1. where is that data from? cause I think the power consumption (light usage for battery life) of iris is about the same as hd 4600 + deactivated dGPU
2. nope. only in a few categories. Look at the iMac lineup. Iris Pro is "good enough" for GT640m but not Gt 650m/750m or anything higher
3. Yes that's true, BUT Iris Pro is expensive too
4. that's totally wrong. MBP went from 2010 integrated+ GT 320/330m to Intel 3000 AND AMD dGPU!
- You are talking about the Mac Minis where they did what you stated. Mac Mini is NOT a Pro device![]()
1. + 2.: Source: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6993/intel-iris-pro-5200-graphics-review-core-i74950hq-tested/20
3. True
4. No it's not totally. But I forgot to mention that this was of course only the case for the 13''. People didn't like it this time and started to claim "it's not pro anymore". Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Pro