It won't go to 15W. More because of GPU performance than CPU performance imo.
Edit: I haz typo
What's the CPU performance difference between a 15W and 25W? That Stealth is somewhat enticing.
It won't go to 15W. More because of GPU performance than CPU performance imo.
Edit: I haz typo
Razer just updated the Stealth with Kaby Lake chips, 16gb RAM and improved battery. And this thread marches on.
Is that not quite a weedy chip for such a high end laptop (15W, 2 cores, Intel HD iGPU)? With the gfx it's understandable that they want you to pair it with the Core eGPU, but for processing, why do Apple have such higher standards?For those who are curious Blade stealth uses i7-7500U chip.
The Blade Stealth is their Ultrabook. The Razer Blade is their gaming laptop.Is that not quite a weedy chip for such a high end laptop (15W, 2 cores, Intel HD iGPU)? With the gfx it's understandable that they want you to pair it with the Core eGPU, but for processing, why do Apple have such higher standards?
OK, thanks. And welcome "Srb001" - it's too much to hope you're Serban right?The Blade Stealth is their Ultrabook. The Razer Blade is their gaming laptop.
since the kaby lake is not such an improvement over skylake i hope Apple with an event in October for 1 hour at least, to announce the 13/15 Macbook pros,
It won't go to 15W. More because of GPU performance than CPU performance imo.
Edit: I haz typo
All the news about Kaby Lake so far suggests it will be an improvement for 4K video, but not much else. Since we're closing in on 900 pages and I need to do my part, if we were to get top-of-the-line skylake 15" MBPs with a dGPU, how much better would 4K performance be in a similarly equipped MBP with Kaby Lake
Well not the product itself, however the intentions behind it can be associated with greed. The intention behind TFT panels and 5400 rpm HDDs.
Is English not your first language? I think there's some miscommunication going on here, otherwise you would've understood where I'm coming from, in regards to the statements I've made.
False prophet.OK, thanks. And welcome "Srb001" - it's too much to hope you're Serban right?
Link to Kaby Lake benchmarks please?Kaby Lake again features like 30-40% GPU improvement, 12% CPU performance. In addition it does 4k in Hardware and native TB3. Not substantial? In my little world thats pretty big.
Kaby Lake again features like 30-40% GPU improvement, 12% CPU performance. In addition it does 4k in Hardware and native TB3. Not substantial? In my little world thats pretty big.
haha no
why not hackintosh?I couldn't control my need to buy something, so I bought an Intel nuc (i7-6770) with 32gb ram and two 500gb Ssd drives. I'm installing Linux atm. 1000€ for the whole setup.
the GPU Intel 620 of the upcoming CPU generation "Kaby Lake" could see a performance improvement of up to 50 % compared to the current HD Graphics 520."
10% - 50% increase CPU/gpu performance is heaps good. I don't know why people claim Intel is stagnating or how kaby isn't a upgrade