Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
loves me some wife.

srf4real said:
:confused: I used to have a reputation... then I got married.:D

having a wife is better than having a reputation. as long as you have the right wife.

really, REALLY, had the wrong one the first time. :( took years/chemicals/kegs to fix.

got the right one the second time! :)
 
Fill in the blank please.

Yes, I am a MR User. I love to post and read forums. I have a low rep.
I dont give a_______ about what other people think of me!

;)
 
Jaffa Cake said:
...
Although I'm sure that I was a 3.7 yesterday, now I'm a 3.6? :confused:

And I just noticed I went from 8.4 to 8.8. I don't get it, I'm a pretty quiet poster, I can't see what I would've done to have my number go up, at least not in the last couple of days? :confused:
 
63dot said:
we should change the rating system and rate people by macworld's mice system...something we all understand

...from one mouse, or none, for a lowly rated poster/member, and five mice for an excellent one


Interesting idea 63dot. :)
 
I think your cool and i'm really drunk at a hall room in heriot watt, drunkeness rules.
 
4JNA said:
having a wife is better than having a reputation. as long as you have the right wife.

really, REALLY, had the wrong one the first time. :( took years/chemicals/kegs to fix.

got the right one the second time! :)
Ouch!

I imagine that it took more than years/chemicals/kegs to fix. At least those that I know who have been through a divorce have stated money. Huge funds for ex-wife and lawyers.

On topic. Wondering about these reps. Strange.
 
sushi said:
...On topic. Wondering about these reps. Strange.
Observations:

*Not counting two self assigned reps and not counting annk’s first issue, there presently are 38 assigned rankings, at least AFAIK.

*If lowest # to highest # = worst rating to best rating, zap2 would have the worst rep, while Samlchi would have the best rep. Conversely, the opposite would be true if lowest # = best rating. Either way that makes no sense. If they're assigned according to alphabet, zelmo’s rating would be lower than zap2’s.

*There are six (6) duplications of the same # ranking: 3.0 – andiwm2003/Lau, 4.1 – Mitthrawnuruodo/zach, 5.1 – bartelby/Technicolor, 8.5 – emw/WildCowboy, 9.0 – Katie ta achoo/lilstewart, 9.1 – ~Shard~/iGary.

Conclusions: None :D

Added: hulugu, Eraserhead, skoker Total: 41
 

Attachments

  • Demi-Reps.gif
    Demi-Reps.gif
    56.8 KB · Views: 87
sushi said:
Ouch!

I imagine that it took more than years/chemicals/kegs to fix. At least those that I know who have been through a divorce have stated money. Huge funds for ex-wife and lawyers.

On topic. Wondering about these reps. Strange.

Don't forget tears. Lots and lots of tears.
 
xsedrinam said:
Observations:

*Not counting two self assigned reps and not counting annk’s first issue, there presently are 38 assigned rankings, at least AFAIK.

*If lowest # to highest # = worst rating to best rating, zap2 would have the worst rep, while Samlchi would have the best rep. Conversely, the opposite would be true if lowest # = best rating. Either way that makes no sense. If they're assigned according to alphabet, zelmo’s rating would be lower than zap2’s.

*There are six (6) duplications of the same # ranking: 3.0 – andiwm2003/Lau, 4.1 – Mitthrawnuruodo/zach, 5.1 – bartelby/Technicolor, 8.5 – emw/WildCowboy, 9.0 – Katie ta achoo/lilstewart, 9.1 – ~Shard~/iGary.

Conclusions: None :D

Doctor Q, stop hijacking xsedrinam's account and posing as him. It's annoying. ;)
 
vniow said:
I don't know what I've done recently to get such a low reputation. If I pissed anyone off I'm sorry. :( I'll do whatever I can to make up for it.
Since when did this little reputation thing start?????:confused: :confused: :confused: :confused: :confused:
 
I don't know when it started, or what it means, but I should qualify for a tar in the next week or so. It'll be interesting to see if a rep gets appended to it.
 
xsedrinam said:
Observations:

*Not counting two self assigned reps and not counting annk’s first issue, there presently are 38 assigned rankings, at least AFAIK.

*If lowest # to highest # = worst rating to best rating, zap2 would have the worst rep, while Samlchi would have the best rep. Conversely, the opposite would be true if lowest # = best rating. Either way that makes no sense. If they're assigned according to alphabet, zelmo’s rating would be lower than zap2’s.

*There are six (6) duplications of the same # ranking: 3.0 – andiwm2003/Lau, 4.1 – Mitthrawnuruodo/zach, 5.1 – bartelby/Technicolor, 8.5 – emw/WildCowboy, 9.0 – Katie ta achoo/lilstewart, 9.1 – ~Shard~/iGary.

Conclusions: None :D


My head hurts after reading that.... ;) :D :)
 
dsnort said:
I don't know when it started, or what it means, but I should qualify for a tar in the next week or so. It'll be interesting to see if a rep gets appended to it.

377 posts, aiming for 500 by the week's end? 25 a day? that's mad jew style spamming :p
 
xsedrinam said:
Observations:

*Not counting two self assigned reps and not counting annk’s first issue, there presently are 38 assigned rankings, at least AFAIK.

*If lowest # to highest # = worst rating to best rating, zap2 would have the worst rep, while Samlchi would have the best rep. Conversely, the opposite would be true if lowest # = best rating. Either way that makes no sense. If they're assigned according to alphabet, zelmo’s rating would be lower than zap2’s.

*There are six (6) duplications of the same # ranking: 3.0 – andiwm2003/Lau, 4.1 – Mitthrawnuruodo/zach, 5.1 – bartelby/Technicolor, 8.5 – emw/WildCowboy, 9.0 – Katie ta achoo/lilstewart, 9.1 – ~Shard~/iGary.

Conclusions: None :D

Added: hulugu Total: 39

Hmmm, it all sounds very interesting...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.