Only if it's soldered onto a desk and taking out the core essence of what makes a laptop a laptop, portability. Imagine taking out a 17" laptop, whose total empirical volume increase is greater than the increase from 13" to 15", anywhere where portability is remotely necessary. -shudders-
Y u people so naive. Why do yall get fooled so easily? No wonder Serban trolled all you folk! I don't blame him.
Person thinks I'm Mark Gurman???????????
Please tell me this is a joke.
Maybe you can walk into Bloomberg with a badge that says "Germayne" and a paper bag on your head.
This is an authentic print screen lol.
12" MacBook and 13", 15" and 17" MacBook Pros would be the perfect lineup
he works at intel. get some info about kabylake
just curious but how was your experience with the 12in MacBook? did you notice that it was slow at all? I know the new MacBook Pro is coming out and will have a much more powerful processor but could the 12in still work for you?
That's what I was wondering: how many of the 15" folks would be getting a 17" if it were offered? Let's say, with 32 GB of RAM and a 4K screen?
I probably wouldn't, as enticing as it sounds, because it would cross the line into not being portable enough. 15" is a perfect balance between desktop replacement and portability.
I really hate the way Apple have set up the models/prices. Hopefully it's a little different this time around, but just looking at the current specs/price points for example...
I'd rather a 15 inch, but my only two options for 15 inch is 256GB (not enough) or 512GB (doable, but $3,799 - I have $4,000 set aside but I'd rather not spend all of it if it can be avoided lol). So if I accept that I'll need to get a 13 inch, the only 512GB option I have is $2,799, but I'm sacrificing the specs of the 15 (i7 down to i5, 16GB down to 8GB). So it's either spend $1,000 more or have worse specs OR just not have enough space for anything.
I guess I could go the 256GB 15 inch ($3,099) and then just change the storage to 512GB (+$480, totalling $3,579 instead of $3,799). But that also then delays the delivery time. First world problems.
Here's hoping they have a better selection this time around lol. Anyway, thinking out loud over.
Portability is relative to each case scenario, I agree on your point there. However look at the scope it falls into. It's like saying "Physical beauty is relative". Sure, yeah, a model on a front page (male OR female) might look like a "9" to some, 8.5 to others, 9.5 to some, but you'll find nobody to say that the wholly agreed on model is a 2 out of 10. Everything has a scope that it comfortably and realistically falls inside of. For a 17" laptop, the scope of pure portability will always be less than that of a 13". Next, will you argue that taking a 21.5" laptop to school and an airplane is any remotely connected to the word "portable" at all? What about a 23"? Look at the scope. Realistically a 17" laptop from Apple will never, RELATIVELY, be as portable as a 12" or 13" laptop from Apple.The 15" already technically has that problem - My 15" rMBP already has trouble in certain situations, especially airplanes and some college chair-desk combos in classrooms. A person who buys a larger laptop understands this. Not every place where "portability is remotely necessary" is the size of an Airplane tray table.
Portability is relative - For the performance the 17" Razer Blade offers, I consider it quite portable. I can take a laptop with the performance of desktop GTX 1080 to school, library, class, or lab. Saying a 17" takes away the essence of a laptop is about as idiotic as saying 15" takes away the essence as well and that the 13" is the only 'true' portable machine, when I see some students carrying PC laptops 2-3 times as thick and heavy.
Does anyone know if Apple historically stocks popular BTO configurations (as I imagine this would be) in any of their retail stores? I'm talking about stores in big markets like NYC. Think there's any chance of walking into an Apple Store on launch day and picking up a maxed out MBP in the spot?
12" MacBook and 13", 15" and 17" MacBook Pros would be the perfect lineup
I was the One that foud "DarknetGuy", leaks, and i still taking loads of salt. whatever the Magic Toolbar, seems to me either a random match or maybe some how this guy its connected with some one at apple just, he failed miserably on mos of the dates about the new mac releases (august the last one).I just want to bring up this post. This is the first mention of a Magic Toolbar here on this thread. The comment was posted on June 2 so it was after Kou's OLED bar rumor. This DarkerGuy or DarkNetGuy or whatever he's called seemed to be a joke at first but he got the name of the touch bar right. Should we expect $100 cheaper base models?
What would you guys rather have? 13 and 15 inch form factor with 14 and 16 inch screens
or
12 and 14 inch form factor with 13 and 15 inch screens
That's what I was wondering: how many of the 15" folks would be getting a 17" if it were offered? Let's say, with 32 GB of RAM and a 4K screen?
I probably wouldn't, as enticing as it sounds, because it would cross the line into not being portable enough. 15" is a perfect balance between desktop replacement and portability.
Realistically, a Macbook Pro will never, RELATIVELY, be as portable as a Macbook Air. That doesn't mean people all prefer the Air over the Pro. It's a matter of tradeoffs, and there are quite a few people who would love the power of a 17" model, and still find it portable enough.Portability is relative to each case scenario, I agree on your point there. However look at the scope it falls into. It's like saying "Physical beauty is relative". Sure, yeah, a model on a front page (male OR female) might look like a "9" to some, 8.5 to others, 9.5 to some, but you'll find nobody to say that the wholly agreed on model is a 2 out of 10. Everything has a scope that it comfortably and realistically falls inside of. For a 17" laptop, the scope of pure portability will always be less than that of a 13". Next, will you argue that taking a 21.5" laptop to school and an airplane is any remotely connected to the word "portable" at all? What about a 23"? Look at the scope. Realistically a 17" laptop from Apple will never, RELATIVELY, be as portable as a 12" or 13" laptop from Apple.
The problem I heard is that you cant really turn the gpu on or off manually. So if theres a program like Chrome or some other app turns on the dgpu for some reason then its just unnecessary fan noise and heat. My friend has this issue with Ableton Live and it pisses him offI would get a 17" without a second thought. And it would be easier to make it more powerful, I would max that sucker out.
I don't know why all the hate on dGPUs. I have my late 2008 which was the first to have it and have had zero issues. I hardly ever used it for the first few years then I turned that puppy on and really speed my laptop up.
confused:
I just priced this 15" with applecare for 3350 and it has already 1TB. With 512GB it would be 500 less. How do you get to these high prices?
Hardware
- 2.5GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.7GHz
- 16GB 1600MHz DDR3L SDRAM
- 1TB PCIe-based Flash Storage
- Intel Iris Pro Graphics + AMD Radeon R9 M370X with 2GB GDDR5 memory
- Force Touch trackpad
- Backlit Keyboard (English) & User's Guide
- Accessory Kit