Probably a nice monitor, although I really don't like the styling on Dell's LCDs; the bases are unattractive and the wrong shape to set anything on top of, unlike Apple's flat piece of aluminum (even ViewSonic tends to try and make the foot as small as possible or flat enough to put something on). They're also butt-ugly in the back, but then that's not what you're looking at in most cases (though I'd rather see the tail-end of an Apple LCD on a receptionist's desk--it'd be worth the extra cash for the presentation value).
I set up a 2005FPW for a client just last night, and it uses exactly the same hoop-foot arm as this new 24" and Dell's 17" non-wide LCDs. I like the height adjustment (though I'd never actually use it), and I might use the ability to rotate the screen for some old MAME arcade games, but is it just me or does it seem too lightweight to properly support the 20" widescreen? Seemed off balance, so I sort of wonder about this 24". Odd, because the foot on the Apple 20" (which is what I use at home) is smaller, but the monitor feels more stable.
...oh, wait, I know why. It's because Dell puts the power converter inside the monitor instead of in a brick like Apple. Gets something off the floor, but the screen is a full inch or so thicker and runs a lot hotter as a result, and of course it's heavier.
Having better specs than the ACD isn't bad either.... 
