Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
[WW] - The Game of Thrones - GAME OVER - LOYALS WIN
- Thread starter chrmjenkins
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
There was no autopsy on SilentPanda. Just that SP is dead. So that means that the handmaidens are dead. And likely SP was one of them.
Good point Fenris! That almost confirms QoS, unless someone steps forward and accuses her of imposing.
Still don't see the point in claiming to be the Maester though. It'd be as claiming to be a peasant = not helping much.
----------
No, we only get info's on lynches - that's why I was (and still am) confused why it was mentioned that ss was a Traitor.
Still don't see the point in claiming to be the Maester though. It'd be as claiming to be a peasant = not helping much.
----------
No, we only get info's on lynches - that's why I was (and still am) confused why it was mentioned that ss was a Traitor.
Don't you know that it is impolite to answer a question with a question?
Day 1 "jav6454, a traitor, is dead."
Night 1 "Don't Panic lay dead, killed by traitors."
Day 2 "Plutnoius has been killed and was a loyal. It is now NIGHT 2"
Night 2 "The loyal Tomorrow has been killed by traitors."
Day 3 "philbeeney, a loyal, has died. It is now night 3."
Night 3 No killings.
Day 4 "costabunny, a loyal, has been sent to a skycell to die. It is now NIGHT 4."
Night 4 "DAY 5 has come and scepticalscribe lies dead, a traitor."
Day 5 "Night has fallen and jimN has been murdered by fellow loyals. It is now night 5."
Night 5 "It is now Day 6 and SilentPanda is dead."
Night 1 "Don't Panic lay dead, killed by traitors."
Day 2 "Plutnoius has been killed and was a loyal. It is now NIGHT 2"
Night 2 "The loyal Tomorrow has been killed by traitors."
Day 3 "philbeeney, a loyal, has died. It is now night 3."
Night 3 No killings.
Day 4 "costabunny, a loyal, has been sent to a skycell to die. It is now NIGHT 4."
Night 4 "DAY 5 has come and scepticalscribe lies dead, a traitor."
Day 5 "Night has fallen and jimN has been murdered by fellow loyals. It is now night 5."
Night 5 "It is now Day 6 and SilentPanda is dead."
Last edited:
you and comeagain? have been super quiet, comeagain? claims to be super busy and legit...if he were a traitor i really think he would be atleast voting?
ucfgrad93
unless you have some good proof you arent sir.
I think that's probably a narrative thing. There's no need to point out in the narrative that the murdered was a loyal as its assumed they are. The one time they were a traitor it was pointed out. The updates to the first post each time indicate loyal or traitor. DP/Tomorrow/SilentPanda all show the traitors murdered a loyal. I assume it wouldn't say loyal or traitor if we'd lost the handmaidens and weren't getting autopsies.
Doesn't work as we got the autopsy for the person we lynched on both day 3 and day 4. We'd have missed one of those if the bought man had taken over. Also it requires that costabunny allowed us to lynch him whilst being a handmaiden.
I think you're right but it still confuses me. I see those infos not as part of the narration though. It was also a huge advantage for us to know that ss was killed a Traitor. I think the Traitors would agree
Since the SilentSister was dead already we wouldn't have been as sure as we were. Also, what happens if the Traitors pull an immense stunt and kill one of themselves? Would we get notice it was a Traitor killed at night? I'm not complaining, just trying to explain why this confuses me.Don't understand roric's list at all. I.e. Day 1 we got notice that Jav was a Traitor. Don't Panic was killed during Night1 thus no info, same with Tomorrow.
OK, I guess.
----------
Sorry about my list. I went back and added the nights to it and realized i had the wrong cycle of night/day. The list is correct now.
Don't incur the wrath of the GG!
----------
Only way I can make Roric's list from the narratives not be inconsistent is if the Silent Sister was providing night time traitor kill autopsies (hence nothing in the narrative for DPs death) which the Bought Man took over like he would for handmaidens and the Bought Man was killed yesterday (i.e. jimN was the Bought Man). But I think that's reading too much into it especially since the first post has been updated with loyal/traitor each time.
The OP lines out all role autopsies, regardless of whether narrative ending made them clear.
So it seems we're all agreed as to ucfgrad93 and comeagain being amongst the most suspicious. I'd be interested to know why you think Koodauw more suspicous and rick less so as I have those two the other way around on my list. For the moment think I'm going to vote comeagain so we have ucfgrad93 and comeagain tied.
----------
Twietee - I swear if you keep on editing posts whilst I'm quoting them I'm gonna lynch you just to put a stop to it!
Lords and Ladies, only 13 of us remain. I vehemently hope that number is unlucky for the traitors among us and one of them dies today. A majority of 7 is required to hasten their death.
Potential Traitors
comeagain?: 2 FenrisMoonlight, ucfgrad93
ucfgrad93: 1 rick snagwell
Koodauw: 1 twietee
Yet to vote: Comeagain?, WoodNUFC, Roric, Moyank24, ravenvii, Sythas, Queen of Spades, Koodauw, Scepticalscribe,
Accusations
Post 1032 rick snagwell accused ucfgrad93
Post 1043 twietee accused Koodauw
Post 1044 FenrisMoonlight accused comeagain?
Post 1045 ucfgrad93 accused comeagain?
FenrisMoonlight - Squire in service to the King's Justice
Potential Traitors
comeagain?: 2 FenrisMoonlight, ucfgrad93
ucfgrad93: 1 rick snagwell
Koodauw: 1 twietee
Yet to vote: Comeagain?, WoodNUFC, Roric, Moyank24, ravenvii, Sythas, Queen of Spades, Koodauw, Scepticalscribe,
Accusations
Post 1032 rick snagwell accused ucfgrad93
Post 1043 twietee accused Koodauw
Post 1044 FenrisMoonlight accused comeagain?
Post 1045 ucfgrad93 accused comeagain?
FenrisMoonlight - Squire in service to the King's Justice
So it seems we're all agreed as to ucfgrad93 and comeagain being amongst the most suspicious. I'd be interested to know why you think Koodauw more suspicous and rick less so as I have those two the other way around on my list. For the moment think I'm going to vote comeagain so we have ucfgrad93 and comeagain tied.
----------
Twietee - I swear if you keep on editing posts whilst I'm quoting them I'm gonna lynch you just to put a stop to it!
Prove it!
Koodauw switched his game half way imho. Rick playes like a rock, always the same, each single game. He also always voted for players I found suspicious too. I would switch to Ucf but didn't want to start a bandwagon again.
Koodauw also fits the mold of a vet who knows who to take out. He was really quiet early on, went along with others' suspicions a few times and then was Captain Hindsight after the fact. He hasn't really taken a stand on anything.
He claimed innocence, so I looked elsewhere at the time, but I'm fairly sure everyone on that short list is going to be saying they're loyals at this point.
I'm still doing some thread research, so I'm not quite ready to bold yet.
He claimed innocence, so I looked elsewhere at the time, but I'm fairly sure everyone on that short list is going to be saying they're loyals at this point.
I'm still doing some thread research, so I'm not quite ready to bold yet.
Prove it!
Koodauw switched his game half way imho. Rick playes like a rock, always the same, each single game. He also always voted for players I found suspicious too. I would switch to Ucf but didn't want to start a bandwagon again.
Twietee just because it gives us a 4 way tie and I want to see how some of the lurkers vote when lives are on the line.
Koodauw is on my less suspicious list due to his apparent not knowing which traitors can talk to who making me think he's unlikely to be the dirk, sneak or Lord In Waiting. Of course he could still be Red Man, Bought Man or the whole post be a ploy to make him look less suspicous.
Oh and before anyone says voting for Twietee is suspicious. It's a joke because he said 'prove it'. Other than that its Kinda like a no vote to give us a current tie amongst people we find suspicious.
Last edited:
I'm not going to vote for UFCgrad, simply because I'm not convinced of his suspicious activity. And I don't think inactivity is a good sign of who is loyal or not. Not when you're playing a numbers game, where every loyal counts.