G.Kirby said:I hope this makes it easier to port more games to Mac. If this is the case this will be great for Apple. Bring on the heavy hitting titles, Half Life 3, UT 2006 etc.![]()
cube said:Forget it. They will be programmed against Microsoft APIs, not OpenGL.
themacman said:think how amazing the ps3 is when it comes out december 2006!
It's even more ironic they used PowerMacs to design and test their system.Jmitch said:Isn't it ironic how Gates' decides to use the same processor already implemented into the PowerMac G5?
I'm with you, loved my DC, but Sony had marketing - and EA SportsHector said:knowing sony it will be underpowered and **** just like the ps2 was compared to the dreamcast way after it was released.
Lacero said:Price hasn't been set yet, but I believe the prices will be $399 or $449 at least. This is a product for those who already own an old game console and are looking to upgrade. $299 is just way too low for this sort of graphics powerhouse. Microsoft owns the PPC chip design so costs would be lower, but not by much.
Yet some people have paid $600 for an MP3 player.BenRoethig said:Nobody is going to pay $400 for a game console.
Blackheart said:My guess is that these are pre-specifications.
Console Specs
Hmmm... probably NOT. Seeing that Virginia Tech (2200 G5's) does about 10 teraflops...
Take notice of the footnote though:
nsjoker said:after reading several forums i noticed the topic of using the 360 as a general purpose pc comes up a lot. sorry guys but it's not happening. microsoft will subsidize the machine losing money on each $299 xbox 360 unit they sell, but they hope to gain it back in the future through the games and xbox live service.
if people used it as a pc, microsoft would never get their money back, so you can rest assured microsoft has made it a point to make this thing damn near impossible to mod or crack.
a 9.6 ghz pc w/ 512 ram and that ati card for only $299 is too good to be true.![]()
aussie_geek said:Well done!!
I thought the claim of 1 Teraflop was a bit sus... Fair enough they are using IBM chips and a dedicated system architecture, but this claim has to be fake. If this 1 Teraflop is truethere will be a whole lot of people wanting these things for reasons other than gaming
. And considering the price of the 'box' .. peh....
I own an xbox and I would be willing to buy a '360 if there is confirmed backwards software compatibility. Has anyone been able to find some concrete evidence the '360 will have this feature. I have googled for 20 mins and have only found rumors and speculation....![]()
aussie_geek
I can see GLpraxis rolling his eyes now.aussie_geek said:If this 1 Teraflop is truethere will be a whole lot of people wanting these things for reasons other than gaming
.
Object-X said:Someone will have Linux running on it in within a month. You'll see. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see an OS X hack. Oh, the irony.
not really seeing as they had windows NT for powerpc before, I don't think its that far fetched to see MS use powerpc again.Jmitch said:Isn't it ironic how Gates' decides to use the same processor already implemented into the PowerMac G5?
As long as you don't mind playing games with your thumbsDr. Dastardly said:Well looks like I have no excuse now to keep my PC.![]()
lordmac said:Ya i just saw the mtv thing and wow talk
And miss out on an entire year of kick-ass game play? You, mon ami, is not a hard-core gamer.SiliconAddict said:I personally am going to wait until next year and see what Sony and Nintendo come out with.
shadowguy said:Nintendos Revolution is rumored to run on a custom 4 core G5 running at 2.5Ghz each.
Xbox 360 is supposed to run with the R500 video card, while the Revolution is supposed to be running an R520. The Revolution will be a lot better, power wise, than the Xbox 360.
Lacero said:It's even more ironic they used PowerMacs to design and test their system.