srf4real said:I used to have a reputation... then I got married.
![]()
Jaffa Cake said:...
Although I'm sure that I was a 3.7 yesterday, now I'm a 3.6?![]()
63dot said:we should change the rating system and rate people by macworld's mice system...something we all understand
...from one mouse, or none, for a lowly rated poster/member, and five mice for an excellent one
Ouch!4JNA said:having a wife is better than having a reputation. as long as you have the right wife.
really, REALLY, had the wrong one the first time.took years/chemicals/kegs to fix.
got the right one the second time!![]()
Observations:sushi said:...On topic. Wondering about these reps. Strange.
sushi said:Ouch!
I imagine that it took more than years/chemicals/kegs to fix. At least those that I know who have been through a divorce have stated money. Huge funds for ex-wife and lawyers.
On topic. Wondering about these reps. Strange.
xsedrinam said:Observations:
*Not counting two self assigned reps and not counting annks first issue, there presently are 38 assigned rankings, at least AFAIK.
*If lowest # to highest # = worst rating to best rating, zap2 would have the worst rep, while Samlchi would have the best rep. Conversely, the opposite would be true if lowest # = best rating. Either way that makes no sense. If they're assigned according to alphabet, zelmos rating would be lower than zap2s.
*There are six (6) duplications of the same # ranking: 3.0 andiwm2003/Lau, 4.1 Mitthrawnuruodo/zach, 5.1 bartelby/Technicolor, 8.5 emw/WildCowboy, 9.0 Katie ta achoo/lilstewart, 9.1 ~Shard~/iGary.
Conclusions: None![]()
Abstract said:Doctor Q, stop hijacking xsedrinam's account and posing as him. It's annoying.![]()
Since when did this little reputation thing start?????vniow said:I don't know what I've done recently to get such a low reputation. If I pissed anyone off I'm sorry.I'll do whatever I can to make up for it.
xsedrinam said:Observations:
*Not counting two self assigned reps and not counting annks first issue, there presently are 38 assigned rankings, at least AFAIK.
*If lowest # to highest # = worst rating to best rating, zap2 would have the worst rep, while Samlchi would have the best rep. Conversely, the opposite would be true if lowest # = best rating. Either way that makes no sense. If they're assigned according to alphabet, zelmos rating would be lower than zap2s.
*There are six (6) duplications of the same # ranking: 3.0 andiwm2003/Lau, 4.1 Mitthrawnuruodo/zach, 5.1 bartelby/Technicolor, 8.5 emw/WildCowboy, 9.0 Katie ta achoo/lilstewart, 9.1 ~Shard~/iGary.
Conclusions: None![]()
dsnort said:I don't know when it started, or what it means, but I should qualify for a tar in the next week or so. It'll be interesting to see if a rep gets appended to it.
bigandy said:377 posts, aiming for 500 by the week's end? 25 a day? that's mad jew style spamming![]()
xsedrinam said:Observations:
*Not counting two self assigned reps and not counting annks first issue, there presently are 38 assigned rankings, at least AFAIK.
*If lowest # to highest # = worst rating to best rating, zap2 would have the worst rep, while Samlchi would have the best rep. Conversely, the opposite would be true if lowest # = best rating. Either way that makes no sense. If they're assigned according to alphabet, zelmos rating would be lower than zap2s.
*There are six (6) duplications of the same # ranking: 3.0 andiwm2003/Lau, 4.1 Mitthrawnuruodo/zach, 5.1 bartelby/Technicolor, 8.5 emw/WildCowboy, 9.0 Katie ta achoo/lilstewart, 9.1 ~Shard~/iGary.
Conclusions: None
Added: hulugu Total: 39
No it doesn't! Stop it now!Eraserhead said:Hmmm, it all sounds very interesting...
That isn't spam, it is verbal vomit or textual torture.bigandy said:377 posts, aiming for 500 by the week's end? 25 a day? that's mad jew style spamming![]()
How can you hear (read) anything when you are posting so much!mad jew said:I don't think I've ever heard that before.![]()