I'm not the hunter this time![]()
not arguing that. I was just pointing out that saying stuff like that gets baddies attention assuming you are not a baddie.
I'm not the hunter this time![]()
I switch my vote to Plutonius.
My reasons:
- he voted for philbeeney, but once he posted Plutonius changed his vote to MBP within an hour or two.
- once MBP posted his explanation for being less vocal, Plutonius did not change his vote in the same manner as above
- the next logical person to have voted for according to his promise before the game would have been renewed...
Couple possible reasons for this that I can think of:
- I voted for renewed, thus fulfilling Plutonius' promise for him (which worked by the way)... fair enough.
- he saw that momentum had begun to build against MBP and decided to stick with his vote for MBP... but why?
Figured I would point this out but you saying something like that in the simple game is what got you killed. We figured it it meant you were the hunter and removing the hunter means it was easier to kill everyone else.
so, the same strategy that mexbearpig is using. seems to be working all right for him![]()
I don't necessarily disagree with your assessment re:Mexbearpig. But not everyone approaches this game in the same way... I just thought it odd that you promised to target inactive players, and when the next most inactive player became available (renewed), you didn't move on to him like you did to Mexbearpig. And the cascade of votes that followed your own piqued my interest.I saw a large difference between the two. Philbeeney responded to my narrative with a somewhat thought out reply. This indicated to me that even if he will not originate many post, he will at least respond in a thoughtful way. Mexbearpig still refuses to respond to my other narrative even though I posted some one line replies that he could use. The only responses he had were the generic "I'm a villager" responses. To me, it looks like he still will not post anything unless he's in danger of being lynched. If he had responded to my narratives or at least looked like he was going to try taking a more active role, I would have at the very least withdrawn my vote.
As far as Renewed, he was the only one that had not responded so I thought he might be the priest. As "Don't Panic" stated, one of the other players could be the priest and not want to announce it. I still thought it more likely that Renewed was the priest and that he didn't look at the game yet.
I don't necessarily disagree with your assessment re:Mexbearpig. But not everyone approaches this game in the same way... I just thought it odd that you promised to target inactive players, and when the next most inactive player became available (renewed), you didn't move on to him like you did to Mexbearpig. And the cascade of votes that followed your own piqued my interest.
You may be correct that Mexbearpig is trying to hide something.
But if you are not, that could presumably mean that we have a WW (singular, because I think the savvy WW would split their votes if at all possible in the first round) voting against MBP right now... might be a good place to start for the Priest's question next round, perhaps.
Rodimus Prime said:I am going to do a massive happy dance for getting a wolf on the first day with out priest help. Woo hoo.
I am going to do a massive happy dance for getting a wolf on the first day with out priest help. Woo hoo.
Should we assume that someone was infected? He may not have even known that he would have a majority before it was too late.We don' need no stinkin' priest.
Seriously though, 2 games in a row, werewolf on day 1? That's crazy. As for the priest, we lost one werewolf, but likely gained another and/or gained a vamp. So the list should still stay at 3-4 people if we're wanting to clear people.
Or, we could look at some of the people who changed their (vote) TO Mexbearpig once it became semi-obvious that he was going to get lynched. Let's not forget that as a plausible scenario.Wow!!! I really can't believe it. He should have at least done a better job defending himself.
I think that we should look at people who voted for MBP, and then switched their votes as he started to gain a majority. Especially look out for half-baked cases accompanied by a vote change.
Should we assume that someone was infected? He may not have even known that he would have a majority before it was too late.
most definitively we should assume there are two more wolves now.
In a way, it is like if we lynched a villager and the alpha lost the infection weapon. a huge bonus for the village.
the chances that the infection failed are not that high, because the hunter haven't protected anyone yet and for sure there is still only one vamp, so the infection could only fail if the priest, the vamp or one of the two hunters were attacked (4/18=22% fail rate). and if the apprentice was attacked, he/she lost his/her one immunity.
Remember, the Apprentice has no immunity whatsoever to attacks or infections. The OP clearly reflects this.
Google cache of the OP before today's edits
I think that it might be likely that the alpha infected Ravenvii asap. He somewhat popular around here.
It also make ssense with what was said above.
BTW, It's only night 1