Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Detachable faceplates is a cool idea. I'd like a gun-metal finish for mine. :D
 
G.Kirby said:
I hope this makes it easier to port more games to Mac. If this is the case this will be great for Apple. Bring on the heavy hitting titles, Half Life 3, UT 2006 etc. :D

Forget it. They will be programmed against Microsoft APIs, not OpenGL.
 
themacman said:
think how amazing the ps3 is when it comes out december 2006!

knowing sony it will be underpowered and **** just like the ps2 was compared to the dreamcast way after it was released.
 
before anyone shout : UNDERPOWER some of you need to read this :

Xbox spec for techies

The ATI GPU R500 in the xbox is way ahead of what is available on PC right now. Some of those technologies won't be available until 2006. One thing that pop-ups is the Unified shader architecture. This is a huge feature of the GPU. This is what will drive the nex-gen quality of X360. The fact that you can attributes and changes on the fly pipeline to vertex of pixel shaders depending on the scene is something that no GPU is doing right now.

The chances that PS3 will have a bit more raw power is certainly plausible but I do believe that ATI GPU will be superior to Nvidia GPU.
 
I'll stay with Sony. I have confidence in the Cell Processor. Tho it is nice to hear that the PowerPC has passed 3GHZ
 
Isn't it ironic how Gates' decides to use the same processor already implemented into the PowerMac G5?
 
Jmitch said:
Isn't it ironic how Gates' decides to use the same processor already implemented into the PowerMac G5?
It's even more ironic they used PowerMacs to design and test their system.
 
I'll be preordering 2 of these... one for the living room, one for the bedroom. The built-in integration with Windows Media Center (stream music and movies from WMC PC) is wicked cool.
 
Lacero said:
Price hasn't been set yet, but I believe the prices will be $399 or $449 at least. This is a product for those who already own an old game console and are looking to upgrade. $299 is just way too low for this sort of graphics powerhouse. Microsoft owns the PPC chip design so costs would be lower, but not by much.

Nobody is going to pay $400 for a game console. Typically the console makers take a hit on the machine and make money off of the games during the five year life span.
 
Blackheart said:
My guess is that these are pre-specifications.

Console Specs



Hmmm... probably NOT. Seeing that Virginia Tech (2200 G5's) does about 10 teraflops...

Take notice of the footnote though:


Well done!!

I thought the claim of 1 Teraflop was a bit sus... Fair enough they are using IBM chips and a dedicated system architecture, but this claim has to be fake. If this 1 Teraflop is true :rolleyes: there will be a whole lot of people wanting these things for reasons other than gaming ;). And considering the price of the 'box' .. peh....

I own an xbox and I would be willing to buy a '360 if there is confirmed backwards software compatibility. Has anyone been able to find some concrete evidence the '360 will have this feature. I have googled for 20 mins and have only found rumors and speculation.... :confused:


aussie_geek
 
Linux 360

nsjoker said:
after reading several forums i noticed the topic of using the 360 as a general purpose pc comes up a lot. sorry guys but it's not happening. microsoft will subsidize the machine losing money on each $299 xbox 360 unit they sell, but they hope to gain it back in the future through the games and xbox live service.

if people used it as a pc, microsoft would never get their money back, so you can rest assured microsoft has made it a point to make this thing damn near impossible to mod or crack.

a 9.6 ghz pc w/ 512 ram and that ati card for only $299 is too good to be true. :rolleyes:

Someone will have Linux running on it in within a month. You'll see. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see an OS X hack. Oh, the irony.
 
aussie_geek said:
Well done!!

I thought the claim of 1 Teraflop was a bit sus... Fair enough they are using IBM chips and a dedicated system architecture, but this claim has to be fake. If this 1 Teraflop is true :rolleyes: there will be a whole lot of people wanting these things for reasons other than gaming ;). And considering the price of the 'box' .. peh....

I own an xbox and I would be willing to buy a '360 if there is confirmed backwards software compatibility. Has anyone been able to find some concrete evidence the '360 will have this feature. I have googled for 20 mins and have only found rumors and speculation.... :confused:


aussie_geek

My bet is that microsoft is still struggling with making the BC possible. If there is no mention of it at E3 then you can expect the X360 not to have it. It's not a big deal. Nintendo has release every single consolde before the revolution not BC ans still moved hardware. My ol' xbox won't stop working when I purchased the X360.
 
aussie_geek said:
If this 1 Teraflop is true :rolleyes: there will be a whole lot of people wanting these things for reasons other than gaming ;).
I can see GLpraxis rolling his eyes now.
rolleyes.gif
 
Object-X said:
Someone will have Linux running on it in within a month. You'll see. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised to see an OS X hack. Oh, the irony.

I would love to see that. I would run OSX on it.
 
Jmitch said:
Isn't it ironic how Gates' decides to use the same processor already implemented into the PowerMac G5?
not really seeing as they had windows NT for powerpc before, I don't think its that far fetched to see MS use powerpc again.
 
lordmac said:
Ya i just saw the mtv thing and wow talk


Wow. The biggest news here is people still watch Marketing TV. :D

PS- To all the people bitching about the specs...you are talking out your ***. The specs are more then fine for a console. I personally am going to wait until next year and see what Sony and Nintendo come out with.
 
SiliconAddict said:
I personally am going to wait until next year and see what Sony and Nintendo come out with.
And miss out on an entire year of kick-ass game play? You, mon ami, is not a hard-core gamer. :eek:
 
shadowguy said:
Nintendos Revolution is rumored to run on a custom 4 core G5 running at 2.5Ghz each.

Xbox 360 is supposed to run with the R500 video card, while the Revolution is supposed to be running an R520. The Revolution will be a lot better, power wise, than the Xbox 360.

I would sure hope so, considering that Revolution gets released significantly after 360 is released! It would be the same thing if someone said "Hi-end PC of 2007 will be alot faster than current top of the line PowerMacs are!"
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.