What part of that makes you thnk it's not a redesign? I doubt Apple would release a product, only to make it completely and utterly obsolete (and probably out of production) 3-4 months later. That's unthinkable to me.
The reddit post doesn't give any indication either of way of whether or not it's a redesign 🙂
Interesting post that showed up in this reddit thread the other day, responding to allegations of lack of leaks on the SL MBP..
"As someone who knows actual apple employees who tell me things they shouldn't, even the employees are surprised sometimes.
People I know on the Mac engineering team said the new skylake Macs were released from engineering weeks ago. Given the pattern they've witnessed with previous Mac releases, and the time it's taken them to go from engineering to manufacturing to announcement and release, they expected announcement yesterday. They were thoroughly surprised when that didn't happen.
But the exact timing on that stuff is above their pay grade, and they certainly don't notify employees about these kinds of decisions. It could have been a supply chain or manufacturing issue, or maybe they just didn't want to clog up the presentation with Macs and are holding it a month for that reason alone. Who knows; the engineers certainly don't.
Why do I mention this? Because 1) REAL leaks aren't just manufacturing or supply chain, and 2) even REAL leaks may not have all of the information and might be making some educated guesses (and occasionally be wrong)."
if that's the case, i don't it'd be a redesign. maybe a spec bump to skylake then a redesign in the fall?
In July 1976 the Apple I went on sale for $666.66 (aside: evil, much? hehe).
I hereby propose the theory that to celebrate 40 years of Apple computers (that's right, *computers*; indeed that product family which inspired and defined Apple for the majority of its corporate existence), Apple will announce on April 1st, 2016 (Apple's 40th anniversary since founding) an across-the-board update/refresh/redesign extravaganza for all Mac products, therewith astonishing and mesmerizing the lot of us with delicious computing delights that we dare not dream of.
I want to believe...
very thorough, very niceHow could Apple make it less tall, lighter, more powerful?
XPS 15: 11-17mm (0.45-0.667")
XPS 13: 9-15mm (0.33 – 0.6")
13" MBP: 18mm (0.71")
15" MBP: 18mm (0.71")
MBA: 3-17mm (0.11-0.67")
rMB: 3.5-13mm (0.14–0.52")
The 15" rMBP has kept the same height - 18mm whilst improving it's battery 28% from the previous generation, and getting a 5% increase between the 2013 vs 2015 models.
The 13" rMBP has gone from 19mm to 18mm - whilst keeping it's battery fairly similar (74 -> 71.8 to 74.9Wh - improving it's battery 17% from the previous generation.
Every generation, the battery has been higher Wh, and there have been improvements from previous models.
This happening as the rMBP went from 19mm to 18mm.
The 13" 2nd gen MBP was 4.5lb (2.04kg), now it's 3.48lb (1.58kg) - 1 lb / ~500g lighter.
The 15" 1st and 2nd gen MBP were ~5.6 lb (2.5kg) and rMBP 3rd gen now 4.49 lb (2.04kg) - also ~1lb lighter.
Apple does seem to have a track record of being able to reduce weight, improve battery, whilst improving performance.
Will the CPU be less powerful than wanted by some? Yes
Will any dGPU be less powerful than wanted by some? Yes
Will it be an improvement on the current ones in terms of weight, size, and performance? I'd say likely. If it's not Town Hall (300 seats), but before WWDC - there's always Yerba Buena Centre (700 odd seats) (Flint seems a bit big) 😉
Boring battery info
15" MBP Batteries 1st Generation
Early 2006, Late 2006, Mid 2007, Late 2007, Early 2008: 60 Wh
2nd Generation - Unibody
Late 2008, Early 2009: 50Wh
Mid 2009: 73Wh
Mid 2010, Early 2011, Late 2011, Mid 2012: 77.5Wh
Retina 15"
Mid 2012, Late 2012, Early 2013, Late 2013: 95Wh
Early 2015, Mid 2015: 99.5Wh
It would be not good for my health if they do that. I'd be extremely happy thoughYeah that's pretty much my theory as well... they saved the Macs for a massive b-day celebration... I hope..
If they wanted to release new MBP on 1st April,then they would have surely announced them at 21.Who would miss that great opportunity?
In July 1976 the Apple I went on sale for $666.66 (aside: evil, much? hehe).
I hereby propose the theory that to celebrate 40 years of Apple computers (that's right, *computers*; indeed that product family which inspired and defined Apple for the majority of its corporate existence), Apple will announce on April 1st, 2016 (Apple's 40th anniversary since founding) an across-the-board update/refresh/redesign extravaganza for all Mac products, therewith astonishing and mesmerizing the lot of us with delicious computing delights that we dare not dream of.
I want to believe...
Still no-go for the MacBook Pro, though. If there was going to be a Pro redesign, they would have announced it at the Spring event and said it shipped on April 1st. A silent update on the 1st does seem reasonable, actually.
However, the Retina iMac 21.5" got released with no Keynote, so a press release is possible, since I doubt a MBP redesign will be that much different.
You know guys what I figured (D'uh)?
Not Apple's Hardware is our problem.
Not MS' Software is our problem.
Our problem is, that there are only 2 real OS's for mainstream usage.
I've been trying out different Linux Distros lately and many of them reach a comfort and usability of lets say Windows XP or even Windows 7 (ubuntu and mint). Some are artistically beautiful, lightweight and blazingly fast (like elementary OS) and considering that mostly all of Linux Software is free, that Linux is AT LEAST as stable as Windows (and doesn't have that registry, dll crap) I'm just wondering why not one big tech company is actually FUNDING some pretty advanced linux distro and support it to a point where all the little bumps (there are SOME) are ironed out and it's as shiny as OSX.
Just imagine the possibilities.
Or forget Linuxs. Just imagine there would be a third party OS developer. Something completely new, compatible with UNIX (and therefore Mac OS) and it would be free to install on any hardware. Problem solved.
I kinda feel the burn of being forced onto Apples hardware only because Im cought in their ecosystem because (admittedly) they make the best OS.
Still, I don't like Mac OS becoming more and more iOS...
Thoughts?
You know guys what I figured (D'uh)?
Not Apple's Hardware is our problem.
Not MS' Software is our problem.
Our problem is, that there are only 2 real OS's for mainstream usage.
I've been trying out different Linux Distros lately and many of them reach a comfort and usability of lets say Windows XP or even Windows 7 (ubuntu and mint). Some are artistically beautiful, lightweight and blazingly fast (like elementary OS) and considering that mostly all of Linux Software is free, that Linux is AT LEAST as stable as Windows (and doesn't have that registry, dll crap) I'm just wondering why not one big tech company is actually FUNDING some pretty advanced linux distro and support it to a point where all the little bumps (there are SOME) are ironed out and it's as shiny as OSX.
Just imagine the possibilities.
Or forget Linuxs. Just imagine there would be a third party OS developer. Something completely new, compatible with UNIX (and therefore Mac OS) and it would be free to install on any hardware. Problem solved.
I kinda feel the burn of being forced onto Apples hardware only because Im cought in their ecosystem because (admittedly) they make the best OS.
Still, I don't like Mac OS becoming more and more iOS...
Thoughts?
I'm now actively hoping for WWDC release, not earlier. Anything earlier will mean we're not getting an updated design.
Word. if there's a redesign, it's been in the works for a good long while now. ports, chips and everything ^^Why ? it is not like they are doing the redesign now...
Whatever the date, everything is most probably fixed by now.