Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
[WW] - The Game of Thrones - GAME OVER - LOYALS WIN
- Thread starter chrmjenkins
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I always strive to have interesting narratives. The scope of this game will be rather focused as I'm trying to minimize the involvement of canon characters (though we'll see some). It also helps me keep it to two factions rather than 4 or 5 as the books have.
Depending on the number of people interested, a third faction might be a good thing. Vampires/wolves/villagers type game.
I will do my best to avoid it
I prefer running two faction games. I think ravenvii did a lot of neat stuff to nuance the roles last game that provided enough scenarios where even a two faction game wasn't straight-forward.
Welcome! I have a high standard with so many GoT fans to please
At this rate, we're probably going to get another Traitor and maybe the NW back. How about a Traitor that appears good to 1 MoW scan and a Maester to revive a player? Hmmm.
Will I be at a disadvantage having never watched Game of Thrones?
No. The setting is only for narrative purposes.
Will I be at a disadvantage having never watched Game of Thrones?
Oh good. Although I know Eva Green starred in GoT, and yes, yes I would (mainly from when she played Vesper Lynd in Casino Royale).
Oh good. Although I know Eva Green starred in GoT, and yes, yes I would (mainly from when she played Vesper Lynd in Casino Royale).
She was in Camelot, which GoT poached a few actors from, but not her.
Whoops.
I knew it was some sort of historic Arthurian style program but that's what happens when you don't have a passing interest in popular TV culture.
I'll shut up now.
Welcome! I have a high standard with so many GoT fans to please
I'm sure you'll be great. I'm not worried.
Are you planning to stick around this time? We have peasants to control.
I don't have a passing interest in popular tv culture either; I read the books many years ago. It kind of ups the ante for chrmjenkins as I will be comparing his narration to the books vs the drivel that passes for tv scripts.
You're in if you want in.
This happened. I invited all of the old regulars that hadn't been banned, left, or turned PMs off. 6 people from those PMs that didn't play last game popped in. And so here we are
Attachments
Last edited:
He said he's just watching. We're up to 20 now. 21 if ScepticalScribe drops in tonight.
If we are going to have 21 (or more) I should probably open it up to a vote. Do people want 2 or 3 factions? I prefer 2, but it can get a little unwieldy with huge rosters. Right now my plan is (at 21) to re-implement the night's watch (and put the specialist role back on them) and add a fifth Traitor that is immune to 1 MoW scan (and can PM from the start).
A good WW/total ratio is usually about 1/4. 5/21 would put us close. Even with adding 2 NW back, we'd be nowhere near an open-source danger scenario.
Twietee, It looks like victim number 2 has arrived
. You loyalist have no chance .----------
Two factions please. Also, don't add to the number of specialist.
Well, here's a list of how each side would get more powerful.
Loyals
--------
5 more villagers
1 "Faceless Man" who sees all the targets of "good" actions
Traitors
--------
1 more traitor immune to 1 MoW scan
Goth/Bought Man gets an extra scan on night 1
"Kamikaze" can happen twice. (maybe I should add a third *evil*)
Are you planning to stick around this time? We have peasants to control.
That depends on this game's hunter. Seems like I'm often the hunter's favorite target in these games.