The iPad is awesome for casual activities like browsing. There's no better tool for interactive 3D content like 3D Medical's human anatomy app. Sketching has improved greatly with the Pencil. Yet, I still find that navigation and touch input is too slow for work activities. It's no surprise that Apple resisted the idea of touch-enabled Macs. Touch UI isn't as sexy and capable as what people saw in the Minority Report! It's slow and imprecise.
I find it's perfect for me. When I am walking around in the classroom, iPad in hand, the fluidity of the touchscreen and the intuitiveness of iOS is precisely what allows me to stay as productive as I am, precisely because I don't have to contend with the complexities and idiosyncrasies of a desktop UI. I simply tap on an app icon, and it launches in fullscreen, ready for me to use.
I just completed running a major school event, and my iPad was instrumental for numerous tasks. I filmed my principal giving a speech in front of a green screen and edited the background on my iPad. My colleague filmed some short clips on his iPhone and airdropped them to my iPad, where I edited them using iMovie and Vee. I chaired meetings with my iPad as my key presentation device, with videos running in PIP mode and apps in split-screen view. My iPad is just so light and portable, with long battery life and inbuilt 4G ensures I am never caught dead without internet connection.
Yes, I still have an iMac at home for the heavy lifting, but in school, much of what I do, gets done on an iPad. Because of its touchscreen, mobile OS and other features which you deem as limitations, but which I find to be unique strengths.
In short, I like my iPad precisely because it doesn't try too hard to emulate a traditional PC, which in turn frees it up to shine in its own areas.
As a longtime Apple disciple, it pains me to hear you say that. That's the attitude that Microsoft users have. The Apple creed is supposed to be "It Just Works". If Apple's reputation is to be preserved and deserved, you can't let Apple rest on its laurels by accepting half-baked UX solutions. Unfortunately, for every clever UX detail they deliver (auto-pairing and syncing features come to mind), they neglect a dozen obvious shortcomings (synced iMessages is a big one). Considering Apple's enormous resources, there's no excuse for their belated improvements and wait-and-see strategy.
Um, no. That's the way Apple products have always been - they give you just one way of doing a certain thing, but it's a darn good one. A macbook doesn't come with a stylus or touchscreen, but the trackpad remains second to none, and it remains the best, most uncompromised laptop experience there is. This also means that it can never be anything more, or less, than a conventional laptop.
Apple devices "just work", but only when you allow them to work as Apple intended. It was the case back then, it's no different now.
One might say that Apple's biggest problem is its marketing hyperbole. Their new product keynotes and advertising reaffirm Apple's legendary elegance and capability. In reality, users are voicing their disgust with key features such as Siri. If Apple hadn't portrayed Siri as a clever, responsive voice assistant, users wouldn't be as angry with the reality that Siri's AI is more artificial than it is intelligent. They would have accepted that Siri is a one-or-two trick pony... much like Apple's Text app was compared to a robust wordprocessor.
I suppose it is then ironic that even as we speak, Siri is playing an increasingly dominant role in the way I interact with my iOS devices. I am already using Siri to start quick messages, dictate short-to-medium length responses, look for map locations, perform quick calculations and now, to add new events to my calendar, compose quick emails and set reminders. It's not perfect, but its reliability is much better now, to the point that I am willing to accept a small chance of spectacular fails in exchange for the convenience that it brings.
Notes has also improved dramatically over the past few years, and I have recently gone back to it after a less-than-subpar experience with Bear (notes I created on Bear had issues syncing to my other devices). Say what you will about Notes. It's quick, it's capable, and the OS integration it sports is unmatched, especially on the iPad with iOS 11.
You already know the answer. None work with Apple's closed ecosystem. Yet all are capable of the same tasks and activities. If you can divorce yourself from Apple's content and cloud services, what's left that is exclusive?
The Apple ecosystem is precisely what makes me so productive. Could I make all my devices work seamlessly together if they were a hodgepodge of hardware from different brands and platforms? Sure, but it would be a lot more work, and the process likely won't be as seamless, and that defeats the whole purpose.
For starters, I teach in the classroom with my iPad mirrored to an Apple TV. Sure, I could use an EZ-cast dongle in tandem with an Android tablet, but then I lose access to 4G (part of the drawback of using wifi to connect) and I lose a very capable tablet in the iPad. This in turn has other ramifications, because then I can't use the apple pencil, the 4:3 ratio of the iPad (because my classroom smart board is 4:3 as well), and Android or Windows wouldn't be as fluid or stable as iOS.
I use iCloud to sync my data, from photos to settings to nightly backups. To my knowledge, Android still doesn't offer the latter.
iOS is home to many great apps which isn't available on Android still.
Yes, maybe on paper, your android phone can do the exact same things my iPhone or iPad can, but it can't do those tasks the way I want them done. Apple is able to offer me a unique proposition that no other company can supply - an integrated computing solution which just works right out of the box. They aren't cheap, that much I admit, but I daresay that my Apple devices have more than paid for themselves in the form of greater productivity and fewer problems overall.