Time for my first post

I've been actively reading the forums on macrumors and
enjoy the various topics regarding the MBPs everyone seems to be waiting for (just like me).
What has happened to the MBP in the last two and a half years is a BIG management error - and not just one.
The MBP should have been updated with a Browadwell chipset early 2015.
It should have been updated with Skylake mid 2016 (asap).
It ought to be updated with Kaby Lake by mid 2017 - and yes, I know this won't happen if Intel won't produce the appropriate chipsets (which they allegedly won't).
I am not convinced this is an /error/ yet, but it is certainly not the direction I, as a customer, would like. I will grant that if the Mac Pro experience is anything to go by, it is likely to prove an error.
However, take a step back and put this into context, and there may be a method to the madness.
Apple is transitioning to a fashion company. New generations of CPU and other hardware have more and more marginal advances, so you do not see a significant benefit upgrading anywhere near as frequently - so the next major Mac shipment, with Jony Ives at the helm, is likely to be a fashionable re-imagining, rather than a pitch for the hard-core customer. That is just where the market is today, love it or loathe it.
If you want the new fashionable, minimalist enclosure to look good on paper, it needs a relatively large spec-bump compared to the previous generation. Skipping two or three families of CPU will do that for you - you can ship a computer of similar power in a much more fashionable enclosure, and shout about a few choice benchmarks where you can see a big gain.
As we have been waiting so long, everyone jumps onto the new hardware at about the same time, and so the Mac hardware can go into a slower refresh cycle, as notebooks/desktop customers upgrade on a slower cycle than phone customers, and now everyone has synchronized to the same cycle. This allows a bottleneck, like running every product int he company through Jony Ives, to handle the wider range of Apple products today.
All speculation on my part, but quite possibly intentional, rather than accidental neglect, and even though I dislike this direction, we will need to wait a few years to see if it is a genuine error, rather than a course (some) existing customers do not like - but actually a good choice for the brand/company.
I fear the precedent of the Mac Pro, but the jury is still out on the MacBook Pro.