Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
If that is the chip we will be seeing in the MacBook, it's kind of underwhelming even for a Polaris 11

That's not saying much given how pathetic the dGPU in the current (lol) MacBook Pros is..

Normally yes but the current MBP is packed with dinosaur technology, even archaeologists would have trouble pinpointing it's age.

As @Mattsasa properly said, the point is that the MBP always was and always will be an Ultrabook.
It is a compromise and a very good balance between portability, power and battery life.
I completely agree that the present dGPU is crap, as is less powerful than a GTX 950M, but the upcoming (hopefully) dGPU is going to use 35W, with performances higher than a 960/965M.

in two words: the new MBP is going to be seriously more powerful, but also lighter than the current one.
And right now, there is no alternative mobile GPU suitable, as all the Mobile NVIDIAs have too high power consumption.
I, for once, believe that this upcoming MBP will have a serious amount of power.
Keep in mind also that Ming Chi Kuo and the anonymous source from Bloomberg said that this upgrade is going to be "the most significant" of the MBP.
It could be really true.
:)
 
regarding the ESC key and the FN keys, we should remember that they probably have to make a separate slot for the touch id power button, right? so im thinking, what if the ESC key is still physical and placed on the top left of the keyboard, then the keys F1-F12 are on the OLED, and the physical power button with the touch id ring around it is also a physical button placed on the top right of the keyboard. would that make sense?

basically, the OLED is the 12 FN keys, and to its right and left, there is a physical key of some kind.
Wouldn't it be better if apple put the Touch ID in the trackpad?
 
As @Mattsasa properly said, the point is that the MBP always was and always will be an Ultrabook.
It is a compromise and a very good balance between portability, power and battery life.
I completely agree that the present dGPU is crap, as is less powerful than a GTX 950M, but the upcoming (hopefully) dGPU is going to use 35W, with performances higher than a 960/965M.

in two words: the new MBP is going to be seriously more powerful, but also lighter than the current one.
And right now, there is no alternative mobile GPU suitable, as all the Mobile NVIDIAs have too high power consumption.
I, for once, believe that this upcoming MBP will have a serious amount of power.
Keep in mind also that Ming Chi Kuo and the anonymous source from Bloomberg said that this upgrade is going to be "the most significant" of the MBP.
It could be really true.
:)

I hope you are right Wrong, and is in the line of what I expect too [although just more powerful in terms of graphics, not that much in the cpu department]

There may be some difficult decisions to make for me if they really come to the party and release everything - maxed imac and 13" mbp or maxed 15" and 5k display.

To be honest, I cant wait for this thread to end, and I can shift my obsessions onto something else. It has become a little too addictive for me and draws way too much of my time:)
 
Last edited:
Will the new dGPU 15" MBPs also have an internal Graphic chipset? To avoid too heavy battery drain the dGPU would only being used when needed. Isn't this the current dMBP setup? Which internal GPU would it be then? Same Intel Iris?
 
Wouldn't it be better if apple put the Touch ID in the trackpad?
Where, like in the center of it? That might work, but it would be a bit tedious imo. with the power button, you know exactly where you have to rest your finger. unless apple puts a round ring in the middle of the trackpad (that doesnt mess with force click either), i would imagine its hard to know where exactly to rest your finger.
[doublepost=1475183679][/doublepost]
Of course, it's a personal choice and that's cool, but unless you really must have a new laptop right now, it's pretty silly to buy today when there's a 98% chance new MBPs will be announced in the next 10-20 days. And even if you had to have today's model for some reason, you could have gotten it for a lot less in a few weeks.

Not saying this to poke fun at you, just bringing it up for the sake of others.
Can he return it within the return policy and then buy the new ones? if the time frames align, of course.
 
I don't know how chipsets work...but given Apple's success with it's A-series chips for iOS, is it possible for Apple to provide their own dGPU that works alongside an Intel CPU?
 
Where, like in the center of it? That might work, but it would be a bit tedious imo. with the power button, you know exactly where you have to rest your finger. unless apple puts a round ring in the middle of the trackpad (that doesnt mess with force click either), i would imagine its hard to know where exactly to rest your finger.
[doublepost=1475183679][/doublepost]
Can he return it within the return policy and then buy the new ones? if the time frames align, of course.
The ring on the home button I think is capacitive and is just to know when something is actually there. A trackpad wouldn't need that. As for where on the trackpad I would assume they would be able to make the whole thing a sensor.
 
Where, like in the center of it? That might work, but it would be a bit tedious imo. with the power button, you know exactly where you have to rest your finger. unless apple puts a round ring in the middle of the trackpad (that doesnt mess with force click either), i would imagine its hard to know where exactly to rest your finger.
[doublepost=1475183679][/doublepost]
Can he return it within the return policy and then buy the new ones? if the time frames align, of course.
possibly the technology they are going to use in the iPhone 8 where it doesnt matter where you put your finger on the screen so don't need a specific location or button for it. Speculation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: benutzername
I don't know how chipsets work...but given Apple's success with it's A-series chips for iOS, is it possible for Apple to provide their own dGPU that works alongside an Intel CPU?

Intriguing Idea. I have never thought of this before. But yea Apple makes great A-series CPU/GPUs. Probably performance per watt, more powerful than intel/nvidia/amd/ etc. Apple could make a dGPU along side an intel chip, why would have to make their own mac drivers for that, which shouldn't be an issue. However, it would probably break the option to bootcamp.

Though it seems this is not Apple's plans since it seems they are making plans with Nvidia again for future macs.
 
I don't know how chipsets work...but given Apple's success with it's A-series chips for iOS, is it possible for Apple to provide their own dGPU that works alongside an Intel CPU?

The GPU in the A-series chips are not Apple's own design. They are using PowerVR GPUs from Imagination Technologies. These GPUs are designed for low power but can be scaled up. The iPhone 7 have a 6 cluster GPU with compute power expected to be around 300 GFLOPS. The iPad Pro have 12 clusters and Imagination Technologies have up to 16 cluster chips.

They can put a 16 cluster with higher clock speed in a MBP but I doubt that would make it much faster than the Iris iGPU that is already available inside the Intel chip. If PowerVR or any other mobile GPU can scale up and compete with AMD or Nvidia then I suspect we would have already seen them in laptops.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stickrunner
This is what they had almost 2 years ago: http://www.anandtech.com/show/8706/imagination-announces-powervr-series7-gpus-series7xt-series7xe/2

7XT_SKUs_575px.png


Finally the 16 cluster configuration would be targeted at non-traditional spaces for PowerVR products, such as full notebooks, dedicated (set-top) gaming devices, and servers. With a hefty 512 FP32 ALUs Imagination expects that the 16 cluster configuration should rival lower-end discrete GPUs, which would certainly be the competition for the device categories that Imagination is chasing.
 
I don't know what Best Buy's return policy is. I haven't stepped foot into one of their stores in over 20 years!

I want to say its 14 days.

The GPU in the A-series chips are not Apple's own design. They are using PowerVR GPUs from Imagination Technologies. These GPUs are designed for low power but can be scaled up. The iPhone 7 have a 6 cluster GPU with compute power expected to be around 300 GFLOPS. The iPad Pro have 12 clusters and Imagination Technologies have up to 16 cluster chips.

They can put a 16 cluster with higher clock speed in a MBP but I doubt that would make it much faster than the Iris iGPU that is already available inside the Intel chip. If PowerVR or any other mobile GPU can scale up and compete with AMD or Nvidia then I suspect we would have already seen them in laptops.

Ah, forgot about that. And thank you for explaining this.

Though I am wondering the PowerVR GPUs are used in most smartphone and tablet GPUs or atleast many of them. How come the graphics performance is highest in the Apple A-series chips.

Is it because apple scales them up more, or uses more of them? Or apple integrates them into the chip better?
It can't just be iOS is faster on them?

You can obviously tell I don't understand how this works.
[doublepost=1475186394][/doublepost]
Hmm,

SO they can beat lower-end discrete GPUs. Probably not much of market for them than. because intel and AMDs integrated GPUs are beating lower end discrete GPUs.

Maybe in the not too distant future they can rival higher end discrete GPUs? ]\
 
9to5mac.com poll "Will you be buying the 2016 Macbook Pro"?
https://9to5mac.com/2016/09/29/2016-macbook-pro-launch-date-features/

Total votes: 7,298

Take my Money! - 56.32% (4110 votes)

Probably- 20.12% (1468 votes)

Maybe/Unsure- 11.83% (863 votes)

No- 6.39% (466 votes)

Unlikely- 4.48% (327 votes)

Other(see comments)- 0.86% (64 votes)

Guess people as a majority are positively receptive as a whole to the new purported features. "No" only accounted for 6.4%, or 314 out of 6,981 votes. Butterfly Keyboard, Thinner, Lighter, USB-C only, OLED Touchbar, TouchID for the win, and it is Apple's design philosophy moving forward.
 
Last edited:
9to5mac.com poll "Will you be buying the 2016 Macbook Pro"?
https://9to5mac.com/2016/09/29/2016-macbook-pro-launch-date-features/

Total votes: 6,981

Take my Money! - 56.14% (3919 votes)

Probably- 20.13% (1405 votes)

Maybe/Unsure- 11.95% (834 votes)

No- 6.4% (314 votes)

Other(see comments)- 0.88% (62 votes)

Guess people as a majority are positively receptive as a whole to the new purported features.

Only 6.4% of people visiting that site are not buying a 2016 MBP... Wow
 
The ring on the home button I think is capacitive and is just to know when something is actually there. A trackpad wouldn't need that. As for where on the trackpad I would assume they would be able to make the whole thing a sensor.
The user would still need some visual indication of where exactly their finger is supposed to go (I don't think it is technically feasible yet to have the entire trackpad read a fingerprint in any orientation)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mahcus36
The Macbook Air also has the new Sierra wallpaper, and there are rumors the MB Air will also be refreshed in October so that would be weird.

I strongly doubt that the MBA is being refreshed in its present form. The present MBA's use a Broadwell processor with HD 6000 graphics (48 execution units).

With Skylake, Apple would have to choose between HD 520 (just 24 execution units) or Iris 540/550 (48 execution units and eDRAM cache). One is a performance downgrade, the other is a cost upgrade.

So, if there's a replacement for the MBA, it'll be different. Perhaps a low cost MBP 13? Maybe the rumored 13" rMB? At the same time, given Apple's penchant for selling obsolete systems, the current MBA might be available unchanged for another year or two.
 
I want to say its 14 days.



Ah, forgot about that. And thank you for explaining this.

Though I am wondering the PowerVR GPUs are used in most smartphone and tablet GPUs or atleast many of them. How come the graphics performance is highest in the Apple A-series chips.

Is it because apple scales them up more, or uses more of them? Or apple integrates them into the chip better?
It can't just be iOS is faster on them?

You can obviously tell I don't understand how this works.
[doublepost=1475186394][/doublepost]
Hmm,

SO they can beat lower-end discrete GPUs. Probably not much of market for them than. because intel and AMDs integrated GPUs are beating lower end discrete GPUs.

Maybe in the not too distant future they can rival higher end discrete GPUs? ]\

I don't know much about mobile GPUs but I think almost all Android phones are either using Qualcomm Adreno, ARM Mali or NVidia Tegra. I think only Apple is using PowerVR right now. But I wouldn't say Apple has the best mobile GPUs, there were many phones last year that performed better at off-screen benchmarks than the iPhone 6s.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.