If thats the case we would have reach 1000 pages and I believe the next thread will be waiting for Kabylake refresh ?
hey guise...
![]()
So can't someone just make up a new rumour to keep it a bit fun?
"And if you use your finger on this emojiselector we've built into the keyboard, you can select the emoji you want, and then scale your emoji! We feel this is SO IMPORTANT that we refuse to let developers use the emojiselector for anything else! Also, all Macbook Pros can now ONLY use iMessage. No other applications are important enough to deserve 30 minutes of time at an apple developer keynote!"By the way, you know what the new OLED bar is good for as well?
3x bigger emoji!!
OT: KabyLake huh? Would be nice if Apple was leading again and attract more people to buy Macs! Looking forward to the coming months, still hoping for a refresh in July though![]()
hey guise...
![]()
Its not unprecentended for apple to have early access to intel chips
If apple could get kaby lake with GT3e graphics in the fall then I think its worth the wait (native 10bit HEVC decoding and HDMI 2.0 + HDCP 2.2 support). Its not unprecentended for apple to have early access to intel chips
Its extremely unlikely and just wishful thinking on my part that we'd get kaby lake in the fall. The thing is 4k blu ray and most 4k video is moving to 10bit and I'd like to be able to output that quality. I dont mind having an adapter from USB C /TB3, i just would rather have native capabilityI don't think that'll be possible.
Resolution wise, I just want a Mac that can output normal (8 bit?) 4K@60Hz through HDMI. Even if it needs a TB3->HDMI adapter.
In order of importance:
- Me being drunk
- Kittens
- Me being drunk again
- More kittens
- "Will the next MBP use Kaby Lake?"
- Memes (and more kittens of course)
- "I don't want dGPU"
- "I want dGPU"
plus some suicides, identity crisis, delusions, depression, lost faith in human race.
It's a nice place to be, this.
first gen mba
I'm secretly holding out hope that Apple bitch slapped Intel for screwing them over with the Skylake delay (making them look bad for skipping Broadwell) and got exclusive rights to an early release of suitable Kabylake procs. THAT'S the Apple I used to respect.
Now its, lets see what everyone else does. OK, looks cool, lets wait till it's dirt cheap to implement and then charge a premium!
First gen MacBook Air used a Core 2 Duo 'Merom' series, right? From what I know it was a custom chip, but certainly not a generation ahead of design schedule.
Besides, Intel was much less organized with their release schedules before the Core i series. Apple doesn't have a magic wand they can wave to make Intel products come out early, no matter how much Kaby Lakers wish it.
Apple have had amble time to release Skylake based Macbook Pros. Apple could have used manufacturing samples when designing a new MBP and released the machines upon Skylake availability.
Though, it would be very nice if the next MBPs contained Kabylake CPUs....
I'm secretly holding out hope that Apple bitch slapped Intel for screwing them over with the Skylake delay (making them look bad for skipping Broadwell) and got exclusive rights to an early release of suitable Kabylake procs. THAT'S the Apple I used to respect.
Now its, lets see what everyone else does. OK, looks cool, lets wait till it's dirt cheap to implement and then charge a premium!
If apple could get kaby lake with GT3e graphics in the fall then I think its worth the wait (native 10bit HEVC decoding and HDMI 2.0 + HDCP 2.2 support). Its not unprecentended for apple to have early access to intel chips
If they miss the back to school window, it will be q1 2017.
Company focus is on selling hardware with the new OS on board and iPhone 7/pad/watch/app holiday sales.
Q1 2017 will give Apple Mac team the space they need to scrap the plan A design and accelerate their plan X design.
The 2012 may have been the last "laptop" form factor. I genuinely thought there'd be one final 2016 laptop.
The 2012 may have been the last "laptop" form factor
2017? Are you nuts?
Why would Intel favor Apple over PC manufacturers (e.g. Dell, HP, etc.) when the PC manufacturers sell many more units than Apple? Intel doesn't care about the Apple premium or prestige or profit. They care about number of units sold. The only exception would be if Apple pays them a ludicrous amount of money for early access...which will probably be seen as anti-competitive or a bribe.