Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pretty sure Gurman has had everything well in advance of the last couple of events. He even had one of the images of the Macbook from the Apple website in January last year.
 
Hey Guys!
Could somebody tell me, which are the CPUs, that could be (rumourwise) in the new 13" rmbp?
 
With the way Apple is trending, those days are coming to an end my friend.

Hmmm I'm worried about the road Apple is going down as well but as of now, Mac OS, for me, ist still lightyears ahead of Windows 10, even though it did some nice catching up.

I personally see myself - a few years down the road - where I have a hardcore workstation laptop running neither Windows nor Mac OS X but some Linux distribution like https://elementary.io - I tested it for a while and besides the lack of software I'm used to in a professional environment (i.e. creative suite) it worked really nice. For a "common casual user" I really see no need in using either Mac OS or Windows as of TODAY. You can do EVERYTHING on that (and similar like mint and ubuntu) Linux distros you would do on any other computer, with the only difference that everything is free...

The moment there's Adobe Creative Suite on Linux, I'm probably gone.

:D
 
With the way Apple is trending, those days are coming to an end my friend.

I'm not too sure though, my friend uses a Dell XPS 15 and I've been called over far too many times to fix an issue here and issue there. Drivers failing, missing drivers, scaling issues even with magnification, distorted audio because of driver + build quality, flaky touchscreen. the list goes on.

had to do multiple fresh installs just to get rid of the bloatware, deal with windows 10 upgrade issues, and find the right drivers (which arent always the ones listed on dells page)

Given that I'm also looking to get a 15 inch laptop in the near future, made me firmly choose Apple despite the better internals on the dell...
[doublepost=1458401626][/doublepost]
The moment there's Adobe Creative Suite on Linux, I'm probably gone.

given that I'm quite curious about linux my self, do you think that would happen anytime in the near future?
And how plausible do you think it would be to use, let's say something as underpowered as a chromebook, but use paperspace.io to use heavier software?
 
Hmmm I'm worried about the road Apple is going down as well but as of now, Mac OS, for me, ist still lightyears ahead of Windows 10, even though it did some nice catching up.

I personally see myself - a few years down the road - where I have a hardcore workstation laptop running neither Windows nor Mac OS X but some Linux distribution like https://elementary.io - I tested it for a while and besides the lack of software I'm used to in a professional environment (i.e. creative suite) it worked really nice. For a "common casual user" I really see no need in using either Mac OS or Windows as of TODAY. You can do EVERYTHING on that (and similar like mint and ubuntu) Linux distros you would do on any other computer, with the only difference that everything is free...

The moment there's Adobe Creative Suite on Linux, I'm probably gone.

:D

Would you mind to share your personal experience? Things that you have felt or use in OS X that makes you think it's "still lightyears ahead of Windows 10"? I ask as someone who is going to meet OS X for the first time (virtual box os x roms don't count), I'm just curious.
 
Just ordered XPS 15 4k. And, goodbye guys, have fun and be patient.

I understand switching because being fed up with Apple, but I'd at least wait for the Keynote on Monday.

The main reason I haven't pulled the trigger on something else is because I know Im going to be pissed and have buyer's remorse when that shiny new rMBP releases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dydegu
Actully
Would you mind to share your personal experience? Things that you have felt or use in OS X that makes you think it's "still lightyears ahead of Windows 10"? I ask as someone who is going to meet OS X for the first time (virtual box os x roms don't count), I'm just curious.

Actully try to share r expirence in detalis cause me 2 its gonna be my first mac anyway new one the 2016 depends on when i go home then i will buy cause i am stuck on a ship , to be hones i am using HP pavillon 6 or something like this in 2011 and since i bought it its like hell on earth lol but still working anyway , and also since instarted using Iphones and ipads and got intouch with the simplicity and protection of apple i have decided to buy the mac but been like 25 years may b on windows so that transition wont be easy ... But i need more motivation towards apple
 
Would you mind to share your personal experience? Things that you have felt or use in OS X that makes you think it's "still lightyears ahead of Windows 10"? I ask as someone who is going to meet OS X for the first time (virtual box os x roms don't count), I'm just curious.
May I chime in and tell you why I prefer OS X? As I said a few pages back, the reason why I love OS X is the small things. Here are just a few of them:
  1. In Windows, setting default apps will cause icons on the desktop and in the taskbar to flash for some reason. (Sometimes they flash randomly.) This never happens in OS X.
  2. Installing apps and uninstalling apps are so much simpler in OS X. I don't have to worry about application files being scattered throughout the entire file system. Managing what apps appear in the Start menu in Windows is a chore.
  3. I love how you can interact with the content in an inactive window using the mouse without bringing the window to the front while pressing the Command key. This is a huge time-saver. I don't think this is possible in Windows.
  4. The ability to hide all windows of an app in OS X is handy.
  5. In OS X, clicking Close or Minimize in an inactive window doesn't bring it to the front first.
  6. OS X looks more refined than Windows.
  7. Animations feel more natural in OS X.
  8. I love OS X’s text antialiasing.
  9. You can search for menu items in the Help menu.
 
May I chime in and tell you why I prefer OS X? As I said a few pages back, the reason why I love OS X is the small things. Here are just a few of them:
  1. In Windows, setting default apps will cause icons on the desktop and in the taskbar to flash for some reason. (Sometimes they flash randomly.) This never happens in OS X.
  2. Installing apps and uninstalling apps are so much simpler in OS X. I don't have to worry about application files being scattered throughout the entire file system. Managing what apps appear in the Start menu in Windows is a chore.
  3. I love how you can interact with the content in an inactive window using the mouse without bringing the window to the front while pressing the Command key. This is a huge time-saver. I don't think this is possible in Windows.
  4. The ability to hide all windows of an app in OS X is handy.
  5. In OS X, clicking Close or Minimize in an inactive window doesn't bring it to the front first.
  6. OS X looks more refined than Windows.
  7. Animations feel more natural in OS X.
  8. I love OS X’s text antialiasing.

I prefer OS X because I actually need it to code.........
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirdanMR
Hmmm I'm worried about the road Apple is going down as well but as of now, Mac OS, for me, ist still lightyears ahead of Windows 10, even though it did some nice catching up.

I personally see myself - a few years down the road - where I have a hardcore workstation laptop running neither Windows nor Mac OS X but some Linux distribution like https://elementary.io - I tested it for a while and besides the lack of software I'm used to in a professional environment (i.e. creative suite) it worked really nice. For a "common casual user" I really see no need in using either Mac OS or Windows as of TODAY. You can do EVERYTHING on that (and similar like mint and ubuntu) Linux distros you would do on any other computer, with the only difference that everything is free...

The moment there's Adobe Creative Suite on Linux, I'm probably gone.

:D

I think I'll try installing a linux distribution (I'm looking into manjaro) once I get the machine. I've heard that dell's laptop has nice compatibility with linux…They even released a XPS 13 with built-in ubuntu system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: You are the One
Would you mind to share your personal experience? Things that you have felt or use in OS X that makes you think it's "still lightyears ahead of Windows 10"? I ask as someone who is going to meet OS X for the first time (virtual box os x roms don't count), I'm just curious.

With regards to OS X vs Windows I'm going to repeat what I wrote on a thread regarding just that:


In the office I work on Windows 7 and for computer games at home I mostly use Windows 10, no complaints, stable as mountains. But...
But it's not a nice place to be. It feels cold and clinical, like a machine.
Using Windows feels like browsing a file cabinet.

(Something about Ununtu removed for the sake of simplicity)

Mac OS, OSX, this is where I want to be.
Like a soft bathrobe or a warm pair of slippers that somehow come with a butler (Automator).
Everything feels connected in OSX. Hard to explain.
It looks nice and unobtrusive, not distracting. Using it feels intuitive (a relative term, I guess).
I never get that "HNNGH! WHAT? WHAT!? JUST DO AS I ****ING TELL YOU AND DON'T ASK ANY ****ING QUESTIONS!" feeling with OSX that I frequently get with Windows.
And to hell with Windows Update, Java updates, Anti Virus updates...Just go away!
I just want to enjoy some peace and quiet with my personal (the operative word here) computer, not fiddle with all the maintenance **** Windows requires to go to my liking.

Edited slightly for relevance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirdanMR
So theoretically, sure if you have a dGPU on machine you get an extra 2GB of VRAM dedicated to the GPU, where as an iGPU has to share with the CPU RAM. But when you have 16GB of RAM, Ram limitations become no longer an issue. You can still have the CPU using 10GB and the GPU using 6GB. Or the CPU using 12GB and the GPU using 4GB. This is why dedicated VRAM does not give major performance gains.

Now in practice, we see from benchmarks that iGPU systems using only 45W of power perform on par with systems that have a 45W CPU and 50W GPU while using less than half the power. And saving money by not having to pay for 2 high end performance chips. And saving physical space.

This is why Apple is moving away from dGPUs.


Now don't get me wrong. I am an avid gamer and don't get me wrong I will still love to buy GTX Titans and stick them in my desktop computer. And I would even buy a 17" thick gaming laptop with a 145 Watt 980M that would have to be connected to a power source often. So of course there are some dGPUs that are going to still outperform iris 580, but that's because they are in another category, far higher price point, and far higher power consumption. If Intel wanted too...(I don't think they do) they could make an extreme end expensive 100 watt + mobile CPU with an even more powerful iGPU that could compete with things like 980M.

That's a very interesting and very insightful explanation :). If the dGPU doesn't give any major performance benefits, then why do we still have them if the iGPU is more than capable of delivering 60fps-120fps @ 2160p at a much cooler temperature? If Intel can beat the Titan X and/or the Quadro M6000 and put that in the iGPU-equipped MBP, then I'll be waiting in the Apple line in the rain.

I'm an avid video editor and compositor who uses a gaming desktop to handle my post-production needs and I have the last generation non-retina 2012 MBP15 w/ the 1GB Nvidia dGPU which I love even though its hardware is old but I can still edit/composite and it's a real workhorse.

...I'm hoping Apple puts a 32GB DDR4 RAM chip in their rMBPs and a 16GB DDR4 RAM chip in the MBAs/MBs, but that's a separate issue...
 
Jeez....Honestly, who here bought their first Mac based upon its performance?

Not many of you I bet. Rather, it was due to usability, integration, aesthetic and productivity.

The way some carry on and even shift to Windows systems because the cpu and gpu generation is not has high as the competition, even though the MacBook Pro is a very excellent performing system that is a joy to use....well, maybe they have lost sight of the picture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jef82
It should be able to, and if not this generation than it will next generation.

Intel has been closing the performance gap between iGPUs and dGPUs dramatically over the last 5 years. And now they have closed the gap. Iris 580 is faster than the dGPU in the 15" MBP. And Iris 580 is faster than any dGPU available today that fits Apple's thermal requirements for the MacBook Pro. Sure maybe this summer pascal and Polaris will come out with faster chips, but then those will have to compete with kaby lake iGPUs eventually. Now that intel has closed the gap, now going forward iGPUs will be come the faster than dGPUs.

Wow, it seems that iGPUs are making a comeback. I used to remember years ago they were a hassle to deal with and every tech geek said to me "buy a dGPU", now you can run anything including Avid/Adobe without a hiccup.

I'm looking forward to see the Iris 580s in action...
 
  • Like
Reactions: nicovh
I think they're referring their new campus

Yep, the headline of their event is about their unfinished campus.

'Milanese loop' ... 'Leather loop' .. they're using the word loop for bands... this event will talk about watch bands, no doubt about it.
[doublepost=1458411841][/doublepost]I've pretty much stopped caring, I have the 2012 original rMBP which up until recently has been fine... I've had a career change, using it for work more often, much more resources so the 8GB ram isn't enough.Apart from that this 2012 rMBP is the fastest computer i've ever used and is still as fast as the day I purchased it.

The only reason I haven't purchased is because it's so close i might as well wait to see if they're coming. If there is no announcement on Monday i'll be ordering the current model.

With little to no rumours, leaks or evidence i'll say we're almost at zero chance of this happening, if it does it will be a Skylake speed bump, which lets be honest, most of us won't even notice on day to day usage.

For everyone else holding out, don't feel too bad on Monday, the latest rMBPs will be very capable machines considering my 2012 model is still a beast.
 
Jeez....Honestly, who here bought their first Mac based upon its performance?

Not many of you I bet. Rather, it was due to usability, integration, aesthetic and productivity.

If I may chime in, I bought a Mac because Final Cut Studio was the standard in the entertainment industry and it was only available on a Mac even though the prototype was made for a PC as well, but that's no longer the case since studios and small marketing agencies use either Avid Media Composer and/or Adobe Premiere Pro.

Some studios used Avid before FCS, then changed to FCP7, then back to Avid because FCPX haunted every editor in 2011.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jj237
So can anyone tell me if there is some historical precedent for macbook pros selling out on launch? Ideally I would want to wait a few weeks for some first impressions to come in before placing an order, but if there is a likelihood of there being a shortage then I would order early.
 
The capacity of dedicated VRAM may not, but the speed and the aggregate memory I/O width would do so. Iris Pro is just relying on the system memory bandwidth and the on-package 128MB cache, both of which are shared with the rest of the system.
;)

True

Not saying it is impossible (e.g. AMD might bring HBM to its APU product stack), but this claim is a bit over-generalised. Integrated graphics can wipe a lot of entry level cards we used to have, but dGPU can still have an edge by having a dedicated, high-speed pool of memory.

P.S. I am interested in an Skylake rMBP with Iris Pro though. ;)

Right, like I said there will still be higher end dGPUs available that will surpass intel's offerings. What I am saying is on a price to performance ratio, and on a power consumption to performance ratio, intel has closed the gab, and will now beat systems with dGPUs.

If intel wanted to compete with higher end dGPUs like the 145W 980M, they could make a CPU with an iGPU that also has a dedicated high-speed pool of memory.



Dumb q -
Oculus Rift & HTC Vive resolution is 2160x1200 @90fps.

iPhone 6s Plus pixel count is 1920x1080.
But isn't the rendered pixels 2208x1242?

Is the iPhone 6 Plus already doing the graphical work prior to downsizing to 1080x60Hz?

http://www.paintcodeapp.com/news/iphone-6-screens-demystified

Yes they'd need to increase fps by 50% - which would be what, 3 years worth of improvements at the current rate?

iPhones can already output to 4k. (3840x2160)

I wouldn't be surprised if the iPhone 7 will be able to output 2160x1200@90fps

But to play graphically intense VR games at the level of the rift and vive, iPhone probably won't even be able to make 30fps at 1080p

I tested an Iris 540 (nowhere near 580, I know), on the Surface Pro 4, and let me tell you, it was bad. You are putting too much hope into that iGPU. But if you want a $2500 machine with iGPU, go right ahead :D

So you had the highest end model of the surface pro 4? I did too. And guess what you can't fit a dGPU in that size of tablet. And the performance of the Iris 540 is incredible, when you consider its thermal and power consumption limitations.

And I am not putting too much hope in that iGPU. I have tested several to all GPUs coming out over the last 4-5 years from AMD, Nvidia, and Intel. And it is clear that the iGPU model is going to beat the dGPU model, in most use cases. In the case of a notebook like 13" and 15" MBP the iGPU model wins.

So if I could buy a $2500 computer with a dGPU or $2000 computer with an iGPU, and the iGPU performs better and with better batterylife and costs less. Yes I am going to go right ahead and get that one, and recommend it to all my friends.
 
@Simplicated and @Ovedius thanks for your answers guys!

Nothing big I see, but well the icons is a good one! Probably one of the most annoying things of windows since ever! :D

I read somewhere that you should not have files on desktop in Mac because it could slow down speed is it true?
 
Jeez....Honestly, who here bought their first Mac based upon its performance?

Not many of you I bet. Rather, it was due to usability, integration, aesthetic and productivity.

The way some carry on and even shift to Windows systems because the cpu and gpu generation is not has high as the competition, even though the MacBook Pro is a very excellent performing system that is a joy to use....well, maybe they have lost sight of the picture.

I bought my first mac because of performance. It had better cpu and GPU specs at a lower price than any pc laptop available on the market.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.