They must be very poor then, considering in the advertisement world Macs are the standard.
Proof?
I like how you insult people for making an informed and intelligent decision as well. Very classy and mature.
I know quite a few that make far more money than nearly all people here at this forum
They choose PCs because, quite simply, PCs can do more and do more for your money.
Heck--even the new Windows ads were made on Macs.
Proof other than some random persons speculation?
all opinion.... not even going to discuss any of that ridiculous argument.
Heh, how is it opinion that 15.4" notebooks are the most popular and sales prove it? Thats not opinion. That is A FACT.
Look at the MacBook and MacBook Pro. You're really telling me people choose the MacBook over the MacBook Pro (as Apple's store stat indicates) because of the size and not the fact that one is $1299 with a DVD writer and the other STARTS at $1,999?
Be realistic here.
I bought the black Macbook as a treat for myself last year. I'd say I am a right minded person considering all the photography and video editing I do.
Photoshop runs every bit as good on Window as it does on OS X.
Video editing on a 13.3" screen on a system that can't really play high definition content? Really?
My Vista partition couldn't handle any of that. (Where did I say something about Vista in OS X? I meant Vista on my Macbook, it's got its own partition of 40GB. Could you point it out so I can fix my post?)
Read your own post and find it
If you bought your MacBook last year that means you have the GMA 950 (according to your profile, 2GHz black MacBook) running on the Napa platform and it only came with 1GB of RAM but you bumped it up to 2GB.
When did you really test Vista? Last year with beta Boot Camp drivers and 1GB of RAM, pre-SP1?
You're also running it on what could be considered "low-end hardware".
If you're satsified with the performance of Leopard, thats good for you. Some of us demand more for our money and more out of our computers.
If the machine runs fine in such a size then I'd say it has managed to achieve a balance of form and function. It doesn't need to be bigger to have 'proper' ventilation.
Yes it does. Have you noticed how hot the case gets? No well designed PC gets that hot under any circumstances.
Apple needs to make sure theres actual air flow in the case and redesign the cooling system to be more efficient.
maybe dying wasn't the best word, but in a world where everything is being indexed by google and google can't index flash since it's basically a video flash sites are showing up less in search results and thus are viewed less often.
Hah, that made me chuckle.
First, how does that even make any sense? As I said, nearly all websites that have video use Flash video. The Flash video on the site is embedded amongst several other things. Theres no reason it can't be indexed by google. And have you ever been to Youtube? Break? CNN? ABC News? Again, embedded Flash files.
Suggesting that sites that use Flash are all entirely Flash and cannot be indexed, and therefore not googled (since EVERYONE uses google apparently), is kind of stupid.
Flash isn't going anywhere. Nearly every video site on the web uses it. More and more are born each day that use Flash video. It's cross platform, it works fantastic on the majority OS of the world. So why does anyone have a reason to switch?
The only site I can think of that does NOT use Flash is Apple.com. But ironically they just made an "official" youtube channel where, you guessed it, a lot of their videos are already uploaded and in the process of being uploaded in Flash form.
This is a lie and you know it. DVDs play just fine, as does flash, even if it uses more resources
Thats not a lie. Not for people who care about QUALITY. Sure, if you want your DVDs to just play and don't care about how bad they look on OS X or GMA 950s, then good for you. But many of us demand better quality. Thats why theres a forum with over half a million members devoted to making DVDs look better. DVD Player in OS X and video playback on Intel GPUs in general just isn't good enough. You get visible compression artifacting, grain that just isn't part of the film print, interlacing artifacting, incorrect colors, etc. If you're happy with that, then good for you. But I feel for the price of a PC I should get the best DVD playback out there. With Windows and modern GPUs (integrated or dedicated) you do.
I'm not trying to start a fight about what OS is better. For my needs I prefer OS X. I'm just trying to balance your trolling out. Why else would you come to a Mac forum and tell everyone that OS X is a bad operating system other than to be a troll?
Because I own a Mac? Like I said before, you should have paid attention to things. I came here when I got my first Mac more than a year and a half ago. I was happy then until the honeymoon was over and the return window was up and the real side of Macs and Mac OS X showed their face.
(a pretty funny part about your statements is you say you like your iPhone, but hate OS X; do you not realize that the iPhone is running OS X?)
Yes I'm well aware of that. When the iPhone was running firmware 1.1.4, it was rock solid. Battery life was fantastic, my calls never dropped, my cellular signal was solid. Then 2.0 came out. Battery life dropped, my calls started dropping, my signal is ridiculously unstable. I can sit there and watch it change from EDGE to GPRS back to EDGE and from 5 bars to 1 back to 5 then to 3 all in the course of 60 seconds without ever moving. In places where I had fantastic signals with no dropped calls or any call problems I now have quality issues and, again, dropped calls. With 2.1 my battery life is no better, apps crash. I have to restart the iPhone every other day, sometimes every day, or it starts to get slow and apps start to crash or won't launch. My signal is still messed up and I still get dropped calls with quality issues.
So my phone running OS X is acting a lot like my computer running OS X!
If Apple doesn't get these problems fixed I'll have no problem selling the iPhone. I know I could at least sell it and get enough to cover the cost of the termination fee. I don't like contracted cellphone service anyway. I did the math one night. For the ~$1800 this iPhone will cost over 2 years (including the cost of the device, and on a shared plan), and considering my usage habits (voice, text, email) I could have had the same SERVICE (not device obviously) for about $600 in the same time period if I had gone prepaid.
As much as I like the iPhone, its not worth the money and the problems are getting to be more of a hassle than any convenience the device itself might bring.
You know whats funny though? Why is it that OS X in the iPhone can use hardware to do things like play video and audio but the desktop version can't? Why is it that the iPhone gets good video hardware (for the device) but the MacBook gets shafted? Why does the Apple TV get a GeForce 7300 but the MacBooks get GPUs that are generations behind that?
PROOF!
Or are you just talking out of your @$$
What? You want me to get my friends to come here and post and talk about the companies they work for? Yeah, I'm sure their bosses would be REALLY happy with that.
I don't think you want to go there with me mosx. And I am not even close to the best of the bunch even on this site to show that the Mac will do circles around Vista or XP in the media/journalism market.
Explain to me how the Mac would be better in that regard. Please do.