I can a
I can agree with that, but as you mentioned, broadwell was available last fall and they're doing a redesign so they know that nothing else is available. Should have released it.
Regarding the 16GB iPhone...you know what they say about assumptions. That is not a decision that you will ever find me defending. I think that 16GB is way too little. If you have to go around inventing things like app thinning and the ability to delete apps on phones just to be able to download an OS upgrade, then you are obviously doing it wrong. That was a pure profit decision which, again, you'll never see me defend.
I do think that the Broadwell issue is more nuanced that that, which is why I am willing to defend Apple in this case, and I've already given my reasons. Apple refreshed the 15" MBP in May 2015 before the quad core Broadwell chips were out. Once Apple releases a model, they usually keep it on the market for at least six months (if you go back and look at the last ten years, at least). Perhaps they want to recoup any development costs, maybe they don't want to piss off anyone who's already purchased a released model by updating it too soon, or they just don't want to release too many models. They were never ever going to release a Broadwell 15" a month or so after they had just put the Mid 2015 15" MBP out on the market.
I suppose they could have squished an additional refresh in this past fall in order to bring it fully up-to-date, but by then Broadwell was already out of date anyways, and Intel had fully moved onto Skylake. They would have been between a rock and a hard place because by that point everyone wanted Skylake and wouldn't have been satisfied with a Broadwell based 15" MBP. I think that Apple decided to cut their loses, reorientate themselves, and concentrate on what was the new processor line out on the market.
I think that Intel really threw things off because not only were they late to market with Broadwell, but they cut it's lifecycle down to be much shorter than it should have been in order to not be late with Skylake. Apple, I think, is trying to reorientate themselves with Intel's new release cycles.
Yes, I know that money is the primary reason behind their decisions, as it is for any company. However, what I am saying is that the decision to keep Haswell in the 15" was not based on money in my opinion. I mean, they put Broadwell in the 13". If they were so concerned about penny pinching they could have kept Haswell in it as well. So why didn't they? Because the processor was available when they needed it to be...that's why. It wasn't for the 15".
I can agree with that, but as you mentioned, broadwell was available last fall and they're doing a redesign so they know that nothing else is available. Should have released it.