OK... I'm sure that whatever you say must be right. Its too small a point to keep beating at.
Dude, they're called facts. If you just make stuff up people will call you out on it.
OK... I'm sure that whatever you say must be right. Its too small a point to keep beating at.
I've had the use of all three major systems: Windows, Apple, and Ubuntu Linux. I have ubuntu on a current laptop my Thinkpad x200 machine. I also have a bootable drive with Windows 10 on it in addition to Windows XP running in virtual Box in the Host Ubuntu. And I have El Capitan running on both the iMac and the MBP.
You can do what you need in all three, but only one of them is actually fun to use: El Capitan. And while I've owned Dells and Thinkpads; they are all just black plastic boxes. My old 1st gen MBP was plastic and classier and more fun than any of the black plastic boxes. The Titanium Powerbook 800 was pretty classy for the time. But only the iMac and the current MBP are solid builds.
When we buy a Mac, we get more than just a disjointed box of electronics. We get a solid, beautiful and fun system to work on. Once you experience the others, most people will gravitate back to the Mac, unless they are really devoid of any imagination at all. For those people, then its all about what the electronic parts are, and the need to be mixing and matching with parts, Imagination and Fun are not part of the package.
anything to do with more or less imagination to enjoy one or the other.
Chiming in here after awhile, this time after reading the bitc…, er, griping about costs over time. I don't profess to know every little detail about Apple's cost determinations. I do cost out future expenditures for my clients, a little more than 25 years of this forecasting under my belt. A few nits to pick…
Inflation has pretty much nothing to do with forecasting prices or resolving past prices. That linked-to BLS database describes urban buyers, not including fuel costs (and food, which isn't relevant here). I use BLS data every day. That urban database provides no real relationship specific to the computer/electronics industry, doesn't reflect tariffs or the price of fuel, Apple's cost for floating bonds to buyout shareholders, the cost of building dozens of Apple Stores and hiring thousands of employees around the world (plus future benefits), creating and maintaining infrastructure (the "gimme, gimme now" factor as I tend to put it to my clients), paying off patent trolls (the iPhone didn't exist in 2006…) - this is just off the top of my head…
Apple used to charge for OS X updates, and yet another one was pushed out at no cost just today. Yet another "gimme" bit we now take for granted…
I run a SMB, with business that crosses international lines, but a 50-employee company, that's all. But, "facts" about finances/costs mean nothing relative to the final price to the client/consumer, really… The cited database doesn't address costs from overseas operations or expected legal costs of doing business or failed relationships. I'd just offer that using a cost relationship index doesn't really address what happens in our real world…
I'll agree with your fairly simplistic point of view, being a consumer. The business owner side of me doesn't agree with that "dumbed-down" perspective (and that's not a slant, nor am I trying to angle in anything here as I feel it's a far more complicated situation that I can back up in my industry), and oil costs are indeed a factor - Apple flies product here from Asia, and the price of jet fuel doesn't follow the same trends as the Brent Crude market price - the cost of insurance, salaries for the pilots/crews, and maintenance of those planes has gone up, and I read my bills of lading. Never mind the destruction of one of the largest flash chip manufacturers last year contributing to the higher price of memory and most of the makers moving over to DDR4 for smartphones…Yes, true, but the argument is whether consumers paid more for MBPs in 2006 or 2016, so most of that is completely irrelevant in a consumer's mind. One of the major arguments with inflation is fuel costs, but the price of oil is significantly less right now than in 2006. I don't think anyone could argue 2006 MBPs were "much more expensive than the models we have today" with the top of the line model being $3,949 today.
I'll agree with your fairly simplistic point of view, being a consumer. The business owner side of me doesn't agree with that "dumbed-down" perspective
Hmmm. Like I wrote, I own and run a business. You don't have to deal with the many, many hands in the till. I wrote that I am not slanting my perspective, bummed that you're taking it that way. I'm not well-informed or brilliant - I have 53 mouths to feed every week. If you take offense to that, so be it. I respected your position, not so much now. No "haha" about it, you just don't get it IMHO. I'll be ignoring you from here on…Haha, slant taken. You're clearly too well-informed and brilliant to understand the simple-minded peasant consumers.
You'd be a perfect fit at Apple![]()
Seems that we will have 17" MBP, with those desktop class 32RAM, 92 watt hour battery,2400p display,and amd 470 and 6 core cpu kaby lake all at 5.1 pounds
That depends how long the plumber takes to unclog Tim's pipeline...What is the consensus estimated release date for the new macs?
Apple still offers the 2015 rMBP 15" with iGPU only. I have the 2.5 GHz model which I will not update to Sierra. I will stay as long as possible with El Capitan and everything works very well for me. I use Office 2016, Matlab, Lightroom 6 and some X-Code. For work I use Windows 10 bootcamp under a Parallels VM with Office 2016, Matlab and Visual Studio.Hi guys, I'm back because macOS Sierra blew out my 2011/17 dGPU (finally I guess). It couldn't take anymore, still works but it's awkward. But now I got my 2015/15 that I bought about 4 months ago and that thing is CRUSHING.
I am hoping to get a rMBP 2017/15 but I don't see any iGPU only models other than the rMBP 2016/13 inch... I can't do 13 inch...
I know I know I went all crazy about how the dGPU switching was going to be an issue in the other "Waiting for SkyLake rMBP thread" and got blasted for it, but a... yeah, so anyway.
Anybody got any thoughts on if they will be able to make a "capable" iGPU only 15 inch model by the end of the year?
That's what I am really looking for. Not wanting to get all into the dGPU MALARKEY, if you know what I mean.
But man yeah a good iGPU only 2017/15 w/TouchBar would be pretty great!
Laters...
Hi guys, I'm back because macOS Sierra blew out my 2011/17 dGPU (finally I guess). It couldn't take anymore, still works but it's awkward. But now I got my 2015/15 that I bought about 4 months ago and that thing is CRUSHING.
I am hoping to get a rMBP 2017/15 but I don't see any iGPU only models other than the rMBP 2016/13 inch... I can't do 13 inch...
I know I know I went all crazy about how the dGPU switching was going to be an issue in the other "Waiting for SkyLake rMBP thread" and got blasted for it, but a... yeah, so anyway.
Anybody got any thoughts on if they will be able to make a "capable" iGPU only 15 inch model by the end of the year?
That's what I am really looking for. Not wanting to get all into the dGPU MALARKEY, if you know what I mean.
But man yeah a good iGPU only 2017/15 w/TouchBar would be pretty great!
Laters...
Hi guys, I'm back because macOS Sierra blew out my 2011/17 dGPU (finally I guess). It couldn't take anymore, still works but it's awkward.
Apple still offers the 2015 rMBP 15" with iGPU only. I have the 2.5 GHz model which I will not update to Sierra. I will stay as long as possible with El Capitan and everything works very well for me. I use Office 2016, Matlab, Lightroom 6 and some X-Code. For work I use Windows 10 bootcamp under a Parallels VM with Office 2016, Matlab and Visual Studio.
The best thing is this: I can still use my old mag-save power supplies the I have distributed everywhere where I use the Notebook. I can connect the beamers at work directly to the HDMI port. I can read my camera's SD card directly in the Notebook. I can connect my 4k display at home directly to the mini display port. I can use all my external storage directly with the USB 3.0 ports.
If Apple doesn't change their strategy, my next Notebook will be a Windows only version. I have tested the Windows only version with an ASUS Zenbook 15" last year. Currently I still prefer the Macbook with OS X where I can swipe Windows away with 3 fingers when it wants to do updates etc.
Apple still offers the 2015 rMBP 15" with iGPU only. I have the 2.5 GHz model which I will not update to Sierra. I will stay as long as possible with El Capitan and everything works very well for me. I use Office 2016, Matlab, Lightroom 6 and some X-Code. For work I use Windows 10 bootcamp under a Parallels VM with Office 2016, Matlab and Visual Studio.
The best thing is this: I can still use my old mag-save power supplies the I have distributed everywhere where I use the Notebook. I can connect the beamers at work directly to the HDMI port. I can read my camera's SD card directly in the Notebook. I can connect my 4k display at home directly to the mini display port. I can use all my external storage directly with the USB 3.0 ports.
If Apple doesn't change their strategy, my next Notebook will be a Windows only version. I have tested the Windows only version with an ASUS Zenbook 15" last year. Currently I still prefer the Macbook with OS X where I can swipe Windows away with 3 fingers when it wants to do updates etc.
What iGpu will the kaby lame 15" Mbp will have?
16 GBI'm using Sierra on my early 2011 17" 8 GB with no dGPU issues, though I haven't done much to challenge it. How much RAM do you have? Of course, the dGPU may be failing just due to age. (If it runs hot, open the back up and blow the lint and dust out.)
Jony (the person in charge of design) and Tim (the person who decided to release the computer despite battery problems) are gone?!?!The guys responsible for the macbook battery debacle have been fired