Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
What would MBA need M3 for? M2 already provides more than enough power than Apple intends for its lower end laptops. The only reason for M3 would be if chip yields are such that M3 chips are less costly than well-evolved M2, which seems unlikely.
It's not about the computer needing the chip; I just meant that it has been rumored here, here, and here, so should be included in this article.

As far as "why put M3 in an MBA?" it's pretty much just good for future-proofing, but why not?

M3 is now in the iMac, which Apple tends to market the same way as the MacBook Air (for everyone, all-in-one, easy to use etc.) so it seems like a natural fit for the laptop once it's already in the desktop.

On top of all that, I'm looking to go from a 13-inch M2 Air to a 15-inch, and would hate to buy a computer with the same, almost-two year old chip just to increase the screen size, when a newer version of the chip exists.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crow_Servo
It would suck if Apple changed the way bands attach to the Apple Watch. Especially for the people who have accumulated a sweet collection of them like myself. Plus, they are not cheap, and selling them the year before at $100 a pop for many styles and then abandoning the system the next year would be significantly crappy.
 
Lame. Can't wait for the new Fire tablets! Let us know what to expect from Apple in 2025, 2026, 2027, and 2028!
 
I am actually quite excited. Once in while, Apple launches class defining products, sometimes successful (iPhone, iPad, iPod, Macs, watches, AppleTV, iWork, iCloud), sometimes not so much (HiFi speakers, smart speakers, Maps), but inevitably they create a new market with all opportunities. Even if Apple doesn't succeed with Vision, that still will be an important step ahead for the company, so let's see how it goes :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crow_Servo
Instead of wanting more, I want less. Specifically, I wish the would stretch out the MacOS and iOS updates. Annual releases are NOT a good thing. An 18 or even 24 month release cycle would be better, and spend the extra time and resources for bug fixes of current releases and reduction of bugs prior to new releases.
I actually agree. Annual releases were important that OSX was young and needed so much refining, but now it is a mature OS which doesn't need annual refreshes with very minor substance. It can be moved to 18-24 month schedule without much difference. Instead, I'd like Apple to focus on resurrecting Aperture (Mirrorless and DSLR markets are up), further improve pro Apps, introduce new Pro apps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
I expect them to stop ripping off customers with 200€/$ upgrade prices for +256GB SSD / +8GB RAM.
16GB RAM / 1TB SSD should be minimum for any premium device.
 
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: Tuck_ and Chuckeee
I am looking forward to replacing my Macs with the visionPro, but I don't even know when this will hit Europe.
 
Agreed.

When it comes to the iMac, it used to make sense for additional performance, connectivity (USB/FireWire/Ethernet/SD slots et.c.), storage (large Disk Drives) and cleanliness (no need for plenty of wires).

I think the M1/M3 iMac was a very strange decision by Apple. By simply making it a "MacBook on a stick", they removed all USPs, making it even more of a dying category... I'm guessing their margins are great, so they still make decent money despite the lacking sales, but what a gimped product it is.

- By only offering USB-C ports, it doesn't add any connectivity whatsoever.
- It doesn't add more storage
- It doesn't add more performance
- It doesn't offer a beautiful 27" 5K display anymore (biggest selling point for many was the value proposition)

I think Apple really missed a chance to reinvent the desktop. They could have made it a "home hub" and expanded its use as a family computer, they could have allowed Target Display mode, making it double as a work-from-home hub/nice display for all family members to use. They could have allowed HDMI input to allow gaming consoles to be connected. They could have done something to compete with the Microsoft Studio, e.g. Touch Input and a Swivel arm (think iMac G4), for the creatives out there.

Unfortunately, Apple took the easy way out and focused on profit margins rather than anything else.

It might stick around for educational purposes (Kensington Lock), but it's clearly not going to be a focus product.

Ultimately, I think Apple has decided that the iMacs days are counted.

@G5isAlive you have something to add?
 
@G5isAlive you have something to add?
Sure. Thanks for the ask.

I guess everyone is entitled to an opinion so you have yours that the iMac should be a Swiss Army knife for everyone’s other devices and I think you don’t know Apple at all if you think Apple has any interest in playing nice outside of their ecosystem (besides business apps). You have a clear idea of what you want for yourself, but ignore that some people just want a Mac, and they want it to work as a Mac. They don’t want to share it with their kids Nintendo that’s probably connected to a larger cheaper screen (tv) already. If they want a hub, they buy a hub. Plenty of those that connect well with USB C. Maybe hubs are just something more to carry with a lap top but they work great with desktops. For every customer they might gain with your more expensive concept of Swiss Army knife they would likely lose more that just want a Mac.

I like the simplicity of the iMac and how it fits well with Apple’s ecosystem. Your concept seems ripe for failure.

But that’s just my opinion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Warped9
It’s not hard to get Apple’s mindset regarded RAM and storage. They reason if you’re willing to pay more for a spec’d device then you might as well just buy the next more powerful model available right off the shelf.

I suspect a lot of those people who will get a built-to-order Mac are likely planning to keep it long term, longer than average. Looked at that way the initial cost doesn’t look so bad given they’re buying one machine as opposed to buying two or three to upgrade over the same time span. And Mac’s have a reputation for lasting generally longer than most PCs.

This is also reflected in tablets. People gripe about the price of iPads compared to Android based tablets, but iPads are generally built studier as well as get more OS upgrades and support. As such they’re expected to last longer.

The old adage still holds: you get what you pay for.
 
If it gives me 3 high resolution monitors in a package the size of my two hands I have a feeling I’ll be using it lots and it’s cheaper too.
Big IF there.

I don't want to sound snarky, not my intention, because I too would snap up an AV Pro IF it offered me that.

However nothing I have yet heard or seen leads me to believe that we will get that with the 1st version.
 
YOU FORGOT M3 MAC SUDIOS.

NO ONE CARES ABOUT THE VISION PRO. 9 TO 5 DID A SURVEY. NO ONE WANTS TO BUY ONE. 16 PERCENT.
TIM COOKS PIPE DREAM.
 
I think the mini 7 is more likely to launch to coincide with the launch of the A18 in September. The A16 is too minor of an upgrade to use, the 17 Pro will most likely be limited to the 15 Pro and 15 Pro Max because of the N3B process being wound down by the middle of next year, so it’s more likely the mini 7 will get the regular A18.
Or it could always launch with a standard A17.
Maybe it doesn’t have the full 8 GB of RAM, a GPU core disabled and a slightly lower clockspeed.
 
We can expect more of the up sell. Kings of the up sell!

We would all love better hardware, more innovation and excitement. But I hope in 2024 Apple starts to take more seriously its environmental commitments and responsibilities.

They have the money and the know how to make hardware that is way more repairable and longer lasting (in terms of software and hardware support). Even if the hardware costs a bit more.. I think they have a huge number of customers that would appreciate it and tolerate price increases for that.

Because despite my love of Apple devices... Im starting to really deplore soldered storage, non user replaceable batteries etc etc
 
  • Love
Reactions: arkitect
I have the A12Z 12.9" iPad Pro w/Magic Keyboard since launch. It's still a great device except for some hiccups for web browsing and short battery life. If the spec looks good in 2024, I may just spend the money on upgrading my iPad Pro over getting a Vision Pro.
 
Big IF there.

I don't want to sound snarky, not my intention, because I too would snap up an AV Pro IF it offered me that.

However nothing I have yet heard or seen leads me to believe that we will get that with the 1st version.
There's lots of footage already floating around showing that it does
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.