Except its costing 1k for 64gb!$1K is what my 256 7 Plus cost me so no I don't have an issue with paying that. plus with the carrier payments only around 40 per month its not that bad.
Except its costing 1k for 64gb!$1K is what my 256 7 Plus cost me so no I don't have an issue with paying that. plus with the carrier payments only around 40 per month its not that bad.
There is always going to be some kind of hype for a new iPhone. If the rumors are true about the iPhone 8, and apple brings some nice UI for the bezel less screen. I am definitely going to buy the top model.I'll pay this for next year's plus model.. not paying it for this year's hype train.
Except its costing 1k for 64gb!
$1K is what my 256 7 Plus cost me so no I don't have an issue with paying that. plus with the carrier payments only around 40 per month its not that bad.
I can see the iPhone 8 being a bit of a flop in the UK due to our current weak pound. It's going to have to be well over £1000 to be relative to other countries and I can't see that being at all popular. To be honest I think all phones are going to hit a struggle here in the next few months.
There are a lot of people here and on other tech sites saying they won't pay that much so I wouldn't assume everybody is going to change their mind once they see the phone. You might be happy paying however much it may be, but not everybody is as enthusiastic. Whenever I've mentioned the rumoured price to family, friends and colleagues, the reaction has mostly be a chuckle and a denial that the cost is realistic. I think the 7S will be the most popular and will prop up the potentially impressive profits Apple will get. I doubt we'll see a breakdown for how many units that are sold, much like the Apple Watch.
I can't remember this much fuss being made in the past over iPhone pricing. Times have changed and the smartphone market is full of healthy options.
It'll depend what the carriers decide to do in regards to deals on contract. The vast majority of people do not buy handsets outright due to it being such a large initial payment. People like to spread it over 24 months but this is where the carriers got greedy last time. It's part of the reason the iPhone 7 sold so poorly in my country last year.
I know EUR is worth more than USD, so why the Note 8 is 960 USD, but 999 EUR? Shouldn't it be 815 EUR?
1) Europeans spend more money on smartphones.I know EUR is worth more than USD, so why the Note 8 is 960 USD, but 999 EUR? Shouldn't it be 815 EUR?
I could be wrong. But the 999€ is with taxes. And the 960$ is without taxes, because a lot of states have different taxrates, so they mention the price without taxes.I know EUR is worth more than USD, so why the Note 8 is 960 USD, but 999 EUR? Shouldn't it be 815 EUR?
So 999$ for the base 64gb iPhone 8. So it will probably be 1099$ for the 256gb iPhone 8. And 1299$ for the top 512gb iPhone. I say this because for the iPad pro the jump from 256gb to 512gb is 200$. Shut up and take my kidney!!
For iPad Pro, upgrade pricing is as follows:I highly doubt they're going to give you 192GB for for only $100. I'm going to say that they're going to charge $150 extra for 256 and maybe another $200-300 for the 512.
I am not spending a possible rent check type all at once or over the course of 24 months.
that's why a lot of Americans are using the 24 (or 12?) months plan. Pay about $40 a month instead the full $1000 in one time.
For some psychological reason(s) people think its not that much anymore.
Apple doing some nice marketing 101 there!
(but a very smart move by Apple ofcourse..)
Have you seen this article on the BBC? Seems like us Brits are beginning to think twice about upgrading our smartphones to the latest models.
Arguably, the ROI is becoming less and less as mCPU manufacturers have less and less speed bumps due to hitting the theoretical walls of processor development, specifically in the mobile sphere. Too fast causes excessive heat and battery usage. I feel this is where Apple has a leg up on Android. The apps under iOS are more refined and streamlined in the back end, thus they perform very well on a three year old iPhone, where a mid-range $300 Android from that time would suffer if the same app was available on the Google store. I feel that Android needs a Renaissance Period of code refinement to be faster. Can't keep chucking RAM and faster multi-core processors at a problem and expect them to go away.I hadn't seen that article, thanks for sharing. It backs up my personal experiences too with what many of the people I know have been saying.
I doubt many people here will believe it though.