How many people in here complaining about emoji are 1) software developers or 2) content creators? It seems most arguments go something like, "Apple is no longer focused on developers and creators. They're too concerned with customers who don't even care about stuff like messaging and emoji." As a content creator myself, I completely disagree. You can't sell to the 1% of people who think like you, at least not if you want to maximize profit.
People care about some really stupid stuff. Stuff like fireworks and emoji in messaging sells iPhones. And to counter the inevitable argument: just because YOU don't care about it, doesn't mean consumers don't and, just because the small subset of people you choose to pay attention to don't care, doesn't mean consumers don't. Maybe Apple's making a big mistake focusing on these things, maybe all the commenters on here could run Apple better than Tim Cook as long as they focus on what they think Almighty Steve Jobs would have done.
Chances are most complainers on here would run Apple into the ground. Why? Because they would pay Intel billions of dollars to somehow figure out a way to manufacture top-of-the-line, laptop versions of their processors FIRST, rather than learn from mistakes made with desktop and low-power configurations at the start of a chip generation and work their way up. They would also pay Intel gobs of money to get their hands on the processors first, a foolhardy exclusivity agreement which would only appeal to the most zealous first adopters and only speed up a laptop generation by 1-2 months at most.
But like it or not, Apple is focusing on consumers because that's where the money is. If and when the new MBP comes out, if you don't like it nobody is holding a gun to your head making you buy it. But those consumers fund Apple, and if the Skylake MBP is good then you have those consumer's funding to thank for it.
If you're a developer or content creator, you should know this by now, unless you're a developer or content creation drone who never makes decisions based on consumer sentiment and leaves those big decisions to your bosses. I don't have that luxury, which means I need my finger on the pulse of consumers or my business will go under. And consumers, bless their feeble hearts, like things I find utterly useless (like pro sports, for example).
I think it goes beyond Apple's market focus, like you say, obviously Apple has to cater to the needs of consumers cos its a business first, tech innovator second. It's obvious that a lot of its decisions, as a company, will be made based on what will maximise their profits. That bit I can understand, and I'm sure many here who ridicule emojis can understand too, like Apple's decision to cut discounts and benefits and essentially empty their stock during the back to school promotion, it's not cool but I get it it's a business.
The problem is though, many people here became fans of Apple because of its dedication to great products that generate a great experience. Which many I think feel, Apple does less of nowadays. I'm neither a dev nor a graphic artist, a lot of my work involves basic content creation and general marketing, while data science is a small hobby I'm starting to develop. I personally have great interest in technology and want to see companies push their potential, that obviously isn't limited to Apple, I expect Samsung and Microsoft to keep innovating as well.
You mentioned Steve Jobs, and I agree that he's not exactly a character for all, it's a straight split, either you like him or you don't. The general portrayal in media or literature is that he was a visionary tyrant and whether that's true or not it did translate into product development with Apple gaining its 'walled garden' reputation. Many of the fans were happy to pay the extra costs and stay in that walled garden because Apple created a positive experience for many and it continued to innovate to improve that. Sometimes it meant listening to consumers, and sometimes it meant going its own way.
I think people are pissed at the emoji focus because that's just not Apple. When everyone else was competing with who can build bigger phones, Apple decided that 4 inches are a perfect size for people to use their phones in, I think Jobs would have signed off on the 4.5 inch screen but the general idea is that 5.5 inch is just too big. (before people start bashing me saying big phones are great and that Apple now makes them too, just consider if phones really need to be that big to perform their function as phones) Apple stood its ground to push innovation in what it believed was the right way.
Now... Present day Apple focused 30 minutes of a WWDC keynote discussing updates to a messaging app (15 of which were dedicated to emojis) And like you said it was because it has to cater to the consumer needs. But that's the whole problem, it was selling and not innovating. It used to be that you could blindly trust Apple to make an amazing product but now it needs to sell to you.
Also, Apple speaks of its products as tools for creatives, a tool that can unlock human potential and add more onto it. I personally didn't see too much focus on that in their OS developments, instead I saw 'me too' features to cater to their most profitable markets. I was a bit unfair a few posts back when I said it was acting like a pre-teen kid who just discovered messaging and emojis (I said that because a lot of its features have been on other platforms for ages, heck even paying contacts has been around in WeChat, Kakao, Paym, etc. Apple isn't innovating!!)
The only way the focus on emojis makes sense is that it's an attempt to further take over in the Asian market where emojis and stickers are massive and the messaging market is difficult to penetrate due to the aforementioned apps. So for them to turn it into a fully fledged open platform makes perfect business sense, they have to adapt to generate more profit. Which again is the root problem that Apple no longer charges people for innovation but instead it tries to milkout more from loyal customers.
TL