Pretty sure Gurman has had everything well in advance of the last couple of events. He even had one of the images of the Macbook from the Apple website in January last year.
Just ordered XPS 15 4k. And, goodbye guys, have fun and be patient.
But the Problem ist: Dell installs Windows on this beautiful piece of Hardware... A real Mac user can't switch to Windows... ;-)
With the way Apple is trending, those days are coming to an end my friend.
With the way Apple is trending, those days are coming to an end my friend.
The moment there's Adobe Creative Suite on Linux, I'm probably gone.
Hmmm I'm worried about the road Apple is going down as well but as of now, Mac OS, for me, ist still lightyears ahead of Windows 10, even though it did some nice catching up.
I personally see myself - a few years down the road - where I have a hardcore workstation laptop running neither Windows nor Mac OS X but some Linux distribution like https://elementary.io - I tested it for a while and besides the lack of software I'm used to in a professional environment (i.e. creative suite) it worked really nice. For a "common casual user" I really see no need in using either Mac OS or Windows as of TODAY. You can do EVERYTHING on that (and similar like mint and ubuntu) Linux distros you would do on any other computer, with the only difference that everything is free...
The moment there's Adobe Creative Suite on Linux, I'm probably gone.
![]()
Just ordered XPS 15 4k. And, goodbye guys, have fun and be patient.
Would you mind to share your personal experience? Things that you have felt or use in OS X that makes you think it's "still lightyears ahead of Windows 10"? I ask as someone who is going to meet OS X for the first time (virtual box os x roms don't count), I'm just curious.
May I chime in and tell you why I prefer OS X? As I said a few pages back, the reason why I love OS X is the small things. Here are just a few of them:Would you mind to share your personal experience? Things that you have felt or use in OS X that makes you think it's "still lightyears ahead of Windows 10"? I ask as someone who is going to meet OS X for the first time (virtual box os x roms don't count), I'm just curious.
May I chime in and tell you why I prefer OS X? As I said a few pages back, the reason why I love OS X is the small things. Here are just a few of them:
- In Windows, setting default apps will cause icons on the desktop and in the taskbar to flash for some reason. (Sometimes they flash randomly.) This never happens in OS X.
- Installing apps and uninstalling apps are so much simpler in OS X. I don't have to worry about application files being scattered throughout the entire file system. Managing what apps appear in the Start menu in Windows is a chore.
- I love how you can interact with the content in an inactive window using the mouse without bringing the window to the front while pressing the Command key. This is a huge time-saver. I don't think this is possible in Windows.
- The ability to hide all windows of an app in OS X is handy.
- In OS X, clicking Close or Minimize in an inactive window doesn't bring it to the front first.
- OS X looks more refined than Windows.
- Animations feel more natural in OS X.
- I love OS X’s text antialiasing.
Hmmm I'm worried about the road Apple is going down as well but as of now, Mac OS, for me, ist still lightyears ahead of Windows 10, even though it did some nice catching up.
I personally see myself - a few years down the road - where I have a hardcore workstation laptop running neither Windows nor Mac OS X but some Linux distribution like https://elementary.io - I tested it for a while and besides the lack of software I'm used to in a professional environment (i.e. creative suite) it worked really nice. For a "common casual user" I really see no need in using either Mac OS or Windows as of TODAY. You can do EVERYTHING on that (and similar like mint and ubuntu) Linux distros you would do on any other computer, with the only difference that everything is free...
The moment there's Adobe Creative Suite on Linux, I'm probably gone.
![]()
Hey Guys!
Could somebody tell me, which are the CPUs, that could be (rumourwise) in the new 13" rmbp?
Would you mind to share your personal experience? Things that you have felt or use in OS X that makes you think it's "still lightyears ahead of Windows 10"? I ask as someone who is going to meet OS X for the first time (virtual box os x roms don't count), I'm just curious.
With regards to OS X vs Windows I'm going to repeat what I wrote on a thread regarding just that:
In the office I work on Windows 7 and for computer games at home I mostly use Windows 10, no complaints, stable as mountains. But...
But it's not a nice place to be. It feels cold and clinical, like a machine.
Using Windows feels like browsing a file cabinet.
(Something about Ununtu removed for the sake of simplicity)
Mac OS, OSX, this is where I want to be.
Like a soft bathrobe or a warm pair of slippers that somehow come with a butler (Automator).
Everything feels connected in OSX. Hard to explain.
It looks nice and unobtrusive, not distracting. Using it feels intuitive (a relative term, I guess).
I never get that "HNNGH! WHAT? WHAT!? JUST DO AS I ****ING TELL YOU AND DON'T ASK ANY ****ING QUESTIONS!" feeling with OSX that I frequently get with Windows.
And to hell with Windows Update, Java updates, Anti Virus updates...Just go away!
I just want to enjoy some peace and quiet with my personal (the operative word here) computer, not fiddle with all the maintenance **** Windows requires to go to my liking.
Edited slightly for relevance.
So theoretically, sure if you have a dGPU on machine you get an extra 2GB of VRAM dedicated to the GPU, where as an iGPU has to share with the CPU RAM. But when you have 16GB of RAM, Ram limitations become no longer an issue. You can still have the CPU using 10GB and the GPU using 6GB. Or the CPU using 12GB and the GPU using 4GB. This is why dedicated VRAM does not give major performance gains.
Now in practice, we see from benchmarks that iGPU systems using only 45W of power perform on par with systems that have a 45W CPU and 50W GPU while using less than half the power. And saving money by not having to pay for 2 high end performance chips. And saving physical space.
This is why Apple is moving away from dGPUs.
Now don't get me wrong. I am an avid gamer and don't get me wrong I will still love to buy GTX Titans and stick them in my desktop computer. And I would even buy a 17" thick gaming laptop with a 145 Watt 980M that would have to be connected to a power source often. So of course there are some dGPUs that are going to still outperform iris 580, but that's because they are in another category, far higher price point, and far higher power consumption. If Intel wanted too...(I don't think they do) they could make an extreme end expensive 100 watt + mobile CPU with an even more powerful iGPU that could compete with things like 980M.
It should be able to, and if not this generation than it will next generation.
Intel has been closing the performance gap between iGPUs and dGPUs dramatically over the last 5 years. And now they have closed the gap. Iris 580 is faster than the dGPU in the 15" MBP. And Iris 580 is faster than any dGPU available today that fits Apple's thermal requirements for the MacBook Pro. Sure maybe this summer pascal and Polaris will come out with faster chips, but then those will have to compete with kaby lake iGPUs eventually. Now that intel has closed the gap, now going forward iGPUs will be come the faster than dGPUs.
I think they're referring their new campus
Jeez....Honestly, who here bought their first Mac based upon its performance?
Not many of you I bet. Rather, it was due to usability, integration, aesthetic and productivity.
The capacity of dedicated VRAM may not, but the speed and the aggregate memory I/O width would do so. Iris Pro is just relying on the system memory bandwidth and the on-package 128MB cache, both of which are shared with the rest of the system.
![]()
Not saying it is impossible (e.g. AMD might bring HBM to its APU product stack), but this claim is a bit over-generalised. Integrated graphics can wipe a lot of entry level cards we used to have, but dGPU can still have an edge by having a dedicated, high-speed pool of memory.
P.S. I am interested in an Skylake rMBP with Iris Pro though.![]()
Dumb q -
Oculus Rift & HTC Vive resolution is 2160x1200 @90fps.
iPhone 6s Plus pixel count is 1920x1080.
But isn't the rendered pixels 2208x1242?
Is the iPhone 6 Plus already doing the graphical work prior to downsizing to 1080x60Hz?
http://www.paintcodeapp.com/news/iphone-6-screens-demystified
Yes they'd need to increase fps by 50% - which would be what, 3 years worth of improvements at the current rate?
I tested an Iris 540 (nowhere near 580, I know), on the Surface Pro 4, and let me tell you, it was bad. You are putting too much hope into that iGPU. But if you want a $2500 machine with iGPU, go right ahead![]()
Jeez....Honestly, who here bought their first Mac based upon its performance?
Not many of you I bet. Rather, it was due to usability, integration, aesthetic and productivity.
The way some carry on and even shift to Windows systems because the cpu and gpu generation is not has high as the competition, even though the MacBook Pro is a very excellent performing system that is a joy to use....well, maybe they have lost sight of the picture.