So now that we are expecting them this month, the real question remains:
Which one of y'all is buying me one?
Which one of y'all is buying me one?
I'm buy you one if someone buys me one. We can start a pay it forward trainSo now that we are expecting them this month, the real question remains:
Which one of y'all is buying me one?
I'm not comparing the two machines, i'm just saying the level of interest from the media and the public in general is just nowhere near the same. The entire Mac line is 7% (on a good day!) of the PC market. To put things in perspective in Q1 2016 they shipped 4.4 million Macs and 51 million iPhones.During that quarter the iPhone SE got its own keynote and the update to the MacBook didn't even warrant a mention.
Honestly I don't really see why people care as long as they release the things. I can live without Phil Schiller drivel to be honest !
MacBook Pros are confirmed to be announced next week. I work at an authorized campus store and we got an email notifying us of an information and training call with the topic of "Macs" that is dated for October 28th. Given this information, new Macs are guaranteed to be announced if not released that same week.
I saw Windows NT 4 Workstation in businesses of all sizes, especially banks for years. Not to mention, NT superseded OS/2 on millions of ATMs world wide. You really need to do more research about Windows. As far back NT 3.5 it was just as popular as Windows 3x in corporate environments because of pre-emptive multi-tasking, protected memory and 32 bit computing. Some of which mainstream Mac users didn't start getting until Mac OS 10.0. Considering, Mac OS X didn't start going full mainstream until 10.3 or 10.4, it was pretty much catch up.
The point was not that NT was not successful on other architectures, it was the point you made about Windows being only mainstream on one processor architecture its entire life. Windows NT and Windows 9x might not have been the same architecturally, but they shared the same WIN32 API's. That why concurrently, products in the 90s and early 2000's worked on both.
I'm going to be a gentleman and go last on this trainI'm buy you one if someone buys me one. We can start a pay it forward train
Yes.Wait, let me get this straight: Today's mid-2015 15" rMBP has the same Haswell architecture as my late-2013 15" rMBP?
A .2 GHz bump over three years.Yes.
Absolutely.
Now you see why we rage.
I don't care how apple announces these as long as I have one ordered by the end of the month... I'll already be saving hours not having to go on this site every 12 minutes .
I must say I despise the fact that they're getting rid of MagSafe if that's true. MagSafe and 3 USB-C would be A-OK with me.
Too true. Events are always cool but at this point I'd gladly take a press conference just for the wait to be over. I don't even want to think about how much time I've spent on this thread since WWDC.
Really, removing MagSafe would be a catastrophe. It's one of Macbook's best featuresI must say I despise the fact that they're getting rid of MagSafe if that's true. MagSafe and 3 USB-C would be A-OK with me.
The justification is that you no longer need to have it plugged in all the time anymore. While I don't agree with this 100%, the fact that it standardizes the adapter protocol is worth the sacrifice of MagSafe. No more $80 chargers, no more proprietary cables.Really, removing MagSafe would be a catastrophe. It's one of Macbook's best features![]()
The rumors seem to support a price increase across the board.
Macbook - $1299
Macbook Air 13"- $1499
Macbook Pro 13"- $1699
Macbook Pro 15" $2299
Very possible, and honestly extremely likely if the event is to be on the 27th.Is it possible that invites are sent out tomorrow?
Hah! $1700USD for a base 13" Pro. Jokes. That should be impossib--yuck, i hope not. there is no reason a 13" air should cost 1500, even if it has kaby lake (weak processor of it, might i add) and a retina display.