Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The most transformative actor in the last 20 years is Johnny Depp. From a pirate in P.O.C, playing a mobster in both ‘Public enemies’, and playing Whitey Bulger in ‘Black Mass’, Edward Scissorhands, A vampire, an Indian in the Lone Ranger, ect. He’s done it all. And I think the thing that makes him so unique, is how adaptive he is, all the way from a children’s role perspective to a more sinister character. I think that’s what makes his acting so dynamic.

I actually generally feel bad for him, being his career is on the ruin given his ‘personal drama‘ with another actress, (which I’m not interested in discussing due to PRSI.) What’s interesting about Johnny Depp, he actually doesn’t even watch his own performances on film once they’re actually ready for the final edit cut/public release. Which is interesting, because you think actors Would watch their films to see what they could’ve changed or approachEd differently, But being how he always seems to deliver, shows how natural of an acting he can meet on any level throughout his career.
Not a fan.
 
Next up for me:

SCORE: A Film Music Documentary (2017)​

Hoping this one's better than the trailer, which seemed to be trying to let too many say too much too soon, or something. From reviews the film sounds like it may be similarly hit and miss, but I'll enjoy hearing what a few of the soundtrack composers I've come to admire have to say.

But while watching the trailer I was put in mind of a few movies (not the ones referenced there) in which I had found the soundtrack occasionally intrusive or just ill considered in some scenes. Maybe I'll learn something from this docu about how THAT happens too. I bet there have been some interesting battles over who gets to work a film's magic via the soundtrack and who gets the final word on what rolls out.


This looks interesting, thanks! A really interesting subject at least, hopefully the film lives up to it.

So good, really holds up - er, with the exception of some sketchy train F/X :D Schwarzenegger would've been so painfully wrong, Ford got the everyman, but "the smartest guy at the table" just right. Andreas Katsulas (the one armed man), did a lot of "genre" TV, but famously (from my perspective!) was G'Kar in Babylon 5!



Richard Kimble: "I didn't kill my wife!"

Gerard:
"I dont care!"

Hah, yeah the train sequence is perhaps a bit dodgy by today's standards, but that's a minor quibble in an otherwise excellent film. Also, whenever I see that particular scene with the train, I can't help but think of the Leslie Nielsen classic Wrongfully Accused. You know, the one with the one-armed, -legged and -eyed assassin. Pure gold.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: D.T.
D7EF0548-02B7-4698-A45C-C838D17E9BA4.jpeg

Back To The Future Part 2 (1989)- 85% RTAS. Not as good as the first one, portrayals in the future were corny, situations were improbable although they tied events from the original movie 1955 with this movie’s visit to 1955 nicely. More in the Time Travel thread:


The most transformative actor in the last 20 years is Johnny Depp. From a pirate in P.O.C, playing a mobster in both ‘Public enemies’, and playing Whitey Bulger in ‘Black Mass’, Edward Scissorhands, A vampire, an Indian in the Lone Ranger, ect. He’s done it all. And I think the thing that makes him so unique, is how adaptive he is, all the way from a children’s role perspective to a more sinister character. I think that’s what makes his acting so dynamic.

I actually generally feel bad for him, being his career is on the ruin given his ‘personal drama‘ with another actress, (which I’m not interested in discussing due to PRSI.) What’s interesting about Johnny Depp, he actually doesn’t even watch his own performances on film once they’re actually ready for the final edit cut/public release. Which is interesting, because you think actors Would watch their films to see what they could’ve changed or approachEd differently, But being how he always seems to deliver, shows how natural of an acting he can meet on any level throughout his career.

My feeling is that he got a bit too vested in playing quirky characters, making it hard to go back.
 
@LizKat

Black Mass is excellent. One thing Johnny Depp did really well in that movie, was actually with the voice acting to portray Whitey Bulger. I think it’s one thing to be an actor with mannerisms, body language, but voice acting equally really creates the character identity.

@Huntn

He definitely has played some odd roles over the years, but I think that’s what made him so popular, being he isn’t someone who just committed to ‘action movies‘ like Jason Statham for example. When you look at Johnny Depp‘s career, I think he’s played almost every roll possible in every type of genre of film.

A deeper movie with him is called ‘Transcendence’.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn
@LizKat

Black Mass is excellent. One thing Johnny Depp did really well in that movie, was actually with the voice acting to portray Whitey Bulger. I think it’s one thing to be an actor with mannerisms, body language, but voice acting equally really creates the character identity.

@Huntn

He definitely has played some odd roles over the years, but I think that’s what made him so popular, being he isn’t someone who just committed to ‘action movies‘ like Jason Statham for example. When you look at Johnny Depp‘s career, I think he’s played almost every roll possible in every type of genre of film.

A deeper movie with him is called ‘Transcendence’.
I really can’t picture anyone else as Captain Jack... :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: akash.nu
On my 4th movie today. Watching Faster.



Definitely my favorite movie from Dwayne Johnson. He has very little dialogue throughout the entire movie, but his poise and tenacity to track down the those responsible for killing his brother was awesome. A lot of great scenes, and a nice plot twist towards the end, but the musical score perfect for this film.

Clint Mansell Was behind the musical score for this movie, [I have a few tracks on my Amazon music Prime account]:

B8353561-412F-4105-BA25-5AFB8DC4CA41.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: akash.nu
The Void(2016)
I was in the mood for some B-Movie horror over the weekend, and The Void had good reviews and was sometimes compared to John Carpenter's The Thing, which I kinda-sorta like. The "practical" special effects were great, and the movie delivered the B-movie vibe. But it was a little too ambiguous/abstract and there was a little too much gore IMHO.

The_Void_%282016_film%29.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Queen6
The Void(2016)
I was in the mood for some B-Movie horror over the weekend, and The Void had good reviews and was sometimes compared to John Carpenter's The Thing, which I kinda-sorta like. The "practical" special effects were great, and the movie delivered the B-movie vibe. But it was a little too ambiguous/abstract and there was a little too much gore IMHO.

The_Void_%282016_film%29.png
What do you mean you kinda-sorta like The Thing? It’s a horror movie that deserves all kinds of hugs. 😜
 
What do you mean you kinda-sorta like The Thing? It’s a horror movie that deserves all kinds of hugs. 😜

I mean, i sorta-kinda liked it. Didn't really make a huge impression on me, and i'm not really a fan of all that gore. IMHO
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn
I mean, i sorta-kinda liked it. Didn't really make a huge impression on me, and i'm not really a fan of all that gore. IMHO
What makes a story, in this case the updated story good/excellence is the tension built on uncertainty and suspicion built into the situation. Of interest is that the original story Who Goes there? had it, but The Thing From Another World (1951) glossed over the entire premise until the 1982 John Carpenter new classic, The Thing. I agree it can be horrifying to watching animals/people being transformed into monstrous things and this movie before CGI has superlative practical effects. But I’ll cut you a break on the gore, ie transformations of which there are some. :)




 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeye_a
What makes a story, in this case the updated story good/excellence is the tension built on uncertainty and suspicion built into the situation. Of interest is that the original story Who Goes there? had it, but The Thing From Another World (1951) glossed over the entire premise until the 1982 John Carpenter new classic, The Thing. I agree it can be horrifying to watching animals/people being transformed into monstrous things and this movie before CGI has superlative practical effects. But I’ll cut you a break on the gore, ie transformations of which there are some. :)

I know The Thing gets some great reviews, and i appreciate the practical effects(always). It's just that I watched it a couple of years ago and I don't really remember much from it (I realize, i'm getting old). On the gore stuff.... there's The Fly, which has the goriest of the gore, and I really like that sci-fi horror.
 
I know The Thing gets some great reviews, and i appreciate the practical effects(always). It's just that I watched it a couple of years ago and I don't really remember much from it (I realize, i'm getting old). On the gore stuff.... there's The Fly, which has the goriest of the gore, and I really like that sci-fi horror.

The Fly (1986) in some ways bothered me more than The Thing, actually giving me the heebie jeebies, especially when it puked acid as an attack, GR-OSSS.

4648A4D2-C460-49A6-B98D-4DEFA8C61393.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawkeye_a
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.