It doesn’t really work when you could get your work done on a basic £400 windows computer. It especially doesn’t work when you just like shiny new toys every 2-3 years, though perhaps therein lies the answer - I don’t want to be using a computer to death, but 4 years is probably doable (psychologically it’s more difficult when you have to stretch to 4 rather than move on at 2-3, but it’s doable). If I upgrade less often I’m basically pickpocketing Apple for the extra money back. I might even stretch my iPhone purchases out longer too as they’re going in a direction I’m honestly not all that fussed on. Yes I think that’s the answer, as Apple turn the thumb screws on the pricing, I just try to not spend any more, even if it means keeping devices longer. Guess I will be waiting it out until at least 2019 then...The question you should be asking to justify a $6,700 or $2,399 computer is how long it would take to make that money back. If you are not gonna be able to make back that money, you probably should let that money stay in your bank account and or buy something that fits in your budget.
Gotta love these ridiculous comments... non-insane prices. So then I assume you said the same thing last year, oh and the year before that?
2018 base 15” - $2,399
2017 base 15” - $2,399
2016 base 15” - $2,399
The $6,700 version is not the only option... and I really wonder what people think a laptop with a FOUR TERABYTE SSD is going to cost, they’re still really pricey, as others have noted time and again - guess what, their drives are better than that ADATA budget drive you got from Newegg.
People are just never happy, first no professional could possibly get work done with ONLY 16 gb of ram, never mind that it’s been fine all along, and now when we get the option people are whining that it doesn’t cost the same as the old options, get a grip.
Oh, and yeah non-TB option would be fine... I love it for touchID but that’s about all I use mine for
How about:
2012 base rMBP 15" w/16GB - $2400 - 256GB SSD / 16GB RAM / Discrete graphics
Funny how the memory/storage included has not increased in 6 years. I guarantee that component costs are not the same as they were in mid-2012.
It doesn’t really work when you could get your work done on a basic £400 windows computer. It especially doesn’t work when you just like shiny new toys every 2-3 years, though perhaps therein lies the answer - I don’t want to be using a computer to death, but 4 years is probably doable (psychologically it’s more difficult when you have to stretch to 4 rather than move on at 2-3, but it’s doable). If I upgrade less often I’m basically pickpocketing Apple for the extra money back. I might even stretch my iPhone purchases out longer too as they’re going in a direction I’m honestly not all that fussed on. Yes I think that’s the answer, as Apple turn the thumb screws on the pricing, I just try to not spend any more, even if it means keeping devices longer. Guess I will be waiting it out until at least 2019 then...
I could buy a new MacBook Pro right now, but I can't really justify it when mine is doing what I need, although its straining at times with the couple Windows VM's I run. The larger screen (currently using a 13 inch) would be a nice upgrade. Apple is being a little unreasonable though with the entry price on the 15 inch.
They could use even the entry level touch bar 13 inch specs; and or even remove the touch bar alltogeter to produce a more affordable priced 15 inch SKU for those who want just a larger screen. They had this many years ago until the retina model was introduced.
I could see something like this going for 1,800 to 2,000, still overpriced, but not leaving an extreme bad taste.
It seems Apple is intentionally wanting to make laptops a niche product and pushing users to buy an iPad or MacBook if you do want a laptop Mac.
It is frustrating - I genuinely can’t see why they couldn’t slot the 2017 model in at the $1,999 price point the 2015 just vacated, apart from greed. I’d like to think they will come along with a 15” MacBook at the $1,799 price point or so, but no official rumours for thatI could buy a new MacBook Pro right now, but I can't really justify it when mine is doing what I need, although its straining at times with the couple Windows VM's I run. The larger screen (currently using a 13 inch) would be a nice upgrade. Apple is being a little unreasonable though with the entry price on the 15 inch.
They could use even the entry level touch bar 13 inch specs; and or even remove the touch bar alltogeter to produce a more affordable priced 15 inch SKU for those who want just a larger screen. They had this many years ago until the retina model was introduced.
I could see something like this going for 1,800 to 2,000, still overpriced, but not leaving an extreme bad taste.
It seems Apple is intentionally wanting to make laptops a niche product and pushing users to buy an iPad or MacBook if you do want a laptop Mac.
The XPS isn’t an exact like for like comparison as it uses the G series quad core with AMD GPU - but it’s honesly good enough for my use and literally £1,000 cheaper!
XPS seems much more cheaper
XPS 15 9570 with:
15.6 3840 x 2160 screen
i7-8750H (6 cores)
32Gb Ram
1TB SSD
GTX 1050Ti
- £1,998.42
MBP 2018 15 with:
15 inch retina
i7-8750H
32Gb Ram
1TB SSD
Radeon Pro 560X
- £3,419.00
Hude price difference!
I have actually spec'ed one out. Max 15" MacBook Pro except for only 1TB of SSD is actually cheaper this time than what I spent maxed 2016 15" with 1TB SSD.
[doublepost=1531574783][/doublepost]
Seriously. I had to deal with such comments when I got my 2010 Mac Pro having people tell me they could build a better desktop under $500. Except it was factually impossible as the Xeon processor alone at the time was $1,000 itself.
People are forgetting so many things when comparing Macs to Dells and others. It not just matching Processor A with Processor A.
As someone who spent $1,000 on Windows 10 licenses when it first hit the market and loved it so much, I made sure I had everyone I knew took part of the free upgrade. It blew Windows 7 and Windows 8 away.
However, over the years, Windows 10 keeps getting worse and worse every major release. I got back to my computer one day and it automatically installed the 1803 update. Except, my entire workflow was screwed up. Visual Studio started freezing all the time. Widespread Chrome issues were forcing me to use a different browser. Outlook was freezing and forced me to use the Outlook Web App for more reliable experience.
When 1607 released, it corrupted Windows Update. There were five other computers in my lab that experience the same thing. Every time I ran Windows Update it would error out. The only fix was to download a cumulative update from Microsoft's update catalog website and run the Windows Update troubleshooter after. This was a known issue as the cumulative update resolved the issue with Windows Update
When 1607 released, all my desktop shortcuts and start menu items were failing to open first time per restart. This was a very common issue. When you clicked on an icon, it would say "This stub received a bad data". Clicking on the icon again allowed the program to open normally. Spending hours trying to get it resolved - my only solution was to apply a cumulative update. Oh but remember what I mentioned above? I was unable to run Windows Update too so I had to spend time diagnosing that issue
When 1511 was released, my antivirus was forcefully uninstalled. Causing time from my work day to reinstall and relicense my software.
When 1511 was released, there was a known issue with Disk Cleanup utility built in to Windows. Five of our lab computers ran Disk Cleanup and restarted. They were treated with a screen saying Windows was unable to boot. Three were able to be resolved with Startup Repair using offline media and the DISM command. The two others were, thankfully, being backed up with Acronis so only a day was lost.
So as someone that loved Windows 10 at launch, I am getting so fed up with it. I am happy to pay the "apple tax" as what some people call it to have macOS included. Not to mention Windows 10 causing issues on Microsoft's own hardware.
It is not just matching Processor A to Processor A when people run these spec comparisons as to the difference between Apple and the Windows environment.
Will need to modify my wish list based on what the 2018 models checked off...
Done.
Hex-core Coffee LakeHex-core Cannon Lake- More reliable keyboard
32 GB DDR4 RAM32 GB DDR4 RAM as standard- Increased display resolution
- Lowered base price
Sorry it was meant to be the X360 I typed - there is a ‘2 in 1’ variant of the XPS though that folds back like the X360 and I think that uses G series too. I’ve yet to see anything on the 555X but the GPU in the G series chips is competitive with a 1050 (not so much Ti) which makes it better than the 555 and maybe just edges out the 560https://www.dell.com/en-uk/shop/lap...tops/new-xps-15-laptop/spd/xps-15-9570-laptop
Unless I am missing something, It is the same 6 Core CPU, you get a Nvidia 1050Ti 4GB GDDR5, let call that the same as AMD 555X 4GB GDDR5, 16GB of DDR4 Memory, 512GB SSD. So it is roughly the same.
For MBP, You do get a much faster SSD, the Apple SSD is very fast, along with 1300 Mbps 3x3 802.11ac, which is more than those standard 2x2 866Mbps WiFi in Dell.
If you spec the Entry Version of 15" MBP Touch Bar to match the XPS, it would cost £2529, still £630 more expensive. Again more then the usual £300 - £400 premium. Again we are paying £230 for Touch Bar.
XPS 15 price and specs are really tempting. The big issue for me is Windows OS.XPS seems much more cheaper
XPS 15 9570 with:
15.6 3840 x 2160 screen
i7-8750H (6 cores)
32Gb Ram
1TB SSD
GTX 1050Ti
- £1,998.42
MBP 2018 15 with:
15 inch retina
i7-8750H
32Gb Ram
1TB SSD
Radeon Pro 560X
- £3,419.00
Hude price difference!
Same here, but in all honesty, I'll not be waiting another year. My purchasing of a laptop is sooner then later.XPS 15 price and specs are really tempting. The big issue for me is Windows OS.
XPS seems much more cheaper
XPS 15 9570 with:
15.6 3840 x 2160 screen
i7-8750H (6 cores)
32Gb Ram
1TB SSD
GTX 1050Ti
- £1,998.42
I hear ya, if I opt for a new MBP, it may very well be my last. I thought in all honesty that the 2012 was going to be my last one, but I think I may give it one more go. As for the direction, I agree, I'm not liking where apple is headed. I really do like the idea of a laptop having user replaceable parts. Its just plain silly, needing to replace the entire top case because one key broke. Apple lives by the thin sword, they'll die by the thin sword and that's what they get when gluing and soldering everything in sight. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯Generally I don’t like the direction things are headin
I can get a XPS at 1918£ but with just 16gb ram and 512 SSD...so i guess if you go 1TB and 32, it will be over 2300£XPS seems much more cheaper
XPS 15 9570 with:
15.6 3840 x 2160 screen
i7-8750H (6 cores)
32Gb Ram
1TB SSD
GTX 1050Ti
- £1,998.42
MBP 2018 15 with:
15 inch retina
i7-8750H
32Gb Ram
1TB SSD
Radeon Pro 560X
- £3,419.00
Hude price difference!
If you loose the 4K screen it will bring it back to about £2000 - but then you don’t get a 4K screenI can get a XPS at 1918£ but with just 16gb ram and 512 SSD...so i guess if you go 1TB and 32, it will be over 2300£
I can get a XPS at 1918£ but with just 16gb ram and 512 SSD...so i guess if you go 1TB and 32, it will be over 2300£
I'd also add the value of Apple's customer service, especially if live near an Apple store.I’d care to argue that Apple designs a longer lasting machine. After 6 years can you say that that XPS will still be running as fast as that equilavently specced MBP? You pay the extra for longer longevity. You also don’t have to buy a yearly subscription for malware protection, and deal with buggy Windows and bloatware
I will purchase the 2019 MB Pro if it has a 4K screen. I don't think that will happen, mind you.If you loose the 4K screen it will bring it back to about £2000 - but then you don’t get a 4K screen