Why not?
Macbook Air 11 / 13
Macbook 13
Macbook Pro 14 / 16
I agree. I had a 13" for three years and apart from lack of graphics power, it was also the lack of screen real estate that made me tire of it in the end. 1200x800 just isn't enough. That's why I'll definitely be getting a 15" this time around (plus I want a quad-core processor and dGPU).
Just checked online with one of UK's biggest electronic retailers (Currys) and they have a few Macs unavailable for delivery.
11" Air, 256GB
13" MBP, 256GB
13" MBP, 512GB
12" MB 256GB Rose gold
Interestingly all of the above are listed as 'unavailable for delivery' but do have instore pickup available at some locations. I live in a corner of the UK and none of my local stores have them.
Also the 12" MB 512GB Rose Gold is listed 'Out of stock' rather than just 'unavailable'.
Damn, we went full-circle with the 12/14/16 vs. 12/13/15 debate again. I can feel the nostalgia kicking in.
My thoughts:
12" Macbook (price drop now, 15w Kaby Lake in March)
13" Macbook Air (25w Kaby Lake, no OLED)
13" Macbook Pro (Skylake Iris + ARM SOC for OLED)
15" Macbook Pro (Skylake Iris Pro + ARM SOC for OLED)
I don't think the rMBP had any leaks. I could be wrongThis is unprecedented! No leakssss since the 13" aluminum casing!!
So, after many failed Windows machines(more so dell and lenovos) I have finally decided to switch to a Macbook pro. Coincidentally my recent device failed a week back and I have been looking for a replacement. These recent rumors going around about a refreshed line of MacBooks have got my attention. Having decided on a MBP, and given that the new models would launch this month, I would like to know how long does it usually take for them to hit stores. /Basically, I am without a laptop until then. Or, would any of you for any reason suggest going with current line of MBP
I don't think the rMBP had any leaks. I could be wrong
That's probably due to the National Day holiday in China, aka the Golden Week.All preconfigured iMac and MacBook Pro models on apple.ca aren't shipping until next Thursday, and I live very close to Toronto; they usually ship in a day or so...
No they would call them the ArmBooks, but that's probably like 2018-19.MacPad Air 13"
I've been thinking that this is what it'll be for a while now.Calling it.
13" - loses the Pro moniker, thinner, lighter, blah blah, less ports. Just another Macbook.
15" - still "Pro", various configurations, dGPU options as usual, more ports.
Easy upsell to people wanting to feel important by getting a "Pro" machines (or for actual people that need it).
Not really. Preferences seem to peak at 13" and 15".
![]()
Speaking of incoherent... ahem.
And no, people don't care about round numbers for Mac screen dimensions, just as people don't care that the 4.7" and 5.5" iPhone screen sizes are not round numbers.
But not the larger group of customers who want a smaller screen!
I agree with everything you said except the conclusion. 12", 13", and 15" can all coexist because the 12" and 13" MacBooks are different classes of machines. The 12" Retina MacBook uses a low-voltage CPU while the 13" MacBrook Pro uses a high-voltage CPU that's intended for more intensive tasks. Assuming the redesigned MacBook Pros are still targeted at "professionals", I don't see this changing.Perhaps these are 3227 college students that prefer small computers? Don't just throw polls at me, give me context at least. What year was this conducted, who was the group of people polled, what do they use their computers for? People don't know how to use statistics these days, yet they still use them to claim a point, like you just did.
It was never about round numbers, or even numbers...I don't know why you're inferring that.
It was about this:
13 to 15 = 2" difference (quite substantial)
12 to 13 = 1" difference (not substantial) - who wants to pay for a 1" difference!
Now lets look at a competitor
Dell XPS 13 to XPS 15 = 2" difference
How does 12 fit in the Mac lineup, if they continue to use 13 and 15?
They'll be available to buy day of release I believe going off how it's happened in the past, the only waits will come with the customer spec upgrade versions and obviously if the demand is very high given its been years since we've seen a truly meaningful updateIf you think about it this way October makes perfect sense. If they release in October and ramp up production they can have them on the shelves for Christmas presents. It would be the perfect time to release them for Christmas!
Damn, we went full-circle with the 12/14/16 vs. 12/13/15 debate again. I can feel the nostalgia kicking in.
My thoughts:
12" Macbook (price drop now, 15w Kaby Lake in March)
13" Macbook Air (25w Kaby Lake, no OLED)
13" Macbook Pro (Skylake Iris + ARM SOC for OLED)
15" Macbook Pro (Skylake Iris Pro + ARM SOC for OLED)
Just checked, they're all available in my areaJust checked online with one of UK's biggest electronic retailers (Currys) and they have a few Macs unavailable for delivery.
11" Air, 256GB
13" MBP, 256GB
13" MBP, 512GB
12" MB 256GB Rose gold
Interestingly all of the above are listed as 'unavailable for delivery' but do have instore pickup available at some locations. I live in a corner of the UK and none of my local stores have them.
Also the 12" MB 512GB Rose Gold is listed 'Out of stock' rather than just 'unavailable'.
Just checked, they're all available in my area
I've been thinking that this is what it'll be for a while now.
Perhaps these are 3227 college students that prefer small computers? Don't just throw polls at me, give me context at least. What year was this conducted, who was the group of people polled, what do they use their computers for? People don't know how to use statistics these days, yet they still use them to claim a point, like you just did.
It was never about round numbers, or even numbers...I don't know why you're inferring that.
It was about this:
13 to 15 = 2" difference (quite substantial)
12 to 13 = 1" difference (not substantial) - who wants to pay for a 1" difference!
Now lets look at a competitor
Dell XPS 13 to XPS 15 = 2" difference
12 to 14 maintains that 2" difference that we've become accustomed to. Likewise 14 to 16. Which makes more sense. It will make more sense for their laptop lineup to have consistent sizes. Not random sizes thrown in there - not many people know why the MacBook 12 is really 12. Now they can continue with a Pro lineup of 13 and 15, and keep another MacBook lineup of 12 and 14, go ahead do that and confuse customers even more, the total opposite of what Steve intended, and exactly what doomed Apple under Sculley.
So, after many failed Windows machines(more so dell and lenovos) I have finally decided to switch to a Macbook pro. Coincidentally my recent device failed a week back and I have been looking for a replacement. These recent rumors going around about a refreshed line of MacBooks have got my attention. Having decided on a MBP, and given that the new models would launch this month, I would like to know how long does it usually take for them to hit stores. /Basically, I am without a laptop until then. Or, would any of you for any reason suggest going with current line of MBP
Could be true..... and sort of makes sense. Works for me too on a personal / professional level.
I hadn't thought about it too much like this, but works into my theory [which everyone has ignored so far] that the chassis leak was a 15" with reduced footprint.
I am getting a bit more excited again now. No doubt this will wain over the next day or so unless some new leaks come out.
[doublepost=1475794835][/doublepost]
I would pay for that additional inch
Seriously though I had the 12" and the screen was too small for my use, but the 13" fine for short periods [several hours] which is my use of a laptop. Most of the time I need a big 27"er.
I agree with everything you said except the conclusion. 12", 13", and 15" can all coexist because the 12" and 13" MacBooks are different classes of machines. The 12" Retina MacBook uses a low-voltage CPU while the 13" MacBrook Pro uses a high-voltage CPU that's intended for more intensive tasks. Assuming the redesigned MacBook Pros are still targeted at "professionals", I don't see this changing.