Of course. Pot kettle. You seem to be an expert on delusional fanboyism. Personal experience I see.
i'm not dilusional, more realistic than you as soon as you think phones need nvme
That’s not up to you to decide what anyone needs.
Premium iPhone nvme
Premium android- no nvme.
It’s that simple.
So you were wrong it’s ok Admit it.
And back to your cheap hardrive.
again, nvme doesn't make much difference in a computer, much less in a phone, my point from the get go but you time and time again failed to grasp that concept, you can disagree, but at least acknowledge the concept
its that simple, so you were wrong and its ok for you to admit it
Your the one that started comparing your ssd to the iPhone XS Max because there aren’t any android alternatives. This isn’t moving the goal posts your actually moving the subject.
Either prove your hard drive is faster than apples ssd Or move on.
You claimed that you and your friends have iPhones xs didn’t you. Or were you lying.
Get the benchmarks post them or move on.
go back and read how this started, this is the 3rd time i'm repeating myself, you can't be that daft.
No it’s actually illegal and against the law.
But I see your doubling down on.
You either can afford the real thing or you can’t, I have no interest in fakes or copies.
And back to your cheap hard drive again.
again with the ad hominem? your the bozoo thinks iphone nvme is faster than prosumer grade nvme desktop ssd
That’s you right. With the random imgur screenshot.
again, i'm waiting, post screenshots of your iphone nvme speed test,
i'm still waiting
You claimed both you and your friends have the phone, intel modem. Guess you were being dishonest.
Hey it happens copies and counterfeiting are completely fine/s
what part was i dishonest about? i first mention my friends complaint about their xs getting worse coverage than their qualcomm x, then i stated my own experience, they don't contradict but mere compliment.
And which ones are those again?
go back and read, if you can't even do that then you have no business posting here
Back to your cheap hard drive again.
Debunked what?
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/how-is-3d-tlc-nand-more-reliable-than-mlc.2493029/
You seem to be very emotional tied to your hard drive.
GG for quoting from a forum, you really outdone yourself there
gave me crap about pulling from unreliable sources while you quoting from forums, double standard there much?
but ok, i'll play along, according to the links and comments in that forum, i found this.
"Introducing 3D TLC NAND Because of the need to continue down an aggressive cost-curve, TLC (Triple-Level Cell) NAND-based SSDs were introduced in 2012. TLC NAND holds 3-bits of information per cell. This means there is a need to distinguish between 8 voltage levels to decipher the information held, and as such, endurance is reduced even further."
yes 3d nand tlc is comparable to mlc even edges out in endurance, but 3d nand is a method of applying layering, so once 3d-NAND is applied to mlc, which is used in 960 and 970 pro, guess what the performance goes way beyond anything tlc or 3d tlc can match.
https://www.anandtech.com/show/10698/samsung-announces-960-pro-and-960-evo-m2-pcie-ssds
the 960 pro uses mlc 3D-nand,
Samsung 48-layer MLC V-NAND 960 pro
Samsung 48-layer TLC V-NAND 960 evo
also, i'm emotionally attached to the truth, which clearly isn't what your stating here, so lets get back to the topic that caused you to start spewing non sense,
you stated, 960 pro is a cheap drive(a harddrive as you later put it), and that the nvme used in iphone is better.
yes mlc is more reliable than tlc
finally you see the light! there is hope for you yet!