replyI think no matter how you spin it, buying any of the 2015 or 2014 Pros at any time was an exercise in outdated tech. If there's even a conversation to be had arguing why a 2016 MBP is a good buy right now regardless of your circumstance then whoever is making that point doesn't really know where hardware is at and what the costs are. They're solely looking at their own situation and it's difficult to have a meaningful conversation with that mentality. Apples laptop lineup is outdated and over priced. At this point, especially in this thread, everyone should get that by now.
The other way to look at it, is the 2015 was the pinnacle of the Retine MacBook Pro line. It was refined, troubleshooted and perfected to its final form. Yes, a Broadwell processor suitable for the 2015 model was just a month or two away, but at that moment it was the best Apple could create.
In the past, Apple has release one final version of its MacBook Pro to coincide with a redesign. I believe Apple will release FOUR MacBook Pro versions in October. A 13 and 15 inch Retina MacBook Pro (rMBP) with Skylake 6770, and a 13 and 15 inch Dynamic/OLED/Usb-C/whatever MacBook Pro (dMBP).
And the cheaper rMBP with Skylake will be a major temptation for many people here. Existing design, perfected: legacy ports intact, the old keyboard untouched and an old but well-loved form factor all with Skylake speed.
But the practical difference for most use cases between Haswell and Skylake H-Series processors isn't THAT big. Certainly not big enough to warrant all this moaning about how outdated they are.
Exactly! I like to by 3rd or even 4th Generation DONE DONE DONE products, that are in my eyes (YES biased) Finalized. And I want to add a model to "my collection" that has all the pieces of that ERA, I am NOT an early adopter. And seriously we could round and round over the benefits of being an Early Adopter versus a Late Bloomer. It's 50/50 it depends on how you shop.
I come here looking to see: Oh they're getting rid of this, they're getting rid of that:
Oh, time to buy the LATEST and LAST GREATEST that can do all that I want for the next 5 years, not a science project that some early adopter would love to get and enjoy tinkering with and struggling with.
You got two perspectives here, can't you see that? I mean yeah if you are an early adopter, that buys Product D, at Gen 1 then Gen 2 then Gen 3 every year cause you have the money, or like to hustle on eBay, then that's great for you. But some people like to come in at Gen 3 and sit and wait 2-3-4 years waiting for Product E, at Gen 2 or 3 again.
But if you just buy Gen 1 then get Gen 2 then get Gen 3 then turn right around for another dose of Gen 1 and Gen 2 then Gen 3, again, In my eyes (biased) you aren't really doing anything but opening boxes and doing speed tests, benchmarks, boot times, etc, and then waiting for the next Generation, which is a waste in my eyes. (Oh this one boots 2 seconds faster, 38 seconds versus 36 second, AWESOME!) yeah right.
I like Gen 2 or 3 wait for 4 years, using just that model and breaking it in customizing etc blah blah. Learning all the tricks I need with that model, not just going to the next one year in and year out...
Early adopters versus Late bloomers, plain and simple...
Last edited: