You might consider the 7 or 8 series. That 1 millimeter seems to make the Watch more usable. It will also buy you a couple of years.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
watchOS 10 Described as Apple Watch's Biggest Software Update Since 2015
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I turned my S8 in during the try period and got the Ultra. Have been mostly pleased with it. My vision is not as good as it once was so I can see the larger face much better. I wear it at night to monitor sleep patterns.
Week long battery life, thats all I need. Competition doesnt have access to better hardware, so I guess they curb the features for a longer standby.
The S4 chip (in the Series 4) and S5 chip (in the Series 5 and SE 1) are the same chip, so the most likely scenario is that all three of them are dropped at the same time. Seems likely that they will all get WatchOS 10. Does depend how demanding these new software features are though, perhaps the 1GB of RAM included in the S4/S5 chip will be a limiting factor.
Apple: The Apple Watch is the most accurate timepiece ever, accurate to within 50ms of the global time standard.
Also Apple: We don't bother showing seconds on digital faces.
Yes. Please. Despite being popular products, the Apple Watch and watchOS have needed some attention for a while now. An Apple Watch Series 4 released in 2018 feels very similar in usage and performance to a series 8 aside from the health features and the always on screen. The longevity is nice but it feels like Apple could be doing a lot more.
Some "simple" things I want to see:
1. The eSIM opened up to all carriers (not just the major ones) and the requirement for it be tied to number sharing (or even a phone number) removed as low cost carriers and data only sims would be a great fit for Apple Watch.
2. A more independent Apple Watch that can do more without an iPhone around (this will also require Apple to "encourage" app devs to develop native watchOS apps and quit killing their existing ones)
3. A focus on finding more things the Apple Watch can do better than the iPhone / other devices other than just health. I like the health features but they take time to develop, often require regulatory approval, and often require the purchase of the latest device.
Some "simple" things I want to see:
1. The eSIM opened up to all carriers (not just the major ones) and the requirement for it be tied to number sharing (or even a phone number) removed as low cost carriers and data only sims would be a great fit for Apple Watch.
2. A more independent Apple Watch that can do more without an iPhone around (this will also require Apple to "encourage" app devs to develop native watchOS apps and quit killing their existing ones)
3. A focus on finding more things the Apple Watch can do better than the iPhone / other devices other than just health. I like the health features but they take time to develop, often require regulatory approval, and often require the purchase of the latest device.
Hopefully there will be many new watch faces this year. Major hardware changes might be reserved for the 10th anniversary.
I hope they change the Dock and its button. It was necessary on older hardware (to keep favorite or oft-used apps in memory so they didn’t load so painfully slowly).
Sorry if it’s been mentioned prior but being able to delete Messages by pressing & holding so you can choose multiple (like iOS) would be welcome.
This is my biggest criticism with the Apple Watch OS. I almost always have a scenario when customising my watch where complications I want are available across multiple different Watch faces, but almost never all available for the one watch face with a dial I also like.
Would love there to be more flexibility and if possible a bit more of a decoupling of complications from specific Watch faces, or have alternative sets of the same complication so the same capability can be provided across all Watch faces even if the complication appears a tad different.
There’s a lot more complications they could add still too. A bit ironically for a watch, but complications that show time would be handy to show say a digital clock on a watch face with analogue hands as the main face. Right now there’s not a lot of time based complications.
The problem is that they can’t write code at Apple so I am actually very worried because the more they change the more they will ruin.
It’s already buggy enough with smart reply being dumb, maps not staying open during navigation, the now playing section that keeps defaulting to watch instead of stick on controlling the only device playing (HomePod) and so on.
Imagine after a major revamp what we will get..
Or wait for the new version coming out this September with a updated chipset (Ultra uses same one as S6/S7). The Ultra S2 will probably get a couple of years or more of WatchOS support.
Well, I know I won’t be updating to watchOS 10 right away. I’ll probably wait a couple of months and see what the early adopters have to say.
i hear you.
for steps i just set all apps that count/reflect steps to always use the same number of steps that are found in the apple Health app. in order to have all step related apps use the same info and consistently measure performance across all apps and over time.
for flights of stairs, however, i am struggling to understand where its getting its info.
when i take my iPhone with me, and i am walking up hills or hilly streets, the iPhone reports, for example, 12, but the watch reports only 3. the apple Health app itself uses the iPhone recorded flight count (if of course i take it with me); but of course uses only the watch recorded flight count (if i dont take my iPhone with me).
when i actually calculate the approximate number of meters of elevation change that i have walked the number of meters that i figure is always about the same number of meters in altitude that the watch itself reports. but the number of equivalent flights the watch reports does not equal the international standard (which is the same standard that apple itself reports as being used) of 1 flight of stairs being equal to 3 meters of elevation.
apple reports a way to calibrate between the watch and the iPhone, which i have tried, but it doesn't fix this problem.
for standing, i needed to learn how the watch thinks. when i get out bed in the morning it always picks up that as having stood. but it seems as the day goes on, i need to actually move around more for it to record as a standing hour. it of course never counts only just standing as "standing"; i always need to actually move around quite a bit before it records as having stood, most typically needing some arm movements while moving around.
on the issue of a big software update for the upcoming watchOS 10, im looking forward to it. should be good.
It won't need a camera because an AI will listen to your voice and create a video of you speaking that it streams to your video-conferencing app.
Oh - I forgot to patent that before Apple does...
Oh - I forgot to patent that before Apple does...
My number one wish is that they’ll let you choose to hear your sleep alarm go off on your watch in nightstand mode, rather than your phone.
And even if they dont let us delete them, we should be able to hide apps we dont need
And I hope they let you dial down the settings for how it recognises a flight of stairs as well, because it never records the flight of 15 steps in my house
And even if they dont let us delete them, we should be able to hide apps we dont need
And I hope they let you dial down the settings for how it recognises a flight of stairs as well, because it never records the flight of 15 steps in my house
Last edited: