Guys, GTX 950M and GTX 960M have THE SAME GM107 core inside them. How can one be crap, and second brilliant?
If you compare GDDR5 version of GTX960M to DDR3 version of 950M, then yes, 950M will look like crap.960M benchmarks >>>>>> 950M in games (FPS)
Very interesting indeed. Looks rather thin to be a MBP though...Perhaps a 14 inch Macbook?
From the article:
![]()
From what I've been reading across multiple threads, the general consensus is that
1. a january announcement is unlikely: not impossible, but unlikely.
2. a processor upgraded mbp could come as early as feb or march
3. a total resdesign may have us waiting until june wwdc.
Is this a fair summary?
Really could be a 14" MB
It seems to thin to be a MBP but the screen is so big.
And the keyboard goes from edge to edge
A bigger size with a larger keyboard? That probably wouldn't be comfortable...Really could be a 14" MB
It seems to thin to be a MBP but the screen is so big.
And the keyboard goes from edge to edge
so why Apple ever put Nvidia cards in the past? they don't care about openGL but they have macs with 650M or 750M etcIt would be 950M if they go back to Nvidia. They have a TDP limit that the 960M exceeds. Its physics guys.
I would expect them to stay with AMD frankly though. Apple puts dGPU's in its laptops for professional apps, which means OpenCL. They really do not care about gaming.
From what I've been reading across multiple threads, the general consensus is that
1. a january announcement is unlikely: not impossible, but unlikely.
2. a processor upgraded mbp could come as early as feb or march
3. a total resdesign may have us waiting until june wwdc.
Is this a fair summary?
No this is not a fair summary. Those voicing a WWDC release are a clear minority. Most of us believe Jan-March is a probable timeframe.From what I've been reading across multiple threads, the general consensus is that
1. a january announcement is unlikely: not impossible, but unlikely.
2. a processor upgraded mbp could come as early as feb or march
3. a total resdesign may have us waiting until june wwdc.
Is this a fair summary?
No this is not a fair summary. Those voicing a WWDC release are a clear minority. Most of us believe Jan-March is a probable timeframe.
Could we see very news-less and without much fanfare upgrade to Skylakes in January/February ( much like happened when Broadwell came in, not that much news about it) before total resdesign June/July?
Surely that's a decent way for Apple to maximize profits.
Could we see very news-less and without much fanfare upgrade to Skylakes in January/February ( much like happened when Broadwell came in, not that much news about it) before total resdesign June/July?
Surely that's a decent way for Apple to maximize profits.
What exactly happened in the past when they decided to do a new design?I highly doubt that would happen at this point. Maybe silent refresh early in the year and redesign in the fall, but I doubt that too. Pretty positive that they'll announce a refresh next time they talk about the MBP.
Either minor processor update early in the year, redesign late in the year or just redesign somewhere in the year and maybe a minor processor update later.What exactly happened in the past when they decided to do a new design?
Well, usually they will had many rumors before any redesign happened in the past?Either minor processor update early in the year, redesign late in the year or just redesign somewhere in the year and maybe a minor processor update later.
The timing this time suggests the latter. It would be a waste of time to upgrade to Broadwell, and there aren't going to be any better Skylake chips later in the year. There will probably just be a redesigned (hopefully) Macbook Pro in the first half of the year, and it will receive a minor refresh early next year.
Well time it's changing, I think Apple lost some of its visionary comparing the Jobs era. Their competitors start to knowing about what they're doing and Apple seems can't find a new way even it's still ahead than everyone body else.I think many predicted a retina display for the 15 MBA and that didn't pan out.
What's unfortunate about apple's success then is that they can be very conservative with their upgrades and yet still make money hand over fist.
I have a '15 MBA and it's a fantastic computer. However, when I'm using it as a portable, it's to my slight chagrin that the MBA is nearly ubiguitous.This doesn't make the MBA any less fantastic; but there's no cache associated with it any longer.
Here's hoping for a homerun upgrade for the '16 MBP.