Seems you cant understand,same usage on both, for surfacebook 2 has 7-8hours gap from what microsoft says and apple has at max 1 hour
If you go heavy on the sb2 the battery is draining even when its charging , and without from 100 to 5% it takes 3hours and 20 min
BS
Ignorance
The current MacBooks don't last that long.
The surface book 2 is nowhere near as bad as you're claiming. It's more powerful, higher spec in every way, etc
It drains 1-2% an hour under heavy gaming so you can carry a lighter adapter..
Just stop buying computers
[doublepost=1512095052][/doublepost]
This means you have a lower Center of gravity, smaller frame body as in less flex in your spine/torso than someone much taller than you (e.g. me at 5’11). You should be able to carry a few pounds in your backpack especially if your young for a few hundred metres without a thought in your mind of pain/weight. That is unless you have an injury or predisposed issue with rroator cuffs, collarbone or seriously big breasted (unbalanced weight stress on lower back).
I'm thinking too many people are seriously out of shape and or just like to wine for any bit of work that involves the human body. All those artist drawings of alien sightings showing fail bodies is were we’ll all end up looking like because a half pound is too heavy in a knapsack. If you’re baked body no issues 2pounds is what you should be able to ‘notice’ not a half pound.
Now I feel like an idiot complaining about someone complaining about .5lbs. But I work in L2 I.T. Direct customer facing and I hear this same complaint every upgrade cycle for. Able bodied grown ups.
MacOS X does need a UI refresh even if just the theme. Used to love the .1-10 updates prior to mavericks.
I’m curious ... when Phil retires who’s next in line for hardware executive VP? We have so many Executive VP’s at Apple for Siri, Software, iPhone hardware, Design, iOS UI, etc but there is no distinct Mac Hardware VP just the cpu design and an executive who overlaps from iPhone iPad and Mac intros. Would love to see distinction in leadership for each. Maybe then we’d see better updates and more focus in the hardware feature implementation. Maybe MagSafe would not have left.
I'm quite fit.
I wish I didn't even have to carry a bag to work. Who does? It's annoying.
If I want to exercise I will do it when it's convenient for me.
Besides walking in my normal day why would you try to combine things like that?
Maybe we should all wear those ankle weights. No wait, that's stupid..
[doublepost=1512095344][/doublepost]
An out of the box thought.. this might provoke a lot of reaction, I hope!!
Just what if Apple ditch Intel in favour of AMD for cpus? After all they already use AMD graphics... I already have custom built many Ryzen and Threadripper systems for many people including myself, and with rumours of new Ryzen and Threadripper CPUS next year why not have more options for whatever MacBook line up there is available to include these as well... it could only be "good for business" surely !?! Any thoughts on this.. after all AMD are owned by Samsung anyway, just incase people forgot!! ..... I'd buy a MacBook Pro with a Threadripper 1950x(mobile version) in it over an inflated i9 every time!! Also on this topic why isn't there an i9 anyway ? that would tempt the "pros".... especially since the iMac Pro should be avoided until they bring out modified versions later on...
My new quote is "never buy version1 of of anything, it's buggy and we are essentially the beta testers for them!"
Intel is still king.
Check the details at AnandTech comparing them.
It would be a pretty big downgrade in general.
[doublepost=1512095774][/doublepost]
I own the 2016 version and I love it, just get Apple Care with it (just in case) and you'll be fine. It's not that big of an issue as the forum is saying it is.
Yes. "Just" spend a couple hundred dollars more on an already overpriced laptop so you're covered when shoddy quality comes around to bite you.
Apple Loves you!