Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You can only upgrade to Windows 10 on the same machine, or VM, or etc.
If you for some reason erase your VM instead of formatting the existing disc you'll forever lose that key - which is generic, by the way.

Can you elaborate on that please? I was planning on importing the 8.1 VMDK into either Parallels or Fusion, doing the upgrade, extracting the Windows 10 key, deactivating that particular Parallels/Fusion installation and then using the extracted Windows 10 key for a clean installation into a new 10 VDMK. As I use only the VDMK Windows.
 
$200 for Windows Pro and another 80 to 90 for the VM software. Although Windows Pro is not worth anything above $5 bucks, it's still cheaper than buying a clone brand PC.
 
I really hate the fact that every time a new Windows OS comes out, VMWare charges me $50 to update just so I can use it. If I didn't have to use Windows programs for my work I wouldn't even bother.
 
So that Windows feature that will turn everything into a bot net and waste everyones internet usage.. the local network option allows updates to be shared between multiple devices on your network without downloading the files from the internet, thus saving you bandwidth. Turns your PC into a caching server for your local network. Thats a nice feature.


Another year, another VMware Fusion update. I have been using Mavericks as my host and Yosemite guests have regularly frozen for random periods then worked again. No updates to fix that but now a new version that will work with El Capitan. Fishy.
 
Can you elaborate on that please? I was planning on importing the 8.1 VMDK into either Parallels or Fusion, doing the upgrade, extracting the Windows 10 key, deactivating that particular Parallels/Fusion installation and then using the extracted Windows 10 key for a clean installation into a new 10 VDMK. As I use only the VDMK Windows.
That will not work. Updated Win10 licenses are tied to the machine you updated on (this is enforced server-side when activating). They don't have a key that can be used to install the OS on another machine. You can wipe the virtual disc and clean install into the same VM you used for updating though.
 
It's (was?) usually like this:
• Parallels is slightly faster (slightly more responsive, better 3D acceleration) and "feels" overal better as a Mac - app, where the Windows guest OS is well integrated.
• VMware has more "cross-platform" support as VMware is huge in the Server and Desktop virtual machine markets and "feels" better supported running other OSses besides Windows as guest-OS (Linux, and fun stuff like OPENSTEP, Rhapsody...)

If I had to choose between the two (which I don't... I actually use both...lol) it'll be Parallels.

I think that sums it up very nicely.

My biggest thing is smooth scrolling in Parrallels. Kind of gives windows a nice Mac feel.
 
What is better, Fusion 8 or Parallels 11?

It depends on what you want to use it for. Parallels has had a.reputation for faster graphics, Fusion has one for stability.
You can try both for free for a few days with no obligation.
They both get updated every year and if you're an existing customer it will still cost you to upgrade. So they can be expensive products to use.
 
I don't have windows currently installed at all. I want to try windows 10 but would rather not pay for it as I have a copy of windows 7. since I can't install windows 7 via bootcamp the only option seems to be to install it via VMware or Parallels and then upgrade that install to windows 10. I assume I can then take advantage of the free upgrade option. I just want to make sure that this is possible before going through all the trouble.

Oh yeah, you should be fine - my Win7 VM has been nagging me about upgrading to Win10 for weeks :) Now I will say that I ran the upgrade validator and it squawked about a video related issue, but this is apparently the fix:

http://kb.parallels.com/en/123053
 
  • Like
Reactions: cppguy
I do the same, and have been very pleasantly surprised to find PD9 works with El Capitan and Windows 10, so I won't be buying PD11. But I'm going to look seriously at Fusion because of it's 3 machine license. That's exactly right for me, and makes it considerably less expensive (as long as I don't have to buy Fusion every year either!)

Beware of past performance differences between Fusion and Parallels typically Fusion is 1 or 2 whole versions of Parallels behind in terms of performance... Also, i've found that upgrading EVERY version of Parallels is only great for Parallels pocket books but just like every other version of Windows is crappy the same could be said in terms of Parallels where upgrading every other major version sees enough speed or other improvements to justify the price...

I upgraded a couple clients from Parallels 9 to 11 and saw a NICE boost in speed in every area... as for 10 to 11 - not soooo noticeable but still a bump.

Cheers,

Emmanuel.
P.S.: and no I don't work for Parallels, I even started with VMWare Fusion as I know the guy who wrote the first 500+ lines of code for it... VMWare just hasn't consistently kept up with Fusion as Parallels as with their product line...
 

For some reasons both VMWare and Parallels have been stuck in Direct X 9 and 10 for a long while - it seems particularly difficult for them to get past even Direct X 10 support has been long time coming and partial... I assume it must be in how DirectX 11 and 12 talk directly to the hardware ?
 
Any promo codes for Fusion 8? :p

(Don't get me wrong, I don't mind paying - the 50€ price is just a little too high. Around 35-40€ would be quite OK)
 
Try Canada... sigh...

They say Parallels has better performance



I live in the middle east. One ISP has $53 offer for 200GB bandwidth limit/month. Thats supposed to be bleeding edge of offers.

Most ISPs in the U.S. have data caps but they're usually quite generous and are not enforced unless you go way over or go over month after month. I got a warning from my provider (Cox) one month when I went over. I was trying to upgrade Windows - from 7 to 8 - on one of my computers but there was a bug in the upgrade process so it ended up re-downloading the OS over and over. I started the process in the evening, left it running overnight, and went to work before I could check the progress so it downloaded Windows over and over for 24 hours before I had time to see what it was doing and stop it. So that was about 200 GB in a day plus I re-downloaded a lot of games through Steam etc. so I went over the 250GB cap. Cox sent me an email saying I went over and should check to make sure I didn't have a virus (I did, it was called Windows); or, if I needed more data, I should consider switching to a business plan.

A lot of other countries have lower data caps.


Unfortunately no, here in the US! Comcast has data caps in place in the Atlanta, GA area and a few other "select" cities. They claim it's to our benefit. I can't even do OS updates without worrying if I'm going to exceed my cap, which I have done many time. One month, I synced my photos with Apple Photos and did some extra Netflix streaming, had to pay $170 OVER my normal cable/internet bill. I was NOT happy.
Most everyone I know in Atlanta is waiting for Google Fiber to be put in and then it's GOODBYE Comcast. Of course, at that point they will come out with a lift of the cap and say they "listened to customer feedback"...

Damn :/
 
I'm getting a bit annoyed with VMware and Parallels using the yearly OS X release cycle as an excuse to push very expensive updates witch are marginally better. But hey, it's mostly companies who buy these things with enough cash to burn. They're definitely making good use of that.

That might be true of some companies, but it totally sucks for startups like mine. I have to fight pretty hard to get budget for software upgrades, and VMWare is one of the worst offenders for us. :(
 
What is better, Fusion 8 or Parallels 11?
From what I've seen in the past, Parallels performs a little better however working with VMWare products at work and at home, it's far easier to migrate a VM to many platforms with VMWare. I'm also not a fan of how many changes Parallels does to you Mac. So overall I prefer Fusion but it's kind of hard to make that decision for someone else.
 
Bad comparison because although both of those products were better, they weren't outselling their competitor, unlike PS4 which is greatly whopping the Xbox One. So it's a win win for Sony and it's customers, better machine and better seller. :)

Machine maybe physically better, however feature wise I still think the Xbox One is ahead, the ability to snap between apps, TV control and the Xbox pad still lead it ahead for me.

Although I would have both if my wife wouldn't scream at me for buying another ha ha.
 
What is better, Fusion 8 or Parallels 11?
Wait Parallels 11 came out already? I hate yearly paid updates. Personally, I prefered the performance of Parallels 11, but it might be because I had an old computer, I dunno.

Wait what, its 2015 and some ISPs still have bandwidth limit, i thought that was only on mobile networks :|
In Canada, some companies give no unlimited bandwidth (Videotron), only on 150$ plans (Bell), or something which doubles your monthly bill (everything else). I wish these ass-f***** monopolies would stop existing and die already.
 
Interesting that the article was updated in August 2015 but OS X Yosemite 10.10 is not mentioned. Mac OS X Mavericks 10.9 is the highest version. Wonder if Yosemite will work or if it's been intentionally left out.

Read the article again; among its links are "Installing OS X 10.10 Yosemite as a guest operating system in VMware Fusion (2082109)".
 
Did the Pro version go up in price for both full and upgrade or is it just me? I remember paying like 60 bucks to upgrade my pro when I got version 7.

Does 8 Pro allow you to control esxi servers yet? I thought 7 did but it was just the ability to power up and down VM's. vmware did a ****** job explaining it.
 
I paid $70 to upgrade to version 7 less than a year ago, and paid to upgrade to version 6 less than 6 months before that. Now they want $49 for me to upgrade to version 8 and are offering... very minor improvements and (hopefully) bug fixes to the issues that are driving me nuts in 7.

Looks like I have to pay but I'm extremely unhappy. Looks like VMWare wants to become the next Adobe. Make a good product, stop innovating, and start shamelessly milking your customers for every penny you can.
 


Fusion 8 and Fusion 8 Pro are optimized for the latest Macs, including the iMac with Retina 5K Display and 12-inch MacBook. DirectX 10 support enables Mac users to run Windows virtual machines with native resolution on a 5K display,
Can someone explain this to me? Does that mean that text and images will be the normal size on a Retina Mac, but with crisper, denser clarity? Or does it mean that you'll get tiny text and a gazillion rows and columns in Excel?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.