are seemingly capable of being used in "chip and PIN" transactions - you just need to contact the bank and get it set up (obviously before traveling!). It's too bad they don't just do it by default.
 
When do we get wireless chips in the CC, similar to Apple pay? Just touch the card reader with the card and payment done. It's already available in Europe all over the place.

Capital One has it already. Not very well advertised though.
[doublepost=1515912075][/doublepost]
Completely getting rid of the signature doesn't work as well in a country where paying tips is ubiquitous. A lot of other countries either don't have this in their culture or they include standard service charge with the bill.

This. I too think this is the prime reason in the US. Off topic but only in the US I am stressed while traveling. How much to tip the waiter, how much to tip a cab, a baggage handler. I remember when I first visited US 10% in a restaurant was the norm, it became 15% and now it’s 20. Not sure why we are directly paying the wages of the waiters. Who was the first person to tip a baggage handler. Even a barber that owns his own shop expects a tip.

I was recently in Australia and nowhere there was an expectation of a tip. I guess they pay their employees well. New Zealand was the same.
 
It’s always quite jarring when I realise that shoppers in the US still need to write their signature on a slip of paper. We’ve had chip & pin (and the elimination of signatures) in Europe for almost 14 years now. It’s amazing it’s taking this long for the US to make the same progress.
 
Meanwhile, in Germany...

“Hey Apple”
“Hello!”
“When do we get Apple-Pay?”


*crickets*

Curious. Is it Apple's fault or your government/banks? I can't think of a reason Apple would specifically limit a market. They want to make money.
 
So those banking concerns who are converting their Visa credit cards to MasterCard should have waited? Or are the fees charged by Visa the reason some banking concerns have switched?
[doublepost=1515941355][/doublepost]
It’s always quite jarring when I realise that shoppers in the US still need to write their signature on a slip of paper. We’ve had chip & pin (and the elimination of signatures) in Europe for almost 14 years now. It’s amazing it’s taking this long for the US to make the same progress.
Do you in the UK have no ID theft? And we don't write / sign on a slip of paper - usually it's electronic.
 
Signature was still common in Canada when I was there this past week. Often not checked, but required nonetheless. This was at a resort so maybe they've had higher incidence of fraud.
 
This all seems good when using Apple Pay or other security technologies, 'A step up".

...but in which direction exactly....
 
MasterCard can follow suit any time now...

Read the article then. Visa was the industry’s last follower.
[doublepost=1515960011][/doublepost]
These cards have been available in the US for years. The have the contactless logo and you just bring it next to the terminal and it’s done. Ask your bank!

This is generally a standard feature of any chip equipped cc.

In our case, since we use ApplePay at all NFC equippedPOS terminals, we see the RF antenna in such cards as a liability (these can be scanned and copied by crooks when in your pocket), so we take two actions:
1. We request a card with chip but without the contactless feature (this is like 1/2 the ccs we’ve seen);
2. Where (1) is not possible, we disable the antenna. We hold the card up to a bright light to see where the antenna lead is buried in the card, and then punch thru the card near to where it attaches to the chip.

Apple Pay is used everywhere possible and where not, the chip on the plastic is.
[doublepost=1515961274][/doublepost]
It'll probably be a while. We tried them before but they ended up becoming such a scandal that most people would demand cards without that feature if banks just started issuing them again en masse. Even now people buy the RFID shields for their non-RFID chip cards because of the bad reputation.



Not really. Only a few banks issue them now, and they tend not to by default (or well, at least AmEx doesn't anyway) because of what I mentioned above.



Most countries are actually going away from chip entirely, at least for smaller purchases. I went to the UK a few months ago and everyone assumed I was paying with contactless/Apple Pay. Which was nice because nearly everyone supported it.

Considering that and the upcoming EU mandate for contactless support at terminals, I'm not so sure PIN's necessary anymore, at least in Europe anyway.
Actually the false start in the US with chip and contactless was due to:
1. Lack of coordination between the card issuers and the merchants. The card networks tried to import the tech from Europe (who had the bigger fraud problem earlier and thus developed the solution sooner) but the infrastructure to read a chip or RF antenna didn’t exist in the USA (and so few Yanks travelled outside the USA it didn’t make sense to equip every one of them with advanced cards when the mag stripe worked alongside the chip feature in foreign POS terminals);
2. Lack of cooperation from merchants. Who wants to spend to upgrade when there are no cards, and the card networks eat the cost of fraud.

Now with the liability shift from networks to merchants on non chip reading devices, US merchants have slowly begun the upgrade process.

In the US it’s said that 50-60% are there (yet most of the fuel industry missed their deadline of end-2016(7?) and got an extension to end-2018(IIRC).

Some big merchants, ie Costco, have new nfc equipped POS gear at till and pump but have not turned it on, others, ie Kroger, successfully tested in a single market but didn’t roll out investment and installation to other markets.

Ps we were told by Costco management, that the chip processes too slowly and raises the cost of a transaction by lowering thruput, and that Costco might just skip activating the chip in favor of only activating the nfc feature (this presumably would require Citibank to lift the upper limit trigger that requires a signature.) I’m not sure how they do this in Costco Canada stores because they have functional contactless card readers (but their own CapitolOne Costco MasterCard does not have a contactless feature. LoL.)

And then there are other countries that do accept contactless nearly everywhere, Sweden, UK, CA, AU, etc. where contactless is ubiquitous.
 
A number of US-based "chip and sign" cards are seemingly capable of being used in "chip and PIN" transactions - you just need to contact the bank and get it set up (obviously before traveling!). It's too bad they don't just do it by default.

Those aren't true Chip & Pin, it's ATM Pin so any purchase would be like a cash advance on your credit card. Any true chip & pin credit card would have you set it up from the beginning as it needs to be either embedded or enciphered into the actual chip or for call-back to the bank. But you can look up which cards offer true chip & pin here: http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php
 
Ps we were told by Costco management, that the chip processes too slowly and raises the cost of a transaction by lowering thruput, and that Costco might just skip activating the chip in favor of only activating the nfc feature (this presumably would require Citibank to lift the upper limit trigger that requires a signature.) I’m not sure how they do this in Costco Canada stores because they have functional contactless card readers (but their own CapitolOne Costco MasterCard does not have a contactless feature. LoL.)

Costco in the US has had contact EMV enabled since early 2017, and has already started enabling contactless EMV in some locations, with the full rollout supposed to complete "soon".

Costco in Canada has had both for a while (although they were one of the last major merchants to implement EMV - but they would lose the ability to process cards if they did not), and the Capital One Costco MasterCard does indeed have contactless

colossus-callout-double-en.jpg


The software changes needed for full support of Apple Pay/Android Pay are pretty intense.

Not really - if by full support you mean to support Device Verification (and therefore large value payments without additional verification), the support for this was built into the EMV contactless specs from each of the card networks for many years before Apple Pay existed. So in most places outside the US, this was a simple configuration change to some limits in the terminal.

The problem in the US is most contactless terminals, especially at large merchants, still only support mag-stripe-based contactless and therefore can't support this. This also means that many of these terminals are non-compliant with card network standards.
 
Because when you try and hold people to those standards it backfires. I used to work retail long ago, and I'd occasionally get a card that was completely unsigned. The card is not valid without a signature -- it's right on the damn thing. People would say they didn't want to sign it because they wanted their ID checked. I'd tell them they need to write "SEE ID" or something similar on it then. I'd point out as it is now, if their card was lost/stolen someone could just sign the card with their version of the customer's signature, and that would make the holder's efforts to improve their safety moot. Also, there would be people who try to come through and pay with a spouse's card and "sign for them" . That's not how this works either. The cardholder is only the person whose name is on the card. It doesn't matter if you're their spouse -- and it's not like I can verify you really are their spouse right there at the POS system. Retail employees are generally treated like dirt. If the customer raises a fuss about this, whose side do you think the manager is going to be on?

No, employees today aren't "less trained", they're just looking out for themselves. Easier to keep your head down and let the banks deal with it when there's a fraudulent purchase, than getting fired for making it hard for customers to give the store their money (which is how the business will view it).
Writing See ID is stupid as most places you run the card yourself. However at a lot of these places after running the card the screen says “Show card to cashier” which I’m guessing here is where they’re supposed to compare the signatures. Which of course they don’t.
[doublepost=1515982591][/doublepost]
It’s always quite jarring when I realise that shoppers in the US still need to write their signature on a slip of paper. We’ve had chip & pin (and the elimination of signatures) in Europe for almost 14 years now. It’s amazing it’s taking this long for the US to make the same progress.
It’s not a piece of paper. It’s an electronic pad, that also has a PIN pad on it. We do have chip & PIN, but only with debit cards.
[doublepost=1515982714][/doublepost]
Signature was still common in Canada when I was there this past week. Often not checked, but required nonetheless. This was at a resort so maybe they've had higher incidence of fraud.
Most resorts don’t have chip readers, even in countries with full chip acceptance like U.K.

Same with rental cars.

I never understood that but even outside the US they still swipe & sign in these instances.
 
Curious. Is it Apple's fault or your government/banks? I can't think of a reason Apple would specifically limit a market. They want to make money.
Apparently it’s because not enough Germans have credit cards, and because Apple’s smartphone share here is much lower than elsewhere. Only around 20% of smartphones in Germany are iPhones. Additionally, only around 15% or so of the EFTPOS machines here are capable of accepting contactless payment methods.
 
About the only change in Canada that is welcome is that you can use tap pay for over $100, but prior to this I haven't signed for a Visa purchase for years now.
 
Ps we were told by Costco management, that the chip processes too slowly and raises the cost of a transaction by lowering thruput
Hopefully that wasn't a recent conversation!

The solution to speeding up throughput with chip cards is Quick Chip. VISA came up with that, but all of the major brands support it.

With Quick Chip, the chip card can be inserted/removed while the cashier is ringing up the sale. You don't have to wait until the very end of the transaction to remove the card anymore...
 
Most resorts don’t have chip readers, even in countries with full chip acceptance like U.K.

Same with rental cars.

I never understood that but even outside the US they still swipe & sign in these instances.
I live in the UK and can't remember the last time I had to sign a Visa payment. Certainly not in the last five years possibly ten. That includes car hire.

(One single exception comes to mind. Making a Visa payment during a power cut where the cashier had dug out that clunky machine takes an imprint of the card. I doubt the majority of young people behind tills these days even know such things exist.)
 
I live in the UK and can't remember the last time I had to sign a Visa payment. Certainly not in the last five years possibly ten. That includes car hire.

(One single exception comes to mind. Making a Visa payment during a power cut where the cashier had dug out that clunky machine takes an imprint of the card. I doubt the majority of young people behind tills these days even know such things exist.)
I’m surprised that the card imprinter thing the cashier still knows how to use! Though we have a worse way, hand write the numbers so they can manually key it later!

I’m thankful we have chip and PIN for the most part now but people doing stuff like this negates the security of it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.