Nexus devices are a different story. You'll get support direct from Google and the phones typically have a great design.
Is Google's hardware support any better than their software support? Because their software support truly sucks.
Nexus devices are a different story. You'll get support direct from Google and the phones typically have a great design.
No, its not caught up.
And Ill give you an example.
Click on 4K resolution, full screen it, and go to the 11:00 mark where the guy is trying to browse the web. He tries to not make it obvious cuz he is super biased, but look at the way the pinch zoom responds on iOS and look at the hesitation on Android. Then he has trouble clicking the link.
Its the same concept with Mac trackpads vs Windows trackpads.
They just don't look and act as smooth, not as rich.
YouTube: video
And thats assuming its the beginning of your OS lifecycle. In 6 months who knows how it will behave after you fill it up and the file system gets slow.
No, its not caught up.
And Ill give you an example.
Click on 4K resolution, full screen it, and go to the 11:00 mark where the guy is trying to browse the web. He tries to not make it obvious cuz he is super biased, but look at the way the pinch zoom responds on iOS and look at the hesitation on Android. Then he has trouble clicking the link.
Its the same concept with Mac trackpads vs Windows trackpads.
They just don't look and act as smooth, not as rich.
YouTube: video
And thats assuming its the beginning of your OS lifecycle. In 6 months who knows how it will behave after you fill it up and the file system gets slow.
Is Google's hardware support any better than their software support? Because their software support truly sucks.
Proving your point by linking a video of a year old Android phone with the newest Android OS compared to a new iPhone running the newest iOS isn't exactly unbiased.
Android doesn't just fill up and get slow any more. It fully supports TRIM. So you can scratch that one off the list.
----------
Not for Nexus devices it doesn't.
Even Google apps on iOS embarrass Apple in what they are trying to do lately.
Google Maps > Maps
Google Now > Siri
I have an iPhone 6 but under no illusions as to who is putting out better software right now.
No, its not caught up.
And Ill give you an example.
Click on 4K resolution, full screen it, and go to the 11:00 mark where the guy is trying to browse the web. He tries to not make it obvious cuz he is super biased, but look at the way the pinch zoom responds on iOS and look at the hesitation on Android. Then he has trouble clicking the link.
Its the same concept with Mac trackpads vs Windows trackpads.
They just don't look and act as smooth, not as rich.
YouTube: video
And thats assuming its the beginning of your OS lifecycle. In 6 months who knows how it will behave after you fill it up and the file system gets slow.
No its just pointing out the same symptoms. We are looking for the same old signs of response latency in the programming and I'm sure the difference wouldn't be made by throwing more specs at the problem.
Its not a horsepower issue, that phone has enough power to have a smooth pinch zoom, its just not designed in the code.
Even the 3GS iPhone was powerful enough to make smooth animations on a raw graphics processing level. But thats because the OS was and is designed smarter with a priority on a low latency, high resolution OS navigation system.
On Android its just not enough of a priority and it STILL hasn't caught up. The symptoms persist even in Lollipop despite the fact they advertised that they did something new and built it from the ground up. Maybe its just impossible to make a smooth open source navigation system!
Either you have open compatibility with any and all garbage or you have smooth OS behavior.
As of 2014 no engineers have been able to make both happen at the same time.
Apple can do it, but only by keeping a closed system.
Android has an open system, but can't control what happens enough to keep it smooth and tight with the proper priority given to CPU cycles that run the navigation system of the OS vs everything else that happens.
Id be curious if Apple created feature parity and openness that was as open as Android but could still maintain priority to GUI and make it solid battery life as well.
Like is it a lack of know how by anyone other than Apple? Or is it an actually logistical barrier of programming principles and the limits of CPU instructions and the balance of that priority in an open system vs a closed one.
Are Google engineers just stupid, or do they have a real logistical limitation due to the open and sloppy fragmented nature of the system and sea of various hardware that they have to support which is why they haven't been able to overcome this issue for half a decade?
----------
Trim came out a long time ago. The symptom stands as of today in the post-trim era.
The problem isn't just re-writing cells. There are various factors that cause bloat.
The fact is, just like Windows, if you redo a fresh install after a year of using it, it will run faster for awhile as a brand new install. And then get sluggish as you install things. And it runs better if you don't install things.
With the iOS and Mac, as long as the hardware is not too outdated it will never change or benefit you to reinstall the OS.
iOS UI = better than Android (my opinion). Android has been playing catchup to iOS in terms of UI. If you'd prefer to move to Android though then do so. iOS is doing fine and the far superior platform for me.
Also, Google voice search is NOT better than Siri. It's better at search based stuff but Siri is a virtual assistant. It has a completely different purpose. Also, Google Now is something completely different. It's that card based thing, not the voice search.
The only one I would agree with is Google Maps > Apple Maps but even then only by a small margin. Google Maps isn't always accurate either.
I recently came from Android to iOS when I got an iPhone 6 and I can assure you iOS isn't in any trouble. To the right market, it's the superior platform.
No, its not caught up.
And Ill give you an example.
Click on 4K resolution, full screen it, and go to the 11:00 mark where the guy is trying to browse the web. He tries to not make it obvious cuz he is super biased, but look at the way the pinch zoom responds on iOS and look at the hesitation on Android. Then he has trouble clicking the link.
Its the same concept with Mac trackpads vs Windows trackpads.
They just don't look and act as smooth, not as rich.
YouTube: video
And thats assuming its the beginning of your OS lifecycle. In 6 months who knows how it will behave after you fill it up and the file system gets slow.
Proving your point by linking a video of a year old Android phone with the newest Android OS compared to a new iPhone running the newest iOS isn't exactly unbiased.
All major apps look the same on both platforms. You have no idea what you are saying.
what does it matter if it is a year old phone? it has a Quad core processor clocked at 2.3 ghz , and also has double the RAM of the i6, and it still can't perform better?
dude, no matter what you say , iOS is still more consistent with frame rate and GPU performance, running developer Lollipop on my Nexus 5 and it has crashed the chrome browser on a few websites, and on some websites the pinch lag is pretty bad... Lollipop is quite close to UI frame rate and consistency as iOS though, its defitnetly better then KitKat but not 100% still
and dude, iPhones are notorious for not ever really slowing down over the course of the device lifespan (unless you have owned the device for a few years and its on its last software support then that is understandable) but in their first 2 years or so, iPhones dont get slowed down, the file system doesnt slow the phone down really at all, my old i5 laying around that is on iOS 8.1 is essentially just asfast as it was 2 years ago. (actually even faster in certain applications like Safari, etc) this is nonsense.
...allow USB host/drive.
Yes Apple's is the superior platform. But do you feel Android has started to *look* better aesthetically with Lollipop?
Uhhhh. Yes
Uhhhh....yes...you are just rude.No it doesn't you moron.
Having both, they are not. Now **** and gtfo.
Please ask the one who said "uhhhh...no" to prove first since that started my response. You don't want to be hypocrite? Or do you?Prove it.
They are NOT the same.