Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I really want to see Apple return to being an open-source evangelist like in the founding days of OS X, but sadly it's become more about focusing on their own in-house finished software and hardware products. Sure, it's easy to install the latest open-source libraries to override outdated bundled versions, but it's a missed opportunity to be a leading platform out of the box.
 
  • Like
Reactions: aallord and pappl
Sigh... I've been waiting a long time for a refreshed AirPods Max. USB-C and new colors and literally nothing else would be sad.

Do you own a pair of Max that aren't performing just as well as the day you bought them, or have you been on the fence waiting for the "next" iteration?
 
How confident are they in the February 2024 release date for the Vision Pro? I plan on making the poor financial decision of opening a credit card to take advantage of sign up bonuses, but the bonus only lasts for 3 months.
 
Looking forward to seeing the new OLED iPad Pros along with the larger Air. Will be very interesting to see the upcoming Watch X. Looks like Apple will be launching some very nice devices in 2024
 
Hmmm, when they introduced the M SOC I thought the update cycle of the Macs would improve due to the fact that Apple won't have to wait for Intel anymore... However, it still sucks, iMac had to wait 2 years for example. Other Macs also receive updates very slow.

iMac 914 days
Mac Pro 1273 days
Mac Studio 454 days
Mac Mini 798 days
MBA 13 539 days

Only the MBP's get a regular update. So Apple, get your **** together and make that every Mac gets its update yearly and streamline it so every Mac has the same iteration (Mx) There are 6 line ups so every two months you update one of them. At the end of the year all Macs have the same Mx SOC inside.
Apple is just following where the sales are, desktops are a dying category.
 
Apple is just following where the sales are, desktops are a dying category.
Agreed.

When it comes to the iMac, it used to make sense for additional performance, connectivity (USB/FireWire/Ethernet/SD slots et.c.), storage (large Disk Drives) and cleanliness (no need for plenty of wires).

I think the M1/M3 iMac was a very strange decision by Apple. By simply making it a "MacBook on a stick", they removed all USPs, making it even more of a dying category... I'm guessing their margins are great, so they still make decent money despite the lacking sales, but what a gimped product it is.

- By only offering USB-C ports, it doesn't add any connectivity whatsoever.
- It doesn't add more storage
- It doesn't add more performance
- It doesn't offer a beautiful 27" 5K display anymore (biggest selling point for many was the value proposition)

I think Apple really missed a chance to reinvent the desktop. They could have made it a "home hub" and expanded its use as a family computer, they could have allowed Target Display mode, making it double as a work-from-home hub/nice display for all family members to use. They could have allowed HDMI input to allow gaming consoles to be connected. They could have done something to compete with the Microsoft Studio, e.g. Touch Input and a Swivel arm (think iMac G4), for the creatives out there.

Unfortunately, Apple took the easy way out and focused on profit margins rather than anything else.

It might stick around for educational purposes (Kensington Lock), but it's clearly not going to be a focus product.

Ultimately, I think Apple has decided that the iMacs days are counted.
 
400 or 500,000 vision pros will sell out the first week. So much pent-up demand for this. I hope they let me order online though. Let's go Apple!
 
Hmmm, when they introduced the M SOC I thought the update cycle of the Macs would improve due to the fact that Apple won't have to wait for Intel anymore... However, it still sucks, iMac had to wait 2 years for example. Other Macs also receive updates very slow.

iMac 914 days
Mac Pro 1273 days
Mac Studio 454 days
Mac Mini 798 days
MBA 13 539 days

Only the MBP's get a regular update. So Apple, get your **** together and make that every Mac gets its update yearly and streamline it so every Mac has the same iteration (Mx) There are 6 line ups so every two months you update one of them. At the end of the year all Macs have the same Mx SOC inside.
Only MacBooks are sold frequently enough to guarantee yearly updates. Everything else can wait until there is a more meaningful upgrade or 3nm chips are becoming cheaper. You better get used to the idea of a sustainable economy without constant consumerism. An increment on the year counter is no reason to do anything.
 
an updated MacBook Air, one of, if not THE best selling Mac, is almost guaranteed for an update to M3 this year. How’s it not included? I’d bet my left whatever on an updated MBA over a Mac mini, though both are admittedly likely.
 
Yeah, they missed that given it was discussed in an earlier article.

I do find it hard to believe they will wait until next autumn to address the entry level iPad. That would make the iPad 9 three years old and the 10 would be two years old.
I assumed that the iPad 10 is the new entry-level iPad and will remain so as long as Apple thinks it can get away with it.
 
Took the family to an arcade the other day and there were a couple of VR games. One was a rollercoaster simulator. While it certainly felt cool, each of us experienced dizziness after just a short 5-minute play.

Hope Apple is able to help with that when I get the VisionPro 5 or 6… because there is no way I’m ever shelling out $4,600 (cdn) for this initial model. That cost alone makes me nauseous!
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
Apple is just following where the sales are, desktops are a dying category.
True to a point. I think there remains a market for systems built of separate components as well as AIOs. I’m not alone in generally disliking the laptop configuration even as popular as they are. Just as laptops have cut into desktop sales tablets have cut into laptop sales. Each device satisfy a range of needs, but none of them can satisfy all needs.
Only MacBooks are sold frequently enough to guarantee yearly updates. Everything else can wait until there is a more meaningful upgrade or 3nm chips are becoming cheaper. You better get used to the idea of a sustainable economy without constant consumerism. An increment on the year counter is no reason to do anything.
True. Rarely is there a significant upgrade to these devices to warrant a yearly upgrade. The M-series has jumped about 15% in overall performance with each generational upgrade from M1 to M2 to M3, and yet a device like the M1 MacBook Air, or any M-series device, is still a damn good machine to satisfy mist people’s needs. Indeed the M1 MacBook Air is still one if the best bang-for-buck devices on the market even after three years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect
8GB standard as base RAM across Mac products. That's the only thing you should expect.
It's crazy at this point that if you buy a Mini, MBA or even base MBP, you will be stuck with 8GB RAM in 7 years or even more, if you keep that long the device, which would be logical. That means Apple will keep optimizing MacOS good 8GB RAM until 2030, but by 2025/2026 I'm sure it will become a serious bottleneck for many users, even with basic tasks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.