89% after 2 years is very good wear. It is a very small battery. Your expectations are not realistic. Why not have Apple replace the battery? Problem solved.I called Apple today and it was a waste of time. They told me my watch (that's DRAMATICALLY WORSE) is normal @ 89% capacity after 23 months of use.
A week ago I was getting hours of additional battery life. No way I'm buying another one when they can fall off a cliff with any software update.
They told me I should be charging it twice per day.
I usually charge it fully at bedtime ~midnight. I'll put it on at 2AM or so and sleep. Rinse and repeat. My workouts are evening or as late as 9PM but the watch is dead by then.
I'm wondering if new sleep tracking is affecting it. It's fully charged when I go to sleep and ~79% most mornings when I wake. Since I never looked before I don't know how that compares but it seems like a lot for sleeping.
I think the point is that it was lasting significantly longer before the update. So regardless of how long it’s been owned or the state of the battery, os7 shouldn’t have impaired its performance like this89% after 2 years is very good wear. It is a very small battery. Your expectations are not realistic. Why not have Apple replace the battery? Problem solved.
If the battery had better capacity for him, I would tend to agree, so long as apps and a weak WiFi / cell signal weren’t part of the equation. As it stands, his current battery state does negatively impact his daily usage. Until he negates that magic component, none of us can rightfully say, WatchOS 7 is sorely to blame.I think the point is that it was lasting significantly longer before the update. So regardless of how long it’s been owned or the state of the battery, os7 shouldn’t have impaired its performance like this
But surely the battery state was just as low last week before os7? Good point on all other things being equal between the days before update and the days after (for me and working from home I know my behaviour is the most consistent week on week at the momentIf the battery had better capacity for him, I would tend to agree, so long as apps and a weak WiFi / cell signal weren’t part of the equation. As it stands, his current battery state does negatively impact his daily usage. Until he negates that magic component, none of us can rightfully say, WatchOS 7 is sorely to blame.
After updating to watchOS 7.01 my AW5 drained virtually nothing during the last two hours. Let’s see how things work out the next days.
iOS 14.0.1 / watchOS 7.0.1 seems to have done the trick for me. 4.5 hours into the day and I’m only 4% down. Much better. Fingers crossed that’s it fixed, even though Apple never admitted it.
Yea I check a few more nights with handwashing and it's totally inconsistent. I woke up the next morning with 75%, and then the next dead againI found hand washing didn’t make a difference on my battery wear.
Only thing that worked was unpair/re pair from back up.
Yea out of three mornings, I woke to a dead watch twice and 75%! another. That's a massive swing.I think the point is that it was lasting significantly longer before the update. So regardless of how long it’s been owned or the state of the battery, os7 shouldn’t have impaired its performance like this
Updated to 7.0.1. Down 19% without ANY use. It drops 3% roughly every 15-20 min.
Updated to 7.0.1. Down 19% without ANY use. It drops 3% roughly every 15-20 min.
Updated to 7.0.1. Down 19% without ANY use. It drops 3% roughly every 15-20 min.
I got a new AW series 6 and it the battery was going crazy fast, I turned off "screen always on" and new it's good,,,but I'm disappointed with that because that was the main reason that I upgraded from my series 4